New user MackDaddy seems to demonstrate a tendency to overreact.
In response to the "joke article that is just a link discussion", they stated:
How about you, (oh, I don't know) create an article with a link to the video inside, like you said earlier?, with a voting module in the article allowing a proper downvote to oblivion? I'm willing to do it, (but you, zacnotzach will have to answer to its criticism, because it's not my article, and I'm going to downvote it anyways)
EDIT:I do not mean to be harsh, but you already suggested it, so why not do it?
When someone misread a post in one of their draft threads, they replied:
1. This is not a 001 proposal. What made you think that as a 1st time author I would make a 001 proposal of all things?
> It might make a good regular SCP if it's done right,
THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO!
I don't think I said anywhere the words "001" or "proposal" anywhere in my question, or sandbox.
> It might make a good regular SCP if it's done right,
Isn't that 99% of SCP Ideas
I've asked them to stop both times (regular post, not Mod Post), but if this continues, then we might be in warning territory. Keep an eye on this one.
Edit: Aaaaand, modposted. Apparently they're used to overreacting because YouTube. If they keep this up, I'm advocating a ban.