Purpose:
On February 18th 2026, the Disciplinary Team received a complaint regarding 
HarryBlank's behavior toward other users during discussion of the ongoing Bright Works Project. After initial discussion, the complaint was determined to warrant disciplinary review proceedings.
Claims:
This section will break down the claims levied against HarryBlank and the evidence found to support those claims.
HarryBlank engaged in excessively hostile behavior towards fellow users.
Following a comment made by 
Fish^12 under a discussion thread regarding the specific approach to be taken in the Bright Works Project, Harry responded and began an extended argument which quickly devolved into increasingly hostile behavior from both sides.
Evidence Link: Comment and Resulting Discussion
Later that same night, Harry entered into an argument with 
psychicprogrammer in the Canonexus Discord server, of which Harry is a staff member, during which Harry repeatedly insulted psychicprogrammer, demeaning the latter's behavior as a member of staff. Notably, while Fish^12 is also a former member of staff, the character of Harry's argument with Fish^12 differs from his argument with psychicprogrammer in that the latter was insulted specifically in the framing of their staff work, whereas the former was not demeaned as a former member of staff, but as a user of the wiki and member of the community.
Evidence:
[8:27 AM]
psychicprogrammer: This is why I said we should have a retrospective in 6 months
psychicprogrammer: Because I don't trust staff to do this properly
[8:34 AM]
HarryBlank: You'd do a great job though right
HarryBlank: What would you do, automate DMing the victims
HarryBlank: You only care because you're still mad Queerious had to babysit you after you fucked up over and over and refused to improve\
HarryBlank: Why else would you care about this specifically Psy
HarryBlank: It's obvious
HarryBlank: Be honest
HarryBlank: Come on
HarryBlank: Admit it
[8:38 AM]
psychicprogrammer: My plan was on 05 a year ago[[footnote]]This message was a reply to the message reading "What would you do, automate DMing the victims"[[/footnote]]
psychicprogrammer: 1: unlist all of the works by bright
psychicprogrammer: 2: Post a redirect to the bright deletion page in the 963 slot
[8:39 AM]
psychicprogrammer: ????????[[footnote]]This message was a reply to the message reading "You only care because you're still mad Queerious had to babysit you after you fucked up over and over and refused to improve\"[[/footnote]]
psychicprogrammer: I barely interacted Queer post deletion
psychicprogrammer: Demotion
[8:40 AM]
HarryBlank: It's ego
HarryBlank: Let's criticize someone else
[8:40 AM]
psychicprogrammer: The buck stops with the person in charge[[footnote]]This message was a reply to the message reading "Why else would you care about this specifically Psy"[[/footnote]]
[8:40 AM]
HarryBlank: Not when literally everyone else does sweet fuck all[[footnote]]This message was edited. Its content before the edit is unknown.[[/footnote]]
HarryBlank: She's not the fucking president
HarryBlank: This is a fucking website
HarryBlank: Get out of your own ass
[8:41 AM]
psychicprogrammer: That is what we call a management problem
[8:41 AM]
HarryBlank: You're not a guru
HarryBlank: You're a record of like ten abhorrent staff mistakes that would have been easily avoided if you ever, ever, ever checked your work
HarryBlank: And you refuse to grow from that
HarryBlank: Who are you to give advice on doing things right
HarryBlank: What have you done correctly
HarryBlank: Just keep heaping abuse on the only person who actually weathered it to get work done
HarryBlank: She's a fucking superhero
HarryBlank: Big party to kick the only person who actuallly cared enough to do something
HarryBlank: The only thing that needs investigating is why everyone else is so fucking lazy
HarryBlank: A whole society of people who just want to review what other people do
HarryBlank: Nobody wants to do anything
HarryBlank: Because surprise, this wasn't fun to do
HarryBlank: Why did it take seven months? Because nobody helped.
HarryBlank: That's it.
HarryBlank: That's all.
HarryBlank: Anything else is just larping for clout.
[8:47 AM]
psychicprogrammer: I have a list there, the problem is friction.
psychicprogrammer: There was a lot of enthusiasm at the start, this was wasted on large sweeping projects that were unessicary. Did we need to complete inventory of ever back link (that was partally my fault) or a list of how every bright article was bad. Not in the slightest
[8:47 AM]
HarryBlank: There was no enthusiasm in the form of actually doing the work. I was there from the start.
[8:48 AM]
psychicprogrammer: So was I Blank
[8:48 AM]
HarryBlank: The simple phase of reviewing the works? I did like half of that because nobody wanted to
HarryBlank: That was the HIGH POINT of activity
[8:48 AM]
psychicprogrammer: Yes hence friction
[8:48 AM]
HarryBlank: Nobody did the work because nobody wanted to
HarryBlank: It was not difficult it was unpleasant
HarryBlank: I don't fault people for hoping someone else would do it
HarryBlank: That's still not Queerious' fault
HarryBlank: I don't care if she's willing to be the fall person for this, nobody signs up for this level of abuse
HarryBlank: From all these comfortable armchairs
HarryBlank: This was an institutional failure
HarryBlank: It was not an individual one
HarryBlank: And people are spreading lies that make them feel superior
HarryBlank: And I am done with it
It is the opinion of both the Disciplinary and Administration Teams that the above messages and behavior are unfit for the standards by which admins are expected to engage with the community. The behavior in the thread only served to stoke an already heated argument further, while his messages towards psychicprogrammer are undeservedly harsh and unacceptable.
Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Disciplinary Team that HarryBlank receive the following consequences:
For behavior unfitting of a member of staff:
- A four month censure from staff as a whole.
- Demotion to the rank of operational staff upon his return.
These are only recommendations. Any staff member in this thread may support these suggestions, offer an alternative, or advocate for no action to be taken.
Process:
The specifics of this punishment and the passage thereof are the subject of this thread and open to discussion. In line with our current charter, the punishment given to Harry will be whatever the consensus is among staff present for this discussion. If the staff body determines Harry should receive a more lenient punishment counter to what is recommended above, it will be enacted. For clarity and ease of tallying, please bold your suggested punishment.
Please note that Harry is granted the opportunity to defend his actions within this thread as stated by the demotions procedure in the charter.
This thread will be open for seven days and is open to OS+. Any questions or concerns regarding the process of demotion should be sent to 
pr0m37h3um or another member of the disciplinary committee. Please remain civil and on topic.
