This page serves as a working hub for collating reviews of all works authored by Bright, as detailed in Stage 2 of the proposal. See also: Bright Works Review - Tales/Other
Backlinks
Total Backlinks: 96/96
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:scp-7996-1
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:scp-5500-3
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:scp-5128-1
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:pr1-15
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:pr1-2-0
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:scp-6170-1
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/art:dr-avenlee-s-artchives
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/zhange-artwork
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/zal-cryptid-s-artwork-hub
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/what-you-are-in-the-dark
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/unfinished-business-ii
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/unfinished-business
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/twas-the-night-before-christmas
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-peculiar-case-of-custodian-woodworth-and-dr-bright
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-many-portraits-of-jack-bright
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-last-good-man-in-the-foundation
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-high-court-with-the-magic-army
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/nil-engines
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/starch-and-cream
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/stand-off
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/showtime
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/galerie-d-illustrations-de-seyph
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-cn-2626
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-7515
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-7162
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-705
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-7001
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6996
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6900
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6871
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6800
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6776
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6747
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6395-j
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-5369
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-5004
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-4498
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-4444
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-4056
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3831
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3751
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3498
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3461
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3301-testing-log
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3192
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2935
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2817
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2799
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2315
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-209-j
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-1980
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-044-j
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-the-anime-part-4-gears-iceberg-clef-kondraki-rights-ligh
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-buns
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/resistile-decomm-attempt
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/reality-s-very-real-probably-cognitohazardous-art-page
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/public-static-void
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/prisoners
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/post-finem
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/persephone-project
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/othello-makes-some-drawings
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/note-immortality-amulet
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/nine-tales-from-the-cativerse
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/new-technical-issues-archive
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/new-kid-on-the-block
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/mzl-1730
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/moose-s-workbench
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/your-circuits-dead-theres-something-wrong
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/main-office-ii
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/lord-stonefish
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/this-is-the-real-life
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/incursion
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/incident-239-b-clef-kondraki
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/holy-mackerel
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/habil-and-qabil
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/final-thoughts-again
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/expiration-date
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/experiment-log-t-98816-oc108-682
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/experiment-log-702
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/eric-h-s-author-page
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/dr-gibbons-personnel-file
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/containment-breach-the-musical
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/confirmed-sightings
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/cephalopodstevenson-artwork
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/caimanchameleon
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/bright-in-the-fantadation
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/breakerbreaker-s-art-page
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/audio-log-185-53
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/art-contest-hub-series-1
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/and-then-i-died
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/maybe-i-m-a-king
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/aethris-art
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/a-story-from-a-future
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/a-site-19-christmas-carol
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/a-keter-kinda-christmas
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-best-and-the-wisest
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:scp-7996-1
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Just used as a hyperlink in Bright's email signature.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Only tangentially Bright-related.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-5500 and fragments
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Dr. Bright is the antagonist of SCP-5500; this article may be rewritten by the author's curators to remove him.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- This article is largely a Twine game with a lot of stuff to edit.
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- The author was uncomfortable with the article's use of Bright after AdminBright's actions came to light, and intended to replace the character.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:scp-5128-1
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- 963 used as an example of an intended ritual in a single sentence with hyperlink.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- Passing reference and easily replaced with something else, or left without the hyperlink.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Not directly related to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:pr1-15
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- A single piece of art on what is probably the most stuffed-to-the-brim art page on the site.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Just a user's art gallery, though the "he sure is wacky" under the image of Bright and 963 isn't great.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:pr1-2-0
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- A single piece of art on what is probably the most stuffed-to-the-brim art page on the site.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Just a user's art gallery. It does quote a line from 963 about 963-2.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/fragment:scp-6170-1
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Dr. Bright is depicted as suffering from severe personality overlap due to 963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- An interview with Dr. Bright suffering from 963's effects is central to the piece.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- The use of Dr. Bright does involve the possession aspect, but its own contributions are not problematic.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- 963 itself is not fully explained by the article, relying on the backlink and public knowledge.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/art:dr-avenlee-s-artchives
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- A single image in an art gallery of SCP-963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Just a user's art gallery.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- The drawing of an amulet isn't particularly reliant on the hyperlink.
Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/zhange-artwork
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Just a user's art gallery.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/zal-cryptid-s-artwork-hub
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- A single image in a user's art gallery, of the amulet.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Just a user's art gallery.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/what-you-are-in-the-dark
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Re-imagining of what SCP-963 is, and what Bright is.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- Bright and 963 are the article's core subject.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- It does depict a version of Bright capable of having multiple selves, but there is little to no connection to the more problematic aspects of the character, as this is a reimagining.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- There's no backlink at all, the article just references 963 by name; nothing can be removed.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/unfinished-business-ii
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is about how use of 963 is aggregating personality elements onto Bright, making him less and less stable.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- "And for the last time, Dr. Glass looked at Jack, currently in the body of a green-eyed, red-haired child rapist" has not aged well, the intentions of the piece notwithstanding. This tale and its prequel would benefit from a contextual disclaimer in my opinion.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/unfinished-business
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Article involves Bright using 963 to use the body of a female researcher.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- Though apparently written with the intent to demonize Bright's popular characterization, it is difficult without that context to extricate this from the other works (a problem AdminBright themself exacerbated). Some lines are particularly unpleasant when connected to the Bright ouvre: "Clef… walked over and forced her body over, straddling her small, heaving chest." This tale and its sequel would benefit from a contextual disclaimer in my opinion.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/twas-the-night-before-christmas
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- 963 is hyperlinked but the poem really just uses Bright as a generic protagonist.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- It's just a poem, even if it doesn't scan.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-peculiar-case-of-custodian-woodworth-and-dr-bright
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Article is about how a hundred or so years of using 963 reduces Bright to a near-vegetative state.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Article is about Bright's possession of multiple people over the years but it is solely a sad, unpleasant description.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- But you can't anyway, there's no hyperlink. Anyway the article does not explain 963 sufficiently, relying on reader knowledge.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-many-portraits-of-jack-bright
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is about Bright speaking to the waning minds of the people he is replacing, and does not itself explain 963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- It's the topic of the article.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Although the content can be read as a sympathetic portrayal of Bright while he is behaving pretty horribly to the people he's replacing; this is likely not the intended reading.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-last-good-man-in-the-foundation
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Dr. Shaw is mentioned once, and is not the titular Last Good Man. The hyperlink to 963 does explain the following line of dialogue, but said line works just fine cryptic too.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-high-court-with-the-magic-army
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- Mention of 963-2 and mention of Tamlin Bright, as part of ongoing Resurrection story.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- Both elements are not-insubstantial elements of the plot.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Article doesn't go into much Bright-related stuff, and likely what is there will be revised by thedeadlymoose at some point as part of a canon revamp.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Some rewriting would be required.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/nil-engines
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Dr. Shaw plays a significant part in this farcical story.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- While not the main focus, Shaw is mentioned throughout and appears in person as the topic of one scene.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Could use a refresh by the author I think; "After all, Dr. Shaw has decreed that girls belong in the home, serving and pleasuring their husbands." and "I can't help it if Shaw is awful and vulgar" have not aged well, even with the replacement.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- The references to the character are relatively important to the story; the backlink itself is largely superfluous.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/starch-and-cream
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Shaw is mentioned in two sentences amidst a description of the fates of other characters. The hyperlink is largely superfluous except to signal that Shaw is Bright.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Barely related to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/stand-off
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Bright's SCP-963 backstory is the climax of the article, and knowledge of what happens there is necessary for it to land.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Bright family article focusing on getting women pregnant and leaving them, and the family dynamics of these almost exclusively very problematic characters.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
N/A
- Because you can't, there is no backlink. It's a textual reference. The textual reference is the article's punchline, so removing it would have major effects.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: # https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/showtime
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- A creature that has been affected by 963 is a central element.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Article does not otherwise explain 963.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/galerie-d-illustrations-de-seyph
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Single illustration of Bright and amulet among many other illustrations.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-7515
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Single table entry mentioning Bright and 963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-7162
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Article kills Bright offscreen, blackboxes his name, hyperlink is the only evidence that it's him.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- Tiny little plot point in a long article.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-705
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- Dr. Bright shows up in a wikiwalk-style addendum at the end of this short article.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- It's just one section at the end, and doesn't make a very good ending.
