This thread is for the listing of new issues with redbubble (the old thread was a bit cluttered).
This link will allow you to check for new products: http://www.redbubble.com/shop/recent+scp?ref=sort_order_change_recent
This thread is for the listing of new issues with redbubble (the old thread was a bit cluttered).
This link will allow you to check for new products: http://www.redbubble.com/shop/recent+scp?ref=sort_order_change_recent
Just for formatting reasons, new sets of products will go in their own reply. Discussion and resolution of those product issues will be replies to this reply.
Currently unresolved products:
None.
Bubblemails have been sent to Magentablimp already. Will update as that develops.
Magentablimp's products have all been updated properly. So that one's finished for the time being.
This product doesn't list the license (it does link back properly though).
Bubblemail sent. They've been receptive to messages before so I don't see this being a big problem.
Realized I forgot to update this. Guy in this post has updated properly.
Well, here's a very long list. Here we go:
http://www.redbubble.com/people/mothermarowak/works/23930513-scp-513-a-cowbell
(don't reference 173 directly even though there's no image, to err on the safe side, I think)
In general, this user is aware of the licensing parameters; however, there are these few where they've slipped up and not mentioned the actual, y'know, licensing parameters. (They link to the wiki but don't mention CC or anything.)
http://www.redbubble.com/people/raildur/works/22894015-scp-poster?grid_pos=50&p=sticker
http://www.redbubble.com/people/raildur/works/22893988-scp-sign?grid_pos=57&p=sticker
http://www.redbubble.com/people/xebec/works/22850334-scp-warning-higgs-field?grid_pos=58&p=sticker
http://www.redbubble.com/people/xebec/works/22849495-scp-warning-antimatter?grid_pos=59&p=sticker
http://www.redbubble.com/people/xebec/works/22915104-scp-warning-gluon-threat?grid_pos=116&p=sticker
http://www.redbubble.com/people/agentkulu/works/21608887-scp-131?grid_pos=105&p=t-shirt&style=mens
http://www.redbubble.com/people/agentkulu/works/21609051-scp-999?grid_pos=106&p=t-shirt&style=mens
http://www.redbubble.com/people/agentkulu/works/21609007-scp-106?grid_pos=107&p=t-shirt&style=mens
http://www.redbubble.com/people/agentkulu/works/21609118-scp-173-j?grid_pos=136&p=t-shirt&style=mens REMOVE
http://www.redbubble.com/people/agentkulu/works/21627382-scp-513-1?grid_pos=138&p=t-shirt&style=mens
http://www.redbubble.com/people/agentkulu/works/21667515-chibi-scp-096-small?grid_pos=139&p=sticker
http://www.redbubble.com/people/agentkulu/works/21608928-untitled?grid_pos=173&p=t-shirt&style=mens
This one is questionable - we know they're referencing when Markiplier played Containment Breach, and that's definitely an image of 513.
http://www.redbubble.com/people/monkey2717/works/23219681-containment-breach?grid_pos=151&p=t-shirt&style=mens REMOVE or alter to get 173 out of the design
http://www.redbubble.com/people/thatbitchdarky6/works/22540696-plague-doctor?grid_pos=153&p=sticker
Hi there! I'm Cyantreuse, staff on the SCP Foundation wiki's licensing branch. The following works need to be updated in the artist's notes section to accurately reference CC licensing parameters:
(links)
Ideally, your paragraph should read something like this:
Content relating to the SCP Foundation, including the SCP Foundation logo, is licensed under Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0 and all concepts originate from http://www.scp-wiki.net.
If your work references a specific article, it should link back to said article and reference said article's author in a similar format, with a hyperlink to the article in question. Please note that works depicting SCP-173, SCP-111, and SCP-1926 are not permitted to be commercialized, and as such must be removed entirely.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to let me know, and happy arting!
Thank you,
Cyantreuse
Sent BubbleMail to:
SuperSlytherin
Monkey 2717
Agent Kulu
Raildur
vandalmakesstuf
mothermarowak
Narshero, Thatbitchdarky6, and kgbigelowart were not contacted, as other members of Licensing advised me that their works were vague in reference to the SCP wiki and thus did not technically violate anything.
Got fixes from AgentKulu and mothermarowak. No word yet from vandalmakesstuf, SuperSlytherin, or Raildur. Monkey 2717 asked me the following:
I felt I could be a bit cheeky with this but ,I did want to make sure I avoid getting myself in trouble
(this is it edited and i’m hoping it will do) http://imgur.com/a/aMXEs
thank you for the concern
-monkey2717
I responded with the following:
Hey there, it’s Cyan again. My team say that you’re safest either redacting 173’s entire face (simply the facial features are enough for concern, including the mouth) or switching him to 303, the Doorman, who is similar in appearance.
Thanks again,
Cyantreuse
SuperSlytherin has fixed their work(s), but still no fixes from vandalmakesstuf or Raildur. Monkey2717 has updated the work in question to redact 173's entire face, and has added CC info in the artist notes as per request.
Fixes from Raildur. The only person who has not responded or fixed anything is vandalmakesstuf. With confirmation from Cimm, I messaged Vandal on Tumblr as well due to their lack of response. Hopefully we'll get a fix soon, as Vandal is the only one left before we can close this batch!
Edit: And Vandal has fixed the products. We're all clean here.
Edit 2: I was checking behind myself and realized Xebec and KlassyBox's things (from the first post in this sub-thread) are still unfixed; I'd overlooked them because they don't allow messaging. Stand by.
Two new ones, not too big a deal.
