Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »

Queerious and Esperion also agree AI was used to generate the page/image.

Sections of note:

Background and Discovery: SCP-7517’s anomalous properties were first discovered in ██/██/20██, following a series of unsolved murder cases attributed to various uncontainable entities across multiple SCP sites. The Foundation observed that SCP-7517 systematically solved cases deemed unsolvable by conventional or anomalous methods, often without being granted access to critical evidence. His involvement suggested a supernatural proficiency. The SCP Foundation contained SCP-7517 after a covert operation during which it had independently breached the containment of SCP-████ to “interrogate” it as part of an ongoing case.

O5 Memorandum: While SCP-7517 offers potential insight into high-priority cases, personnel are reminded that interactions with the entity are a calculated risk. SCP-7517’s statements and actions must be taken with caution, as it may use Foundation resources for undisclosed motives aligning with its anomalous obsession with justice.

User has no forum posts, and their mainsite edits are "failing to upload the image, changing a few wordings here or there, and then their attempt to fix the URL etc." They have a sandbox page which has no revisions beyond page creation, and was created after the mainsite pages were coldposted.

Membership revoked, PM sent.

Re: AI Record - Ken Mercury by ZynZyn, 11 Nov 2024 08:06

Declined Purple_CEOPurple_CEO for name, and application that did not meet criteria:

I'm a member of the Italian Branch of the SCP Foundation, I translate SCPs articles from english to italian language.

Re: Username Log by ZynZyn, 11 Nov 2024 07:53

Received the following three replies:

10 Nov 2024, 10:00

I don’t mean to argue but I don’t literally mean he has another account he just helped me write it you see I have mild autism so he was just helping me

10 Nov 2024, 10:04

Maybe he used AI and didn’t tell me if that’s the case then I’m really sorry and I won’t get his help with any more articles

10 Nov 2024, 10:05

I meant adhd sorry lol

Sent back:

Again, the SCP wiki does not allow account sharing. Given that the help you received entirely changed the page and the new text was very different from your own writing, that would count as co-authoring. Co-authors need to have separate accounts on the SCP wiki; they cannot contribute shared writing using a single account.
Staff see this kind of "it's not my fault I broke the rules, it was someone else not me" excuse fairly often. Please note that lying about AI usage is grounds for a permanent ban from the site.
Re: AI Record - Dr Houdini by ZynZyn, 11 Nov 2024 07:48

It was brought to staff attention that Ken MercuryKen Mercury (account age 2 days, site membership 21 hours) posted the articles: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-7517-the-gentlemen-s-clutches and https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/user:ken-mercury, both of which are identical and contained multiple indicators of AI-generation.

Notes: No substantial Revision History. Sandbox draft here: https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/ken-mercury. Image included appears to be AI.

Disc Team, please weigh in.

AI Record - Ken Mercury by ZoobeenyZoobeeny, 11 Nov 2024 05:22

Received the following reply:

I didn’t use AI Ik this is a standard response but I have been a fan of the SCP foundation for years now? I didn’t use any AI mate my friends Joseph is an English major and we both wrote this article?

Sent back:

Your article contains atypical formatting that only AI-generators output. An English major familiar with the SCP wiki's standard template would have no reason to add the extraneous subheadings your page revision contains.
The SCP wiki does not allow account sharing. This is noted in the site rules. If you were to co-author a page with another person, that person needs to have their own wikidot account separate from yours so they can be properly credited.
Re: AI Record - Dr Houdini by ZynZyn, 10 Nov 2024 07:55

Received the following reply to the revocation message:

Hi there, I’m disappointed to see this, as I did not use AI. What can i do to prove this? What AI detector are you using?

Sent back:

Provide an in-progress rough draft, with proof of progression edits, to indicate how the page was created from scratch. Your sandbox has an entire article fully formed at the initial revision, with atypical formatting identical to AI-generated output.
One of your forum posts contained an AI prompt generator remnant. Specifically, "Here's a more polished version of your response:".
Re: AI Record - Death by Dusk by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 22:25

Agreed with AI-generation, particularly given addition of extraneous subheadings:

Additionally, compare:

Description: SCP-8126 is a tall, and gray humanoid figure devoid of facial features, SCP-8126's exact height is 7 foot five inches (7'5) and SCP-8126 is exactly one-hundred thirty-three pounds and seven ounces (133.7 lb) SCP-8126 is an almost fully transparent entity and is slightly disfigured, meaning that SCP-8126's arms are abnormally long. SCP-8126's facial features are stitched up with scarlett thread. Every 4 hours SCP-8126 makes a pained moan as if the entity is trying to scream in pain but cant since his mouth is sewed shut.

