Noting that staff received a report regarding TF3RDL (account age 218 days):
| Hi, I just wanted to put forward a complaint about wiki user 'TF3RDL', essentially every comment I see from them is some overly aggressive accusation of AI use, not always on pages with hallmarks of gen ai. To be clear, I'm fully against the use of ai generated content on the wiki, I just think there's a difference between 'this has some AI tells' or 'author, did you use ai to create this' versus their 'this is slop I hate slop downvoted get off the wiki' sort of attitude. […] |
Some examples of comments in question were:
I see some semblance of AI Slop indicators (especially with the "conclusion" subheading) even after I've just skimmed through this page, so -1 despite not fully reading this
This page seems like AI Slop, so instant -1 and did you use generative AI to write this? Because I hate AI Slop in collaborative writing communities like SCP
Kufat, afto, Esperion, and Harry agreeing that the behavior was consistent and should be addressed. Kufat replied to a helpdesk comment from the user asking them to report suspected AI rather than insulting authors, citing the Critique Policy.
Two days ago, on 04/22/25, the user posted the following comment on another coldpost:
I think this is AI slop, -1
Kufat, afto, Harry, Queerious, and Ari supported membership revocation. nico enacted revoke; it is unclear whether a PM was sent or not.
As of now, the user has re-applied and rejoined the site.