Noting for records-keeping that it was recently reported to staff that new site member DrRene (account age 42 days, site membership 41 days) has been spamming the concepts critique forum:
From today:
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17119413/seeking-greenlights-kinda (did not use template) "Idea, Canvas of Creation. Can repaint reality, I don't know what that means quite yet, but I will figure it out. This something that people want to read?"
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17119413/seeking-greenlights-kinda#post-6978311 "I will refine it, but I want to if it is even good, and I know to use the template"
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17119413/seeking-greenlights-kinda#post-6978331 "If the concept has potential, and is it unique" (reply to reader comment "I can not judge your idea without knowing the story you are going to attach to it. A story can decide between a good and a bad idea, so what is the story here?"
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17119413/seeking-greenlights-kinda#post-6978336 "I haven't gotten there yet You know what, I'm going to do a different idea. Infinitely dense tungsten cube, I'll figure it out"
Of note, the entirety of their site history has involved breaking forum guidelines:
- 27 March https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17084220/the-infinity-men posted entire template in thread summary
- 28 March http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17084562/infinity-men repeat thread of above
- 31 March http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17084220/the-infinity-men#post-6906113 reply to staff post "Can you do something about it? Please"
- 23 April http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17100062/living-oil#post-6934306 "You have suggestions? I did my best. What would you write?" completely ignored the questions the reviewer asked
- 1 May https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass original post over maximum wordcount, user edited post to remove staff notice, wordcount still over max
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6963154 "To the person who is talking to me, let's use a new thread, other one is too crowded" (after user already had one thread locked as repeat)
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6972736 "I tried to keep it under 240 words, but the story needs all of the words to get my central narrative properly explained." (the wordcount max is 400 words; user had 640 words/240 over the limit)
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6963143 double-post, also asked a reviewer to look at a revision they had not actually saved/did not actually display
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976217 "I'll do something, I'll post, I'll get the concept of an SCP Greenlit, by posting something asking people if the general base concept of the SCP is good enough for community standards, and when the concept is Greenlit, I'll start writing the central narrative. Should I do that"
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976224 "Can I post my base concepts, as in, no story, just the original idea that I will base an SCP and art about, and I won't write a central narrative to make sure that it is an idea worth putting time into. That is what I am saying."
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976231 "I just want to see if it is an idea that people are willing to read about, even without the central air concept. What I am saying is. I want to post a Minor base idea of an SCP, no central narrative yet, just so I can make sure it is something the people, with high standards, are willing to read it, while wanting more. So I don't need to waste time on a concept that nobody wants. It is a thing so I know if people want more of a base Idea, less than this stuff here."
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976248 "I just want people to like what I make, And I don't want to waste time on something that not a single person would enjoy, as, it is hard to make something good."
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976301 asking for separate concept in same thread.
- https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976427 "I am trying my hardest to think of unique ideas, and this is one, I am glad I did this, so I know that I am trying to make something that is apparently to similar to another scp. I'll delete this forum. So until I post about my next idea, I'll be thinking as hard as I can."
It was also noticed that the user repeatedly ignores reviewer input, instead asking the reviewers to do the work for them or just refusing to take their advice:
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17100062/living-oil#post-6934306
You have suggestions? I did my best. What would you write?
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6962363
I often ask this, as you know, a feedback thing, what would you add. How would you word it, and how would you make this something you would want to read?
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6975353 (after being told "A. you could possibly remove redact most scps mentioned, that way readers can go "oh he's probably talking about [xxx]" without being really derivative and relying on other scips")
I'll tell you this, I don't know how you will interpret this, I tell you this without means of being rude or anything similar. I am a world builder, I like making lore points, and, I like to use sometimes not so relevant stuff to help the world feel like it is still happening in the background, so, I like to use all of the details, I know that you don't like it, but it is how I write. And you need a little filler in good writing
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976120
I'm not using 682. And when I write the draft I will go into more detail, as I can't right now, as I need more time to write the story. I'm trying my hardest to get something Greenlit, and this was my third attempt, and the one I will make sure gets Greenlit, no matter how long it takes. I just want to make an SCP man. And I will explain it much more when I properly write the story
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976181
To the people who will show up to review this, and the people already here:
I am writing a story I personally would want to read.
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17110034/seeking-greenlights:indestructible-glass#post-6976193 reply to reader comment "That's good, but your preferences aren't going to influence greenlighters. They give out their greenlights if they think it's an idea EVERYONE will want to read, not just that of the writer."
I am making something I would want to to read, as I feel it good enough, especially with the high standards of the wiki. And if I don't think it is quality enough, which is a personal thing, I don't think it would do well so I don't post anything about it.
Given all the above, I have revoked the user's membership. PM sent.