SCP-8126 is a tall, semi-translucent humanoid entity measuring approximately 2.26 meters (7’5”) in height, with a recorded weight of 133.7 lbs (60.7 kg). Its skin is pale and mottled, with a distinctly scarred and stretched appearance. The most defining characteristic of SCP-8126 is its face, which appears to be devoid of standard human features. Instead, where the eyes, nose, and mouth would normally appear, SCP-8126 displays tightly sewn stitches of vivid scarlet thread, preventing any facial expressions or vocal articulation.

Furthermore, the user lied about usage of AI: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-8126/comments/show#post-6728016 post title "I STUDIED AND CHANGED IT"

I got help from my friend who is a English major and I think it’s way better now

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16858583/scp-announcements-56:monarchflys-in-air-set-still#post-6728035

Hello! So I have revised my SCP I know I got some backlash for my recent SCP but I’ve updated and made it way longer. Please go ahead and rate it and vote it

Membership revoked, PM sent. Esperion and Kufat supporting.

Re: AI Record - Dr Houdini by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 22:10

It was brought to staff attention that Hazel CoopingerHazel Coopinger (account age 6 days, site membership 5 days) recently coldposted the following page: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-8289 which is now deleted. It contained hallmarks of AI-generation, including:

Conclusion: SCP-8289 poses a significant risk to the psychological well-being of personnel. Continuous research into its origins and the implications of its anomalous abilities is ongoing. Further containment measures may be required should the risks associated with SCP-8289 escalate.

Of note, due to the username there may be a relation to this case: https://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-16943359/ai-record-doctor-hazel-cooper

User has no forum history, no sandbox history, and their only mainsite edits are editing the series listing to add/remove article titles.

Membership revoked, PM sent.

AI Record - Hazel Coopinger by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 21:57

Received the following reply to the revoke message:

It wasnt AI

User appears to have self-deleted the page before the revoke.

ETA: due to the user lying repeatedly about AI usage, a yearlong ban has been implemented. Kufat and Queerious agreeing with ban.

Ban implemented, PM sent.

ETA 2: received this reply

i'm not lying

Sent a reply reiterating instructions on how to submit a ban appeal. They replied:

what channel in the discord server is for ban appeals

To which I sent back: "Please ask a server moderator for assistance."

And their response was:

no

I will not be replying any further.

Re: AI Record - JoeyBoey by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 21:46

Additional note: they have also used AI to generate feedback posts. Note the difference capitalization (consistent with their intro thread post) and the common AI hallmarks for the later portions of comments.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16978696/scp-8365:the-mesozoic-return-seeking-critiques-and-greenligh#post-6719200

I Can not Provide a Greenlight and am still pretty new to reviewing SCP ideas and drafts, so take everything I say with a big grain of salt.

SCPs these days tend to have more narrative depth; why does the skeleton behave this way? Is it following instincts? Trying to rebuild itself? As of now, I am having a hard time seeing its motivation.

There’s potential for tension if it seems like the skeleton is always adapting or planning. Adding some mechanics around its abilities (like, can it control human skeletons, too?) could help make it stand out.

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16978709/seeking-greenlights-late-nights-with-miss-nova#post-6719192 (extraneous subheadings)

You already know I got to review one of your ideas now lmao, anyway here's my thoughts:

Miss Nye’s motivation: I get that she wants to escape, but why does she think the Foundation can help? Adding a bit more about what’s keeping her stuck or what she’s running from could really raise the stakes.

Connection between the show and the guests: I’m curious why certain people and anomalies get chosen. Does being on the show affect them in any way afterward, or is it just about telling their stories? It might feel more meaningful if there’s some impact on the guests.

Tone and genre: The story feels like a mix of mystery and surreal horror, which I really like. Maybe lean into one of those vibes a bit more—like if you want it to feel unsettling, make the interviews a bit creepier or surreal.

The purple letter: This is a cool detail! I wonder if you could do more with it. Maybe reading the letter makes people feel weird or messes with their sense of time. Just something small to give the letter more weight.

Re: AI Record - Death by Dusk by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 21:44

Agreed with AI-generation, particularly given the greenlight thread. The user's author post also reads like AI: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16983775/scp-8908#post-6726925

Watching this concept evolve into what it is today has been an incredible journey. My goal was to explore ethical principles, especially moderation, and how something seemingly beneficial can foster dependency and manipulation. It's a theme that holds a lot of relevance, and I'm excited to see how readers respond to it.

