Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Summary:

Sockpuppeting (also spam, incoherence, bad feedback)

Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Zyn 24 Jul 2016 06:36

One site member has been confirmed to be using three accounts: drsciants, drquartz, and Drblackbox does not match any existing user name. Non-Disc thread here: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-1603126

Deci noted similarities in their characteristic posting style, of a phrase ending in a comma followed by an unnecessary carriage indent.

From chat history, drquartz and Drblackbox match info:
moc.rr.ser.submuloc.B1104027-CRInys|xobkcalbrd#moc.rr.ser.submuloc.B1104027-CRInys|xobkcalbrd
moc.rr.ser.submuloc.B1104027-CRInys|ztrauqrd#moc.rr.ser.submuloc.B1104027-CRInys|ztrauqrd

I've sent a PM telling them to pick one account to use for the site. If they lie about the sockpuppeting or refuse to stop using more than one account, we move to permaban.

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Zyn 24 Jul 2016 06:50

Got a PM reply:

Sorry, I try to have multiple accounts for most websites,
I'll only use drblackbox from now on.

I've blocked sciants and quartz from the sandbox. Can I get an admin to block those accounts from the mainsite?

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

DrEverettMann 24 Jul 2016 08:41

The additional accounts have been banned.

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Decibelles 28 Aug 2016 05:37

Shitposted in a coldpost:

The more I see these articals the more wrongjhonsilver should write an essay,
Everything this does wrong he¹ Knows exactly why it doesn't work.

I staff-posted:

Failing SCPs are not an excuse to shitpost and make contentless, unnecessary posts that do not benefit the author, the community, or yourself in any way, shape, or form. Please reread the Criticism Policy and get acquainted with the difference between constructive criticism and effortless posting.

EDIT: Opening a ban-vote due to repeated incidents. Weeklong.

Footnotes

1. She?

Last edited on 28 Aug 2016 05:44 by Decibelles Show more

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Zyn 28 Aug 2016 05:47

Seconding for weeklong.

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

TroyL 28 Aug 2016 06:11

Concurring.

---

"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Zyn 28 Aug 2016 06:21

TroyL banned, I sent PM.

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

WrongJohnSilver 29 Aug 2016 15:47

The more I see these articals the more wrongjhonsilver should write an essay,
Everything this does wrong he¹ Knows exactly why it doesn't work.

I'm somehow simultaneously honored and disappointed.

Footnotes

1. She?

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

(account deleted) 30 Sep 2016 03:25

Dude came into 17, can we get an unban please

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

TroyL 30 Sep 2016 06:46

Unbanned.

---

"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Zyn 21 Nov 2018 08:31

Noting that they've continued to post low-quality feedback in the forums (typically the Ideas and Brainstorming threads) even after their C&D from 2016:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-8764965/solitary-confinement-cell-that-forces-starvation#post-4064094

You know a super-Cristian would make sense too.

And in that same thread they compare "A solitary confinement cell that makes it so food can't be given to people inside of it, and that they are incapable of dying from starvation while steadily increasing the pain they feel from hunger" to SCP-4000 because "all of those still hold that core concept".

I've left an admin post reminding them of the C&D and sent a PM. I'm not going to bother digging for other instances where they slipped under the radar recently since they're a repeat problem user and they've gotten called out plenty by the authors they replied to (as is the case in the thread above).

Keep an eye on. We may need to move to bans again.

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Zyn 15 Dec 2018 09:38

Noting that as of late, they seem to be making some intentionally questionable posts:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-343/comments/show#post-4086659

I've always been slightly disturbed by how many people on the wiki don't "get" that it's a clearly malicious entity manipulating staff.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-343/comments/show#post-4086692

I pretty clearly remember back when I used /r/SCP a bunch of people not understanding why we don't just let 343 go.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-9382210/what-is-going-to-happen-to-the-scp-tumblr-s-with-the-oncomin

As I understand it Tumblr is going to be removing relatively lite-NSFW (aka boobs), so does that mean the SCP-related Tumblr pages could be under-risk considering how very very NSFW the wiki can be and by extension the art related to it?

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-9382210/what-is-going-to-happen-to-the-scp-tumblr-s-with-the-oncomin#post-4086513

Well there's already a big protest going on and it's going to throw a wrench into the meme cycle but that's apparently not enough to stop it, so I doubt asking nicely will do much.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-001/comments/show#post-4080169

You realize you just killed half the memes on /r/DMFS19 right?

Re: Disciplinary - drsciants / drquartz / Drblackbox

Zyn 25 Jun 2025 07:31

Noting that as the user received a nomination for the Reviewers' Spotlight recently, they asked if they could use the mainsite critique forums again.

After discussing with staff, the consensus was to lift the cease-and-desist from years ago. User has been informed via PM that they can use the critique forums.

Mooagain, Revan, and Ori supporting.