Noting for records-keeping that the user sent the following reply to the ban message:
I thought it was banned in canon tales & SCP files, or other main facets pertaining to SCP lore?
The forum is not official, it doesn't make ant sense worrying AI will taint the integrity of it's flow… every tool has it's effective place.
I wasn't aware SCP fans were all a bunch o unreasonable luddites?
You don't require any mimetic hazard exposure events if paranoia is voluntarily accepted wholeheartedly!!
★
Just to be clear… it is really nauseating & abhorrent when a group of people who occupy an artistic/intellectual niche completely reject a useful technology, despite a positive contributive capacity.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY is no excuse, since causality will always return to it's origin & cannot be cut by a lack of anal (attentive/meticulous) behavior.
I advise you to halt your delusional & potentially nonsensical practices and embrace a sensible methodology œ technological health, or else I or anybody of dignity {standards} will care fuckall about your deranged community… then the day will come that the worthy SCP mainstream will eschew you.
When addressed about the mainsite forums being official, and whether the text they submitted being their appeal, they replied:
No, just include the bolded area below.
By official, I meant canon-etching.
**AI is vector-compensation, the fundamental vectors therein must be & can only be (lest it become disoriented) true sentient originality {ego-originating creativity}.
It is extremely effective at mitigating creative stress by removing menial tasks, & subsequent content that is not of sufficient quality can simply be rejected thereto.
These originality-vectors are the source of an AI's effective existence, and they cannot exist absent them; but being compelled to pay for the whole well of original data therein is asking these companies to simply cease to exist ({after throwing money}).**
