AI Record - Doctor D Exotic

Forum » Rule Application & Record-Keeping / AI Records » AI Record - Doctor D Exotic

Started by:

Kufat
Date: 23 Jan 2026 17:37
Number of posts: 2

RSS: New posts

Summary:

Admitted AI use in sandbox

Unfold All Fold All More Options

Fold

AI Record - Doctor D Exotic

Kufat 23 Jan 2026 17:37

Noting that site member Doctor D Exotic (W: 1587 days, S: 1587 days, ID: 7665366) recently posted a sandbox that contains indicators of AI-generation: https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/doctor-d-exotic-1 (specifically, the first tab)

+ show block

Relevant #site17 conversation:

+ show block

Excerpts of note:

Note: Asked AI to help brainstorm some names for The Scarlet King. Adapt and use as I see fit.

Permanent ban implemented, notified via IRC.

Reply Options

Unfold AI Record - Doctor D Exotic by

Kufat, 23 Jan 2026 17:37

Fold

Re: AI Record - Doctor D Exotic

Kufat 24 Jan 2026 01:48

User appealed their ban in #site17. (Unrelated messages removed.)

+ show block

– hide block

[12:04:57] * DoctorDExotic (Doctor@SCP-oui.3jp.116.177.IP) has joined #site17
[12:19:30] <drblackbox> Any critstaff on right now?
[12:20:45] <%discord-bridge> <oritiefling> drblackbox what’s up
[12:21:07] <drblackbox> Got a sandbox that apparently used AI for brainstorming, felt like I should report it.
[12:21:13] <drblackbox> https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/doctor-d-exotic-1
[12:21:15] <drblackbox> First tab.
[12:21:28] <%discord-bridge> <oritiefling> I’ll send it to the AI folks, thank you!
[12:21:35] <drblackbox> np
[12:21:37] <Onigura> saw that too i was miffed
[12:21:58] <%discord-bridge> <oritiefling> In the meantime I encourage yall to not provide crit
[12:22:06] <drblackbox> Noted.
[12:22:07] <Onigura> aight
[12:26:10] <DoctorDExotic> That is mine. Let me elaborate: the AI was solely used for helping me brainstorm the names that appear in the first tab.
[12:28:20] <%discord-bridge> <oritiefling> The use of generative AI is not permitted to create user-facing content, and as far as crit is concerned we are not interested in reviewing content you didn’t make
[12:33:12] <DoctorDExotic> It wasn't used to create the user-facing content. It was used solely for helping me brainstorm the names that appear in the first tab. The thing that needs critique, which is the second and third tabs, were created by me, without the help of generative AI.
[12:38:15] <&Kufat> DoctorDExotic, you have been permanently banned for generative AI use. You may appeal this ban here or by DMing a member of the Disciplinary team on Wikidot.
[12:39:33] <DoctorDExotic> I appeal.
[12:39:56] <DoctorDExotic> Where is my right to defend myself and my work?
[12:40:55] <&Kufat> That's what the appeal is for. Remember that the list you created counts as user-facing content since it's part of the body of a page rather than the source. Please tell us why you believe your ban should be shortened or lifted, and let us know when you're done. (I have to step away for a while but I'll read when I return.)
[12:53:00] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: I have some questions. The first tab is user-facing content, and all of the other tabs are not? If that brainstormed list of names for the Scarlet King was on the second tab, for example, I wouldn't have been banned? If so, I say that is not fair, because what is the difference between "being part of the body of the page" and "being at the
[12:53:00] <DoctorDExotic> source of the page"? And how can one small list of names, only present in the first tab, completely nullify all of my hard work, clearly noticeable by seeing any of the other tabs??? Show any of the other tabs to the AI Team, and they will know that NO AI is capable of writing what I wrote!
[12:57:48] <&Kufat-viplounge> It didn't matter which tab it's on
[12:58:18] <&Kufat-viplounge> It doesn't matter if you only used AI in one place
[13:00:32] * DoctorDExotic (Doctor@SCP-oui.3jp.116.177.IP) Quit (The Lounge - hosted by hexick.com)
[13:08:52] * DoctorDExotic (Doctor@SCP-oui.3jp.116.177.IP) has joined #site17
[13:09:30] <DoctorDExotic> The Lounge disconnected me. I'm back.
[13:09:54] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat, allow me to start with one question at a time
[13:10:35] <DoctorDExotic> What defines a "user-facing content"?
[13:10:44] <&Kufat-viplounge> Okay. In case you missed my responses, it doesn't matter which tab it's on and it doesn't matter if you only used AI in one place. 
[13:11:13] <DoctorDExotic> Why is that?
[13:11:21] <&Kufat-viplounge> Anything visible without viewing the page source. Images, media, and text displayed anywhere in an article
[13:13:14] <&Kufat-viplounge> Why is what? 
[13:14:59] <DoctorDExotic> Why, according to you, it doesn't matter that "if you only used AI in one place."?
[13:16:24] <&Kufat-viplounge> Refer to the site rules; there's nothing in the AI rule that only applies to "heavy" or "frequent" AI use, etc. 
