Non-Disc Record - Acid Mind

Summary:

doesn't get site, somewhat spammy, immature

Non-Disc Record - Acid Mind

Zyn 20 May 2016 18:08

New site member Acid Mind (account age 20 days, site membership 10 days) has recently demonstrated some concerning behavior:

Introducing self with a draft, later edited over: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1714488/i-wrote-my-first-scp#post-2511577

Question in General Advice, after I told them what to do with their draft: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1715331/new-scp#post-2512032

I've created a new scp, but what i do now?

A thread titled "Proccedure 110-Montauk", originally with the thread description "do dirty things to SCP-231 with 6 d-class personnel" before I locked it to redirect comments to the proper discussion page: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1715332/proccedure-110-montauk

You only have to see "Six Days" tale

They may be underage. Keep an eye on.

Re: Non-Disc Record - Acid Mind

MrWrong 21 May 2016 16:42

User posted an article and did not respond well to comments.

This is what the user responded to the "grammatical issues" of their article (as pointed out by another user, who just said "grammatical issues"): http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1715975/scp-2405#post-2512467

No there aren't any grammatical issues, i used the auto traducer of computers, the one that shows you a red line zig-zag, so stop your lies please, hater

I responded to the user like this: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1715975/scp-2405#post-2512469

I would like to note that online spellchecks may help you with spelling, but not all of grammar necessarily. Issues like subject-verb agreement are not covered by spellchecks.

And there is no need to be antagonistic to other users. It would be better to ask them to point out these grammatical errors if they insist that there is.

Last edited on 21 May 2016 16:59 by MrWrong Show more

Re: Non-Disc Record - Acid Mind

Zyn 21 May 2016 18:28

They also self-upvoted, messed up the image coding, didn't adhere to the basic article format, and tagged their article with just "euclid", "bacteria", and "pill".

Recommending revoke if they don't improve.

Edit: They got into an argument in their discussion thread, about their SCP being too similar to cancer:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1715975/scp-2405#post-2512539

I don't see what is wrong, i can't make a thing same as cancer?

Dude, it can make grow new organs and limbs, cancer doesn't grow you a third arm

(of note, the article itself only states, "expansion/growth of limbs/organs")

They even edited the article with a random text box:

No, it is not cancer, cancer doesn't make you grow a third arm or grow your head

Serious flailing here. Let's have that revoke.

Last edited on 21 May 2016 19:33 by Zyn Show more

Re: Non-Disc Record - Acid Mind

Zyn 21 May 2016 20:10

Also noting some serious creep with 231/Montauk, including posting actual "fanart" (it's not NSFW, but… really?) of it: http://www.scp-wiki.net/six-days/comments/show#post-2512347

Re: Non-Disc Record - Acid Mind

Zyn 21 May 2016 20:30

As of a recent trolling spree, they now have a thread in Disciplinary, here: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-1716123/disciplinary-acid-mind