Noting that new site member Marker_pliers (account age and site membership 8 days) has been spamming vehement and immature comments in the forums and discussion threads:
In a critique thread: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18330663/seeking-greenlights-and-critique-abnormally-large-bolt#post-9047370
I like the simplicity but voters are assholes. Probably would have succeeded back in ye olden days but may get shot down now. Also, it's a little TOO basic. I know nothing and my one skip is failing so take my advice with a grain of salt.
In another critique thread: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18330845/seeking-green-lights-my-scp-concept#post-9047359
Pity is kinda hard to quantify. "Mother Nest" is pretty vague, is this caused by something memetic? Alien? Biological? Decent idea overall. However, I know nothing and my sole skip is at -10, so take my advice with a grain of salt.
In another critique thread: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18330913/let-me-speak-to-your-manager#post-9047319
I really like it, but i think it would work better as a dash J. I don't know anything though, my one skip is already at the deletion threshold.
In another critique thread: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18222598/seeking-greenlights-the-biggest-ball-of-twine#post-9047626
I like it, but I know nothing so idk. Zoobeeny says it's a "thing that does a thing". That is LITERALLY SCP-173, currently rated at over 11 thousand. I hate how standards have changed and how something that would be a classic in Series 1 is slop in Series 10, but I can't control the voters. Also the researcher thing seems kinda unnecessary.
On the Lowest Rated Pages list: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/lowest-rated-pages/comments/show#post-9047276 post title "What am I supposed to do?"
My article is at -10 and nobody's bothered to comment on why exactly it deserves to be deleted. I went through it and there's no formatting errors or anything. I still think it's a good article.
In another author's work's discussion thread: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9209/comments/show#post-9047742 post title "Can we do a critique swap?"
I read somewhere that if someone has a skip similar to what you're trying to write, you should reach out to them and do a swap or something. IDK if this is the officially correct way to do it. Could one of you look at my draft if it's not too much trouble? I like your skip and I hate to bother you. Thanks!
https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/markiplier-firstdraft
original forum post: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18330989/seeking-greenlights-and-review-dead-angel#post-9047457
Of note, none of their critique threads follow forum guidelines:
- http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18330575/seeking-greenlights-please-scp-9647-book-of-magic-items#post-9046231 full draft in concept critique forum
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18330638/seeking-greenlights-scp-9647-book-of-magic-items-2-6k full draft in draft forum without greenlights
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18330989/seeking-greenlights-and-review-dead-angel did not follow concept critique template
Also of note: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/how-dr-clef-contained-christmas/comments/show#post-9047489
A true work of art. I haven't laughed this hard since Bright's List and 666 1/2-J.
+1.
Membership revoked, PM sent.