[13:17:44] <DoctorDExotic> Can you send me the link for the specific rules around AI?
[13:18:54] <&Kufat-viplounge> .s site rules 
[13:18:55] <+crom> Kufat-viplounge: Site Rules (+82, written over 16 years ago by Staff) - https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/site-rules
[13:22:31] <DoctorDExotic> I'll be back to you in a sec
[13:37:38] <DoctorDExotic> Very well, since I only brainstormed a list of names for The Scarlet King, my appeal continues. How may I proceed through "the standard disciplinary proccess"?
[13:39:59] <&Kufat> You're appealing your ban now. As mentioned, that means explaining to staff why you feel that your ban should be shortened or lifted.
[13:47:16] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: How does this AI Team know to differentiate one normal text from one that is generated by AI?
[13:54:42] <&Kufat> We keep track of certain tells that only appear in AI-generated articles. It's not really relevant to this particular appeal since you've already admitted to AI use, though.
[13:58:17] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: Therefore, I appeal to good faith. Those names are harmless; they do not make any story, or article, or anything, alone; and if they are deleted from the page, there is nothing else to find faults in.
[14:07:10] <&Kufat> Anything else you want to add as part of your appeal?
[14:13:18] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: the rules of the site are liable to change in the circumstance of new exceptions to the rules. If this can't be appealed by "good faith", despite clearly being able to, I am the exception to the rules. As such, they must be altered accordingly to include "good faith" as a valid appeal in the case of every and any use of AI in the SCP Wiki.
[14:14:28] <&Kufat> OK. To be clear, are you saying that if the rules disallow your actions, the problem is the rules rather than your actions?
[14:22:41] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: In addition, I can guarantee that, if the people responsible for detecting AI search every part of the page except the first tab, they will find ZERO use of AI. They will only find a HUMAN'S months of hard work, a HUMAN'S skillful writing that NO AI can replicate, and a HUMAN'S CSS knowledge. Finally, I compromise to never use AI again, not
[14:22:41] <DoctorDExotic> even for harmless name-making. If this appeal isn't valid, the rules MUST change in order to remain fair for everyone.
[14:23:43] <&Kufat> I'll pass it along to the rest of the team.
[14:25:14] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: Thank you. How will you keep me updated?
[14:25:20] <&Kufat> Wikidot PM
[14:26:54] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: Can you send in my PM hpw you wrote my appeal?
[14:28:52] <&Kufat> DoctorDExotic, I don't know what you mean. You wrote your appeal; I didn't. The team will review the log of this entire conversation.
[14:29:08] <DoctorDExotic> Very well
[14:30:00] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: How long is this process expected to take?
[14:31:02] <&Kufat> I think it'll be handled pretty quickly, hopefully within a day or two
[14:38:44] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat: So you also are expecting them to accept my appeal in good faith. If they don't validate this appeal, I don't have a problem coming back and appealing again and again until my ban is permanently lifted, and the rules of the site encompass my case. It will be one of the most extreme cases of injustice otherwise.
[14:41:10] <%discord-bridge> <oritiefling> DoctorDExotic no implication was made either way towards Kufat agreeing to accept or deny. It’s a full team decision regardless. You will hear back within the week, you may reach out again if you don’t.
[14:43:03] <DoctorDExotic> discord-bridge: Elaborate on "within the week". Until today 23:59? Until Saturday 23:59? Until Sunday 23:59? And on which UTC?
[14:43:33] <&Kufat> DoctorDExotic, you're being obnoxious. Please knock it off.
[14:44:21] <DoctorDExotic> Kufat, I know my rights. I deserve to know about every bit of the process if you can provide it.
[14:47:25] <&Kufat> DoctorDExotic, you're being banned from #site17 for 24 hours for your attitude and extreme entitlement. Staff will contact you regarding your appeal.
[14:50:04] <DoctorDExotic> Extreme entitlement? This is just a human on trial by a private non-government jurisdiction, demanding information. There is nothing here that confirms "extreme entitlement".
[14:50:04] * DoctorDExotic was kicked by Secretary_Helen (Bad behavior during appeal)

Doctor D Exotic received a 24-hour ban from #site17. Staff voted 5-0 against accepting the appeal, and I have notified them of that fact. They may appeal again on January 23, 2027.

Reply Options

Unfold Re: AI Record - Doctor D Exotic by

Kufat, 24 Jan 2026 01:48

New Post

O5 Command

Administration and Management

Staff Information

Staff Utilities

SCP Wiki Links

05Command

SCP Wiki