TechDoomsday has a history of backseat modding: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-3948685/non-disc-record-techdoomsday
- http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-3929318/scp-xxxx-doll-goblins#post-3609254
- http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-3864806/scp-data-expunged-j:the-data-expunged-switch#post-3606362
- http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-3951185/containment-breach-unforeseen-circumstances-a-soma-mod#post-3611117 (revoked for this)
- http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-3964550/an-idea-thats-been-stuck-in-my-head#post-3613451
- Today: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-2276582/scp-3061#post-3639954
[…]This criticism is not helpful and potentially harmful. I, as a user, urge you to read the scp guides before performing any more criticism. Had the creator taken your criticism, the article may have been further deteriorated.
[under a collapsible] The above can be seen as backseat modding, but backseat modding is defined as telling other users how to act on the site, I am only telling them how to improve their criticism.
This is not intentionally backseat modding in my perspective
Given the history of this behavior and the fact that they've gotten a revoke, dropped an official warning and sent them a PM. We move to bans on further infractions.
ETA: received reply. Am refraining from providing judgment on content.
Yeah, I know, you didn't need to remind me of previous staff intervention though.
Sorry about that, again. I won't try to do this stuff anymore. Unless I am staff of course which I know I probably wont be in at least a couple years span of time.Thanks for notifying me. -3-
(ps: This doesn't lose me any zyn-brownie points does it?)
