Noting that new site member mkjna (account age 2 days, site membership 1 day) recently coldposted a page currently rated at -13 (and missing a rating module): https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-l017
Containment Procedures: SCP-L017 is to be kept in an 20x20x20cm bulletproof glass container at Site-██. The bottom of the glass box must be covered with soft red fabric.
Personal of Clearance Level 3 or higher, as well as, Class-D personal during authorized testing session are permitted of wearing SCP-L017.Description: SCP-L017 is an turquise ring measuring an diameter of about 1.8 centimeter.
When placed on the left ring finger, theres an about 70-80% propability of treating wounds or healing ilnesses. Permanent ilnesses are not affected.
They posted the following comments in the discussion thread:
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18329537/scp-l017#post-9043583
why are there so many downvotes guys cmon
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18329537/scp-l017#post-9044949 reply to reader comment "Lots of SPaG mistakes ("are permitted of wearing," random capitalization and of "Centimeter," "theres," sentence fragments like "Permanent ilnesses [sic] included") and it's just not very interesting or original."
not every scp needs to be a god with infinite powers and ultra keter thaumiel class, there are also boring ones, its getting deleted anyway. english was also not the first language i learned, i acknowledge my spelling mistakes but if thats the biggest problem this fandom/whatever has, its ok
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18329537/scp-l017#post-9044953 dobule-post reply to the same comment
this is the exact reason people use ai
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18329537/scp-l017#post-9045089 reply to comment "I'm sorry, but this is just rude and immature. You can have powerful, high-stakes skips or boring ones. What matters most when deciding whether an article is good or bad is the quality of the writing itself. Nobody is resorting to AI just because they were told their story was bad. You're encouraged to improve, and it's not like you're left on your own. Every authors are encouraged to seek critique in the Ideas Forum, Draft Forum, or by joining the 19cord, where they can get feedback from other authors. Maybe someone has resorted to AI, but if they did, that only proves they're a bad writer in the first place."
the scp wiki is about writing quality not creativity, i get it. i also know that it isnt the best article, but i really had an idea here, if people think that it wasnt a good one is also ok but what should i have done more? i thought the lost series is about scps which we have limited information for, because most documents are lost. im not trying to be rude and you know that, this is my first article and deleting it instead of saying what i could have done better and asking me to rewrite it is also very motivating to me. im sorry i didnt deliver up to your expectations. this aticle only gained "attention" is because its a low number scp, i i wouldve done SCP-L236 no one wouldve cared