Hi there! I'm Cyantreuse, staff on the SCP Foundation wiki's licensing branch. The following works need to be updated in the artist's notes section to accurately reference CC licensing parameters:
Ideally, your paragraph should read something like this:
Content relating to the SCP Foundation, including the SCP Foundation logo, is licensed under Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0 and all concepts originate from http://www.scp-wiki.net.
If your work references a specific article, it should link back to said article and reference said article's author in a similar format, with a hyperlink to the article in question. Please note that works depicting SCP-173, SCP-111, and SCP-1926 have special commercialization parameters, and as such, you should read http://www.scp-wiki.net/licensing-guide in its entirety to err on the safe side of sales.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to let me know, and happy arting!
Thank you,
Cyantreuse
and
http://www.redbubble.com/people/toadkingstudios/works/24866270-scp-area-under-observation?grid_pos=5&p=sticker
^ artist doesn't allow BubbleMail. Know the name around the fandom; will contact on Tumblr or elsewhere as per one of the last cases of someone not allowing BubbleMail. Stand by. | edit: messaged on one of their Tumbles.
http://www.redbubble.com/people/toadkingstudios/works/24866270-scp-area-under-observation?grid_pos=5&p=sticker has been fixed after the owner replied to me on Tumblr. This set closed; shall keep thread open for future ones as per the standard.
oh god a flood of new SCP stuff happened in the one week I was busy moving out of my apartment and not looking at RB for once, because of course it did
both of these were sent to the user House Cotehele
Hi there! I'm Cyantreuse, staff on the SCP Foundation wiki's licensing branch. The following works need to be updated in the artist's notes section to accurately reference CC licensing parameters:
https://www.redbubble.com/people/dancotehele/works/25270946-sandcandp?asc=t&p=t-shirt
Ideally, your paragraph should read something like this:
Content relating to the SCP Foundation, including the SCP Foundation logo, is licensed under Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0 and all concepts originate from http://www.scp-wiki.net.
If your work references a specific article, it should link back to said article and reference said article's author in a similar format, with a hyperlink to the article in question. Please note that works depicting SCP-173, SCP-111, and SCP-1926 have special commercialization parameters, and as such, you should read http://www.scp-wiki.net/licensing-guide in its entirety to err on the safe side of sales.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to let us know.
Thank you,
Cyantreuse
Pardon the follow-up, oops! I overlooked these in my previous PM to you; my apologies. The following works also need to be updated:
https://www.redbubble.com/people/dancotehele/works/25166685-are-we-cool-yet?grid_pos=10&p=t-shirt&style=mens
https://www.redbubble.com/people/dancotehele/works/25166446-church-of-the-broken-god?grid_pos=11&p=t-shirt&style=mens (I see that you have some licensing information in this one, but it's somewhat incomplete, so please update it if you do not mind.)
Same as in the last message, your paragraph should read something like this:
Content relating to the SCP Foundation, including the SCP Foundation logo, is licensed under Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0 and all concepts originate from http://www.scp-wiki.net.
Thanks again,
Cyantreuse
https://www.redbubble.com/people/twlboaj/works/25206208-scp-173?grid_pos=9&p=sticker This one has 173 in it and the artist doesn't allow BubbleMail. I'll check with 34 and see which of us will file the takedown with RedBubble.
Got a reply and fixes from House Cotehele. Stand by for the 173 takedown. (Vince told me to tell Procy to do it, I'll go throw something at him and then we'll be closed for this round.)
Zombiemellon updated theirs. The only thing remaining now is that 173 takedown from February. Again, Procy or Vince, if you will just show me how to do it, it would have already been done… ;P Additionally, I see nothing wrong with sending a BubbleMail just asking the person to take it down, and referencing the licensing facts, but it's up to you guys if you'd rather just go straight to official takedown. Edit: Apparently I can't remember the contents of my own forum posts. I now recall that this particular artist doesn't allow BubbleMail.
DMCA for the 173 product has been sent.
Work in question has been removed by Redbubble. That's some turn-around speed, there.
Cool and Good. Batch closed until the next one shows up.
New ones.
https://www.redbubble.com/people/languidlustre/works/25845687-scp-d-class-personnel?grid_pos=2&p=t-shirt&style=mens
https://www.redbubble.com/people/languidlustre/works/25847575-scp-d-class-personnel-left-alignment?grid_pos=1&p=sticker
This uploader doesn't allow BubbleMail, so I went ahead and left the following in the comments of them, as we sometimes do.
Hey there! Cyantreuse on the Licensing Team here. If you could add "Content relating to the SCP Foundation, including the SCP Foundation logo, is licensed under Creative Commons Sharealike 3.0 and all concepts originate from http://www.scp-wiki.net" in the artist notes section, it would be appreciated, and would bring this work into compliance with our licensing parameters. Let us know if you have any questions, and thank you.
Will update if it changes.
Both of these have been fixed. And they even put a little heart beside the licensing paragraph, aww. This batch closed.
New one from someone on reddit:
www.redbubble.com/people/thewebchimp/works/33081512-scp-049-the-plague-doctor
Edit: Posted on the reddit thread, text here:
Hi, I'm JS on the licensing team here. Just letting you know that you need to comply with the CC-BY-SA license. If you need help with that send me a PM or look here: www.scp-wiki.net/licensing-guide
To be clear, this isn't an order to stop this, you just need to comply with the license.
(Reformatted link to post here)
Update: Fix link
got a heads up from pyropyrope on the Licensing chat for a couple more items with 173: https://www.redbubble.com/shop/scp+173?cat_context=u-prints&ref=search_box
Just checking, we do have a Licensing Team redbubble account, right?