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- Because that section was added by… AdminBright!
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- It's just a lousy addendum ending in true Series I style. The article was originally posted without it.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-7001
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Dr. Shaw is one of several senior staff attached to an anomalously over-the-top Site-19 manifestation; he is not featured prominently, though he is mentioned several times.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- The character is intentionally downplayed; though the basic elements are present, and noted, Shaw is barely there.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Nothing related to any of the problematic aspects of Bright minus the personality-overwriting necklace, and it's all downplayed.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- There's no hyperlink, and the character contributes very little to the story.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6996
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Single reference to 963 and its central gem in a table of red objects.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright; does mention that 963 has hosts.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6900
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Mentions that character stole 963 in a previous article.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- See above; also there is no hyperlink to 963.
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6871
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- An anomaly is tested on Dr. Shaw in several sections of a table that makes up most of the article; he is erased from existence, though eventually restored, although basically all of the Foundation is erased by the end.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- Several of the key tests involve Dr. Shaw.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Other than mention of Dr. Shaw's amulet and its consciousness-imprinting-on-hosts capability, unrelated to the character.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- See above; there is a hyperlink to SCP-963, and the amulet is a fairly important part of the testing procedure.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6800
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Bright is the protagonist; though their name has subsequently been scrubbed and replaced, the hyperlink to 963 still makes this clear.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- It's an article by Bright written by another AHT-banned user (
Marceline_Raynes).
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- This article is Bright from start to finish.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6776
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Dr. Shaw is a major character in the article, and his survival is linked to SCP-963, the properties of which are discussed.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Not beyond the inclusion of Shaw and the nature of 963 and its hosts.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6747
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Dr. Bright and other lolFoundation characters coming to life as the result of an anomalous machine is the topic of this article.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- Bright, being deconstructed as a ridiculous character, is central.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- The article does not contribute to the overall issues with Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6395-j
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- One joke among many about SCP characters being turned into marine animals, with an entirely purposeless hyperlink to 963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- The link itself is pointless and the character could be excised entirely without effect.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6500
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- 963 is mentioned as having been neutralized off-screen.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- Throwaway line with zero details.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Just an obscure mention, in the context of suggesting Bright is now dead, taking up a tiny percentage of this 95k word article.
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-5369
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Article is about Dr. Bright musing on immortality with another immortal character.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- Bright is one of two primary characters.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- The exploration of the character is sympathetic but entirely omits the negative aspects; if there is anything problematic it is that Bright is too squeaky clean compared to his usual portrayals, as this take is much more philosophical (and doesn't have an opinion on the whole body snatching thing).
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Bright and 963 are central to the piece.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-5004
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Shaw, following up from the last political kcon article by kaktus, is a relatively central figure. His ability to take over bodies is a plot point.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- Bright is present throughout the piece.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Dr. Shaw takes over (read: kills) a 19-year-old woman and is placed in a situation where Donald Trump makes sexual overtures at her.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: # https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-4498
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is about everybody at a Site, which is apparently most notable characters at the time this was written, being turned into Elias Shaw and acting out lolFoundation shenanigans.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- In addition to the possession stuff, which is the primary point of the piece, there is this: "Instead I have to listen to Elias Shaw fuck Elias Shaw for twelve hours. You know how much Shaw on Shaw fucking there was going on in there, Kaden?" These were other people before that happened.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-4444
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is about Elias Shaw taking over George Bush's corpse to run against Al Gore, who is an alien.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- Shaw says this: "-there’s two things that ain’t gonna be in my White House. The first is communists. We broke the red menace ten years ago, and we ain’t gonna be inviting her back. The second, is secretary-fuckers. In a Bush White House, you can know for damn sure we’re only fucking one things - our wives, aggressively. And the retards, of course, but you know what they say, you can take the boy out of Texas, but you can’t take the Texas out of the boy. Heh heh."
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-4056
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Article is about a lot of different versions of Dr. Gears; one has a ring that is implied to work like SCP-963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- Just one among many, a throwaway table entry.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3831
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- 963 is hyperlinked to explain how the Foundation handles a massive influx of anomalous new employees: "Why do you think the Foundation has a bejeweled immortal body-hopper running our human resources department? That's the only way we can keep track of who we find and who we're sent."