I want to thank all the critters who helped flesh out ideas and guided this SCP's evolution. Your feedback was invaluable.

Compare with the user's intro thread post: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16955457/october-2024-intros-explorers#post-6698241

Hello, I'm Death By Dusk maybe I'll write something maybe not, Read a couple articles here and there, maybe not.

Been a fan of SCP for almost 10 years now, and just decided to join. Don't ask why I'm lazy.

Incidentally, their other forum thread: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16968585/seeking-greenlight-feedback-therapeutic-car also appears to have AI-generated text in the interactions with reviewers. Specifically, examples like:

And an obvious indicator, this post: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16968585/seeking-greenlight-feedback-therapeutic-car#post-6698895 which has the following AI prompt remnant, which the author removed.

Here's a more polished version of your response:

Membership revoked, PM sent.

Re: AI Record - Death by Dusk by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 21:35

Agreed with AI-generation, particularly given the following excerpts:

SCP-8157 displays signs of intelligence, frequently seeking to exploit unlit areas or weak points in lighting to attempt containment breaches. It actively adapts to personnel movement and containment protocols, suggesting a heightened understanding of its surroundings. Although SCP-8157 cannot vocalize, it has demonstrated physical behaviors resembling frustration when its movements are restricted by containment measures.

Subsequent examination of the containment chamber identified several surface cracks and other potential vulnerabilities. Maintenance has since reinforced all surfaces with seamless, reinforced materials to prevent any future breaches. Since this incident, all lighting equipment in SCP-8157’s containment chamber is subject to daily inspection to detect any malfunctions or reductions in light output.

I would also support a yearlong ban for the dishonesty.

In the meantime, membership revoked, PM sent.

Re: AI Record - JoeyBoey by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 21:21

It was brought to staff attention that Dr HoudiniDr Houdini (account age 2 days, site membership 1 days) posted the article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-8126, which contained multiple indicators of AI-generation.

Notes: No Sandbox. Revision History indicates a completely different article was there at first before being completely changed in Revision 4 (the first content revision done by the author). Following that, Revision 5 adds more content, though this also contains hallmarks of AI usage.

Disc Team, please weigh in.

AI Record - Dr Houdini by ZoobeenyZoobeeny, 09 Nov 2024 17:45

Reads like AI. Supporting revocation.

Re: AI Record - Death by Dusk by KufatKufat, 09 Nov 2024 17:20

It was brought to staff attention that Death by DuskDeath by Dusk (account age 24 days, site membership 24 days) posted the article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-8908, which contained multiple indicators of AI-generation.


Finally, the user's Greenlight Request Thread: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16978704/seeking-greenlight-feedback-toy-story#post-6719089, contains hallmarks of AI generation:

Hook/Attention Grabber: The article explores themes of child neglect, the fear of sudden loss, and the danger posed by something as innocent as a child's toy. It serves as a chilling reminder of how easily trust can be manipulated and the hidden dangers lurking in everyday life.

Disc Team, please weigh in.

AI Record - Death by Dusk by ZoobeenyZoobeeny, 09 Nov 2024 17:19

User JoeyBoeyJoeyBoey (W/S: <1d, U: 9461477) posted SCP-8157, which was a pretty typical AI-generated page:

In response to a comment asking if it was AI-generated, JoeyBoey wrote:

no i didnt use ai to write this i have had this idea for a while and i had been writing it on a google doc and i made my account and pasted it from the google doc

im sorry if you think it is bad

The proficiency difference between the comments and article is striking. Zoobeeny and I are recommending summary deletion for AI usage and revocation at a minimum. If there's consensus that this falls under the dishonesty rule I'd recommend a yearlong ban.

AI Record - JoeyBoey by KufatKufat, 09 Nov 2024 15:52

Received the following reply:

So what was AI Generated?

Sent back:

The page you posted to the mainsite: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-8151 contained several hallmarks of AI-generated text, particularly the extraneous sections that are not present in any other SCP article. Thus far, only AI-written pages have been noted to insert those unnecessary subheadings.
Re: AI Record - BOBDaLoGS by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 07:14
Re: AI Record - Ax3lLight by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 07:12
Re: Non-Disc Record - Ax3lLight by ZynZyn, 09 Nov 2024 07:11
page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License