Disciplinary - pastarasta1, ratking666

Summary:

Shitposting, bad crit, shitsniping

Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 27 Aug 2016 19:59

pastarasta1 does not match any existing user name has a history of posting unhelpful, problematic feedback. The behavior is more than well-established as recurrent, as noted in their non-disc thread: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-1683799

Today, they posted this to a low-rated coldpost: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1811453/scp-2283#post-2577086

"SPC"

Shark Punching Center called.

He wants his joke back.

They got called out by Shaggydredlocks and Kalinin. Fixed post to:

A paper that can talk reminds me too much of SCP-318 which in itself isn't a really good one.

There are a whole lot of misspells like "SPC" and it's just not a really fun read.

I dropped a long-overdue official warning and PMed them the same. Ban on next infraction, everyone's been cleaning up after this kid for enough time.

ETA: Got a reply

I will be reading the Criticism Policy again and I have taken note of my mistakes, I think I shouldn't really joke in my reviews.

Thank you for notifying me about my mistakes as I can understand why this is so troublesome now.

Last edited on 27 Aug 2016 20:25 by Zyn Show more

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 25 Oct 2016 19:51

…so, this happened. They posted the following comment on someone else's article:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1968418/scp-2535#post-2677104

Is "two-storey" a misspell?

They apparently went and made the edit anyway, and WJS jumped in to tell them it wasn't necessary.

They then "reverted" the change by making another edit, with the comment "CRAP REVERT SORRY".

/sigh

I mean, I guess it's well-meaning, but it doesn't really indicate conscientiousness, and now the edit history has that comment in it… welp. Hopefully they learned from it.

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 26 Oct 2016 02:08

Got a PM.

First of all, thank you for teaching me how to reverse a change you made.

Second of all, I will be more patient while waiting for an answer to my questions.

And third of all I am sorry for staining the page with that, I kinda got too panicy.

Love - pastarasta1 :)

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Decibelles 16 Dec 2016 04:49

pastarasta got staffposted on for jumping in and backseat modding a bit. Nothing real bad or egregious here, but I'm noting it here anyway.

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 18 Feb 2017 07:50

Recently they've started up with the bad crit again:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-2131109/monty-python-and-the-holy-grail#post-2749406

I think this looks pretty good.

I don't really see much wrong with it.

[then commented on an uncapitalized i]

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-2131562/lycan-the-protector#post-2749518

It's has really heavy tonal issues (lines like "strength level") and the picture is obviously drawn and even if it was an artist rendition it would still be kinda silly because it looks like something that would be on deviantart or furaffinity.

I recommend removing the picture and working more on tone. I also recommend reading the How to Write an SCP guide on the website if you haven't yet.

Oh and I don't recommend a Thamunial being your first SCP. Those are hard to write and not usually created by beginners. Not saying it's impossible but yeah.

Captain posted on both of those. They seem to be checking for replies though, so right now I'm not dropping a C&D. Still, keep an eye on.

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 16 May 2017 07:55

Problematic (vague) feedback:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-2280079/scp-xxxx-pumpkin-virus#post-2822007

Just seems like another "virus what turns you into things", and we already have a much better human pumpkin thingy which is SCP-2531.

Keep in mind I'm only criticizing the idea and not the article, so if you are looking for advice on spelling then I am sorry for not giving it to you.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-2276854/scp-xxxx-the-restaurant-that-never-was#post-2819276

I think this needs more attention, because I really like what you guys are going for, and I wish you the best of luck.

I enjoy this idea a lot, sorry for not having any advice.

Dropped a C&D on the second one and PMed. Also, it's been noticed that they've been making some immature posts lately as well:

• http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2305/comments/show#post-2820964 "in ur underwear XDDDD"
• http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-632383/scp-1312#post-2822018 "Result: Wet ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)"
• http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-632383/scp-1312#post-2822029 "NO DAD, YOU WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND MY AWESOME COMEDY!!!!"

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 16 May 2017 14:45

Got a reply:

Ok, from the info I have gotten, I am obviously not cut for reviews on there, so I will just cut out posting there unless it's a response to someone else.

Also sorry for the shitty jokes, they where kinda shitpost-ish.

I'm trying so hard not to make a mistake, I'm sorry.

Not entirely sure the message went through completely given that they still seen unaware of the magnitude of how much their recurring behavior is affecting how the community views them, but let's hope they improve from now on.

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 16 May 2017 18:26

…they replied to the closed admin post, evidently having not read or ignored the usual order about closed staff posts in the said post: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-2276854/scp-xxxx-the-restaurant-that-never-was#post-2823296

What do? They've already gotten the official warning, and the C&D that was long in arriving.

Last edited on 16 May 2017 18:27 by Zyn Show more

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

ProcyonLotor 16 May 2017 18:49

I think we all know the next step.

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

LilyFlower 16 May 2017 19:07

I'd have to reccomend a short ban- 72 hours to a week.

---

~🌸~Flower Power~🌸~

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 16 May 2017 20:13

Received the following PMs:

Zyn, this has got to be the most embarrassed I have ever been, I was calmed down and I started posting again, I look at your little staff post and thought "oh i really like that advice" and I was so cooled down that I didn't even noticed it said not to respond.

Am I going to be banned? I know I have a chance, and I really don't want it to be week long.

All I am saying is that I'm scared, I don't want to be banned because I love being here, If I went away it could effect me negatively, and when I said "I don't want a week long ban" I meant if you where going to ban me, week long would basically kill me.

I mean, like you remember when I said that drawing was a cope? This site is kinda alsoa cope.

Makes sense.

Well, if I'm going to get banned, might as well go out in a bang.

I love you, I love this website, and everyone that contributed to it, goodbye.

Also just a few questions, does banning mean you can't do anything on the site that would require an account, like rating?

I rather you just post this response, but you can tell them a snippet of what I said.

I relied to the first two with variants of the statement, "if you break the rules, you incur disciplinary action" and the third I replied with "don't make this an attention-grabbing thing like you were spoken to about before" and a quick explanation of a ban.

Does someone else want to handle this?

ETA:

Huh, I meant bang as in that I love you thingy, which I guess was attention seeking.

Thank you for answering my question, see you in a week I guess.

PM titled "I would like to be banned for 1 week"

This is my permission to be banned for one week, I have thought about it and I would just like to be banned about now.

Last edited on 16 May 2017 20:45 by Zyn Show more

Re: Disciplinary - pastarasta1

Zyn 19 Jun 2018 01:48

Noting that in response to recent events, they've made some ill-advised posts that have attracted some ire:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2721/comments/show#post-3840344

I am annoyed that you literally joined this site JUST to post this tbh.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1757068/scp-2721#post-3840296 (Magnus modposted for backseat modding)

dude, calm down, it’s one SCP in a sea of millions of others.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1757068/scp-2721#post-3840340

Wait, when did this SCP have anything to do with being gay?

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-6179567/rpc-authority-website#post-3840917

I to, leave sites when they tell me not to be homophobic.

Tossing this up for records keeping given the user's history. While it's good to be supportive, staff is already in a not-great spot so far as responses have been. The community should endeavor to not jump immediately to accusations.