Disciplinary - ClarenceWho

Summary:

Malicious downvoting

Disciplinary - ClarenceWho

HarryBlank 08 Aug 2024 07:51

User ClarenceWho (account age 505 days) admitted to maliciously downvoting an article, in a comment on its -CN translation, as an attack on the author.

https://scp-wiki-cn.wikidot.com/forum/t-16900029/daisydeathdysphoria#post-6589340

我本来还是中性态度的，看到牢鳟这b样不得不给原文dv了

Ban enacted by Zyn.

Last edited on 09 Aug 2024 07:23 by Zyn Show more

Re: Disciplinary - ClarenceWho

Zyn 09 Aug 2024 07:10

Received the following reply to the ban message:

Dear Zyn

I do not understand how downvoting ONE tale makes it malicious downvoting.

Quoting Uncle Nicolini, word by word: You're free to downvote it if you don't like it.

I didn't like it, so I downvoted it. Nothing more.

If you think I downvoted it because of the author, check SCP-6862, it's written by the same author and I upvoted it.

ClarenceWho

I will send a reply linking to this thread.

Re: Disciplinary - ClarenceWho

Zyn 10 Aug 2024 07:11

Received the following appeal(?):

Dear Zyn

Oh, now I see the problem. Yes, I suppose I should explain this.

The reason why I posted this is that I'm somewhat upset with the author's response to the whole thing. And this is me saying so. I meant it as something of a satirical comment but it appears that it came out completely wrong. And I apologize for that. It was a joke of bad taste in hindsight and that's on me so I am sorry.

The comment and me downvoting are two completely isolated events. I can see how you've come to connect them and I understand, but that's simply not the case.

ClarenceWho

Disciplinary team, please weigh in.