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- It's only a brief mention, but it does come right at the end in the closing note so it has an important narrative place.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- After the mention of Bright handling the new employees, we get "They integrate so quickly. In more ways than one." The vagueness may imply Bright uses 963 to put his pattern on the new hires.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3751
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Article is about a series of chess moves that cause body-swapping. Reference to 963 is in the style of a Wikiwalk addition which adds nothing.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Unrelated to Bright, and also slowly trending down; article is at +13.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3498
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- 962-2 and O5-9's role in creating it is used to explain their immortality-seeking backstory. It's just a paragraph.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise does not involve Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- It's just a passing reference to prove a point.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3461
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Article is about a Foundation-created afterlife; 963-2 is incorporated into it, mentioned only in a single table with multiple other items.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3301-testing-log
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- Features a monkey pirate version of Bright which is the subject of one log.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- It's not the entire page but it is a relatively large log.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- One log's character is reliant on Bright/963.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3192
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Dr. Bright is floated and rejected as a possible test subject due to the nature of his immortality.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Very minor inclusion, although the brief lines would now only make sense to anyone who already knows about Bright/963.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2935
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Bright's remains are found in an anomalous graveyard, along with an inert copy of 963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- Just a single table item.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Article is otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Just one item, though context would be lost if 963 was no longer on the wiki.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2817
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- A posthumous character referred to throughout is the D-class who became the first new host of Dr. Bright.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- It doesn't really seem like this plot point is all that key. (However, see the next section.) It isn't mentioned again after the hyperlink points it out.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Appears unrelated to Bright, BUT. Article is about an eldritch entity which appears to two young boys and performs 'rituals' with them; sexual assault is a possible interpretation, and the two boys exhibit features of abused partners in denial as they age, leading to violent behaviour prompted by the entity, leading to their incarceration and becoming D-Class. One of these becomes Dr. Bright's host eventually; possible to read this as implying that some element of Bright's abuse is rooted in the childhood abuse of a future host of his.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Without the hyperlink, the interpretations above no longer become current.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2799
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Article involves a character speaking in riddles about the Bright family, and also being involved in the origin story of Dr. Bright re: SCP-963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- It's a big part of the plot, and the question of Dr. Bright's rights as a researcher is given its own log.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Doesn't address any of the problematic aspects of Bright, though it very much references the wider body of works.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2315
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- In an article where an anomaly rattles off a lot of Foundation details which are crosslinked, Bright and his amulet are included.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- It's a single line among many other references.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-209-j
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Among many attempts to terminate a housefly is Dr. Bright putting 963 on it.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- One brief gag among many.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-1980
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- A wikiwalk-style addition says that the discs in this article which contain alien consciousness were used in attempts to create SCP-963-2.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- One very brief reference would no longer make sense.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-044-j
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- Anomaly compels people to speak fancily; Dr. Bright says "Chairman of the O5 Council, I humbly request your due permission to utilise chainsaw propulsion devices in my scandalous endeavours." That's it.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- Just one example among (too) many.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Although that single quotation does reference Bright's "scandalous endeavours" which reads a little differently now.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Just one reference. Page would be improved without it.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-the-anime-part-4-gears-iceberg-clef-kondraki-rights-ligh
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Bright's presence is restricted to a few throwaway gag lines.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Not directly as regards Bright, but multiple female author avatars are sexualized, as are several female SCP objects, and immature sexual references are pretty much constant from start to finish; article "rates" itself at "R15+"
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- See above. Just a few references.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-buns
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- Art page with a lot of images; illustration of SCP-963 and later Bright with 963 included, in cute bunny form, are two among many.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/resistile-decomm-attempt
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Just one reference in this long Pokemon-themed April Fools Day Post: "Since Series 1, Resistile has been kept vaguely in check by the equally annoying Shawright. This would continue to hold true to this day… had the No No List not been removed. Without the List as an option, this is what the Resistile-Shawright matchup looks like" Which is one more than there should have been?
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- But like… why is there a Bright reference in here?
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Seriously why is there a Bright reference?
