Disciplinary - Dr Calasanti

Summary:

Vehemence towards feedback on mainsite page

Disciplinary - Dr Calasanti

Zyn 06 Oct 2025 07:00

Noting that new site member Dr Calasanti (account age 2 days) recently coldposted a page and upon receiving feedback, responded with excessive vehemence and personal remarks:

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17304959/scp-8561#post-7266348

YOU NEVER DO ANYTHING ORIGINALLY, NO ONE DOES.
You have no room to be a critic, when you yourself do absolutely NOTHING.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17304959/scp-8561#post-7266577

YK what, I'm deleting this whole thing, apparently it's so bad that everyone hates it.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17304959/scp-8561#post-7267292

I honestly don't think you should be talking.
Tell me, which original SCP articles have you written?

As of now, the page has been deleted. Thank you to the site member who reported the case for preserving the links and comment content.

User's membership has been revoked, PM sent.

Re: Disciplinary - Dr Calasanti

Zyn 07 Oct 2025 05:47

Noting that I received the following response to the revocation message:

None of my comments were in the slightest vehement, instead, they were firmly logical.

Sent back:

None of my comments were in the slightest vehement, instead, they were firmly logical.

Per the SCP wiki site rules: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/site-rules#toc1

Comments: You can comment almost anywhere on the site, as long as you are respectful to other users. All comments must follow the Criticism Policy. Do not troll or make personal attacks.

Can you explain how the comments you posted, specifically "You have no room to be a critic, when you yourself do absolutely NOTHING." and "I honestly don't think you should be talking. Tell me, which original SCP articles have you written?" are not personal attacks?

Re: Disciplinary - Dr Calasanti

Zyn 08 Oct 2025 07:05

User responded:

My comments were purely logic based, telling the opposition that they had no room to critisize, as they most likely did not know how hard creating an original SCP idea was.

Given this response, staff is discussing a ban from the site. For now, the user's pending application to join has been declined.

Re: Disciplinary - Dr Calasanti

Zyn 09 Oct 2025 07:58

Given the above, staff have voted to issue the user a monthlong ban from the site.

afto, Ari, Zoobeeny, Queerious supporting ban.

Ban enacted, PM sent.

Re: Disciplinary - Dr Calasanti

Zyn 10 Oct 2025 06:03

Uh, "Staff Have Voted" it is literally only you "voting" due to you being so "hurt" at being wrong.

JK, I'll wait the month.

Sent back:

I will forward your message to staff for further discussion. Due to the perceived concern regarding unfair handling, I will recuse myself from any further votes regarding your case.

As I am now recusing myself, further communication with this user should be handled by another staff member.

Re: Disciplinary - Dr Calasanti

Kufat 10 Oct 2025 20:28

I don't see any benefit to unbanning this user after a month. Recommending perma based on their responding to a fully-justified ban with trolling/a personal attack.

Re: Disciplinary - Dr Calasanti

HarryBlank 14 Oct 2025 06:40

Permaban enacted by HarryBlank with AriadnesThread, Kufat and Queerious agreeing and Ari/Queerious witnessing the escalation. Zyn remained recused.

Last edited on 14 Oct 2025 06:41 by HarryBlank Show more