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/reality-s-very-real-probably-cognitohazardous-art-page
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- There's two pieces of Bright fanart in this gallery, one of 963 and one of Tamlin.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- There's plenty of other pieces in the gallery.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Although it's not really *necessary* that it have these elements either, as with other art pages.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/public-static-void
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is about Bright on a spaceship being humanity's sole survivor forever.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- The possession aspect is there, but in this case it is used to permanently put Bright in a living/dying/living hell. It is, however, still a use of Bright and the effect of 963.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/prisoners
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Bright, and the whole 963 deal, are the core of the ending section of this tale.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- "John Peters" shares a last name with AdminBright, so that's weird. Bright's entrance into the tale also reads like a predator cornering a woman in her office.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/post-finem
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- One section among many detailing Foundation researcher fates; Dr. Bright takes over an alien who finds his medallion in one.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- It's the subject of an entire section.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/persephone-project
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Dr. Shaw is involved in a project to end human life; this project incidentally involves infecting a three-year-old girl and erasing her brain with 963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- This is what the article is leading up to.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Given the connection to Bright/Shaw the above is unfortunate.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: othello-makes-some-drawings
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Single image in an art gallery of Dr. Bright's clothed upper chest with SCP-963 on it.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- Just one image in a gallery.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/note-immortality-amulet
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is nothing beyond a description of 963 and how Nobody compares it to themself.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Inasmuch as it is very little beyond a restatement of 963, which is problematic.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/nine-tales-from-the-cativerse
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Tale of vignettes of Foundation characters as cats. Bright is the subject of one scene, now a cat forced to be in a man's body.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Just cats. "It's hard to lick yourself clean when you're stuck as a biped." is pretty gross coming from Dr. Bright, though.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/new-technical-issues-archive
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Large collab log with several entries that mention Bright.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- Very large collab log. Not very many mentions.
Is this work problematic itself?
I dunno
- It's a seventeen thousand word collab log. The Bright mentions hint at him being a wildcard and untrustworthy but that's about it.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- It's a seventeen thousand word collab log.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/new-kid-on-the-block
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Dr. Bright is included in various senior staff shenanigans, including taking over a body made of pumpkins.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- It's a pretty major vignette in the story.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- It's about a teenage reality bender being a huge Gary Stu and hanging out with all the adult researchers.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/mzl-1730
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Dr. Shaw is a recurrent character, though not loadbearing.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
I dunno
- It's a Man-Zoo League article, I don't think figuring that out is worth taking time away from finishing the rest of these reviews; notably Dr. Shaw says "I spent the last six weeks shoving Troy Lament's dick into progressively smaller bottles" which seems a bit much.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/your-circuits-dead-theres-something-wrong
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is an author's take on the Bright siblings and their dynamic pre-Foundation as teenagers/young adults.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant / Major / Minor / Insignificant
- Jack Bright is the POV character, and SCP-963 a major plot element.
Is this work problematic itself?
Unsure
- Article contains Jack, Mikell, TJ and Claire Bright who are in and of themselves coming with inherent baggage when not viewed in a vacuum.
- Handles subject matter of familial abuse [verbal, primarily] and neglect but portrayal is decent
- No weird pedo shit, at the least. Article does not acknowledge/address that part of the character
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Central to the article's plot
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/main-office-ii
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Dr. Bright in a cuckoo's body is a Wandsmen mentor.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- The character has several passages devoted to him.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Minus the fact that Bright mentoring people is ick.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/lord-stonefish
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- A (broken) hyperlink on LSF's authorpage mentioning that SCP-2817 is about a minor character from 963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- Just an author page reference.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/this-is-the-real-life
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Mention of Dr. Bright amongst a slew of other references, not particularly sensitive.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- It's so tremendously Mary Sue on purpose that there's not much room for it to be problematic.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- But not a lot;
thedeadlymoose could probably resolve the reference very easily.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/incursion
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- One section of this long tale is about Dr. Bright and his clone bodies shuffling around.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- It's the topic of one section, but there are a lot of sections.
Is this work problematic itself?
I dunno
- Too long to check right now outside of the context of this project.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/incident-239-b-clef-kondraki
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Bright (character) is involved in one section of this collaborative tale. AdminBright wrote that section.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- It's an entire section of the article, and it was written by AdminBright.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- It is about a bunch of adults trying to murder a kid, after all. Dr. Bright steals a woman's body, and it is casually murdered; Clef causes a tree in the form of a woman to "flower" and "fruit"; Clef kills the mother of his kid; Dr. Bright ends up in an orangutan; etc.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/holy-mackerel
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Recurring mention of "Brightbots" created by implanting shards of 963 into androids.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- It's a plot element and it's mentioned several times but it's not the main point.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- The Brightbots are described as first beating staff members, then at a later time drugging them into being good workers.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/habil-and-qabil
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- Description of an anomalous teen sitcom starring Foundation characters; Dr. Bright is mentioned very briefly in one scene.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- A lot of the usual weirdness when older articles talk about teenagers: "[Iris] tells [Able] to either come fuck her or kill her when he figures it out"; "The secondary plot involves Iris attempting to explain 'the birds and the bees' to Cybie [also a teenager] and Stella, which quickly becomes inappropriate, as well as involving far too much of her relationship with Able."; "The referee is a man wearing SCP-963, SCP-166 serves as a ring girl" (Bright with a teenager, particularly one whose original article was extremely inappropriate); "While looking after the girls, Able becomes frustrated with Stella's limitations and physically hits her."
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Reference is extremely brief, almost desultory.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/final-thoughts-again
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is about a person being slowly taken over by Dr. Bright via 963, told from their perspective.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- Article is about a person being slowly taken over by Dr. Bright via 963, told from their perspective.
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- Article is about a person being slowly taken over by Dr. Bright via 963, told from their perspective.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Article is about a person being slowly taken over by Dr. Bright via 963, told from their perspective.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/expiration-date
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Article is about the funeral of Bright and talks a lot about him and 963.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- Article was written as Bright's actions were still in a lots-of-people-know-but-not-everybody situation, and therefore the tone is about how Character!Bright was horrible and victimized people but the people who worked with him saw him as a kindred spirit and appreciated the work he did etc. which seems inappropriately even-handed given the present state of information.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/experiment-log-t-98816-oc108-682
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- Hyperlinks to other articles (by Bright) linking them to the 682 decoms.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- Contains hyperlinks to "We're Off To Be The Lizard" by AdminBright and "Tales From the Bright Side 1," also part of this review; possibly more.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Hyperlinks add absolutely nothing to this page except redirecting users to works by AdminBright.
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/experiment-log-702
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Single entry in a collab log.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Entry involves Dr. Bright receiving a good bowl of cereal. That's it.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/eric-h-s-author-page
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Author page where the author notes that SCP-1980 (covered above) references SCP-963-2, and that an article was written for "Bright's Challenge" i.e. writing in the edit box and posting within a day with no crit.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Unrelated
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/dr-gibbons-personnel-file
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- Author page ends with jokes about how Dr. Gibbons is not Dr. Bright, playing on Bright's monkey possession thing; contains a paraphrase of language from SCP-963's conprocs.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- Section is brief, but it is also the end of the page.
Is this work problematic itself?
Probably Not
- But I'm not sure if this is about the author IRL or not: "Has shown symptoms of high-functioning Tourette's Syndrome - diagnosis pending." If not, it's a weird thing to put on there.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Does alter the author page's punchline, if that matters.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/containment-breach-the-musical
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Bright is the protagonist and 963 is key to the plot.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- Bright has a romance with a female Kondraki; Bright manages SCP-105, Iris, who is in most canon a teenager; Iris has a romance with Able, who is ancient.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/confirmed-sightings
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- SCP-963's main page image is one of the few images still on this Licensing nightmare page.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- It's just images from other articles with triangles drawn on them.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Because there isn't very much left on the page to begin with.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/cephalopodstevenson-artwork
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- LEGO image of SCP-963 presumably about to be used on a bound and headbagged D-Class against their will.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- One entry on an art page with many.
Is this work problematic itself?
Maybe
- The Vorehole is also on here.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Plenty of other images on here already.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/caimanchameleon
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Single art piece of 963 in a gallery.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Otherwise unrelated to Bright.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/bright-in-the-fantadation
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Bright is the protagonist, 963 is a key plot element.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Not beyond the concepts of Bright and 963.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/where-the-followers-remain
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Bright is a protagonist, following up on "Bright in the Fantadation."
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Not beyond the concepts of Bright and 963.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/breakerbreaker-s-art-page
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Passing Reference
- One rendition of 963 and a variety of Bright hosts.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
- One of many artworks in the gallery, though more complex than most drawings of Bright.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
- Lots of other art on here.
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/audio-log-185-53
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Bright is an important character in this sports spoof.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
- Bright appears throughout.
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes!
- In addition to being full of sexual references, this article specifically includes Dr. Bright having "graciously volunteered" to judge a bikini contest that includes Iris, typically portrayed as a teenager; another entrant has "been given several shots of testosterone" and Bright disqualifies them; Bright "graciously" allows a slave collar to stay on a woman; back to Iris: "here comes 105, dressed in a nice one-piece," "You have to appreciate the modesty of the girl… though it seems Bright doesn't"; several more SCPs objectified; Bright makes a penis reference; Bright makes the contest a four-way tie so that "the winner will be chosen by sexual fav-"; 'Bright is trying to call the game off for claiming it an affront to beach volleyball… citing lack of desirable women."; etc. etc. etc. etc.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- Who else would fulfill the role of the sexual predator played for laughs?
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: # https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/art-contest-hub-series-1
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Single image of D-Class with 963 in massive gallery.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Minor
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Just a gallery of contest entrants.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: # https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/and-then-i-died
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Bright and 963 are central elements in one of the vignettes in this collection.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- The Bright vignette is a detailed description of Bright in a woman's body seducing the POV character and then killing them via possession with 963.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
- It would affect the relevant section.
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/maybe-i-m-a-king
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- An antagonist being Jack Bright in Aces and Eights, identified by his red jewel-tipped cane, is the primary subject of the piece.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- No more than anything else using this character and item and their attributes.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/aethris-art
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Barely
- Single artwork depicting only the amulet.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Insignificant
- Just one artwork among many.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
No
Verdict: Minorly Related
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/a-story-from-a-future
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Bright is an O5 in this tale.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- Bright's character gets a lot of the dialogue.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Bright is the most obviously morally-upright member of the Council; an awkward and unfortunate depiction, considering, but does not make the article itself objectionable.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/a-site-19-christmas-carol
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Bright/963 is the central character, playing Scrooge in a thin Foundation gloss on A Christmas Carol.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Major
- See above; little is made of the character's actual attributes minus a few brief mentions of 963 and the fact that he is a monkey, however.
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- It's just A Christmas Carol. There are a few lines that feel weird pertaining to Shaw. One he says: "I support rounding up the unfortunate for testing, and erasing the memories of those whose lives we devastate in pursuit of our goal." One said about him: "Shaw! You old cocksucker." Mostly though it's just Scrooge if he swore.
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/a-keter-kinda-christmas
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Notable
- Bright is the central character, though 963 hasn't got much to do with it.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
Yes
- Brief musing on whether 18 is too young for a bird to hear a camel toe joke and I am so fucking tired you guys;
- "Dr. Bright: Rights, I didn't put up any mistletoe this year. The Ethics Committee is still reviewing the sexual harassment complaints from last year!"
- Then she throws off her clothes to reveal Christmas lingerie, and sings a song that includes "Santa baby, hurry up my chimney tonight"
- Later she tells Able "Dr. Rights: I don't think you'll have to worry about wringing your own beast's neck tonight." This produces "Extreme close-up on Able with a comic "SPROING!" sound effect."
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant
Backlinked Article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/the-best-and-the-wisest
How Reliant is the Work on This Article?
Critical
- Bright being immortal and Clef deciding to kill him is the core conceit.
How Significant is the Inclusion, Re: Scale/Scope?
Significant
Is this work problematic itself?
No
- Although this dialogue has aged interestingly: "I am afraid," Clef said, "of what it will imply when the most powerful and influential member of the Foundation is an SCP himself. I worry that… not now… not a hundred years from now… but someday, you will have lived so long and become so strange that you are no longer human. And by then, you may be too powerful to stop. So that threat must be nipped in the bud now."
If the backlink was removed, would it meaningfully impact this page?
Yes
Verdict: Directly Reliant