New site member AWexford (account age 4 days, site membership 3 days, recently posted the following to the Draft Critique thread without greenlights: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16865809/scp-draft-a-literal-dreamcatcher
Thread description, "Short Article about SCP-XXXX a Native American dreamcatcher that stores dreams during REM sleep, displaying them as intricate patterns within its webbing. It can selectively replay stored dreams to anyone who touches a specific string before sleep, revealing the dreams of previous users."
https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/a-literal-dreamcatcher
Wrd Ct:600
Seeking Feedback/Greenlights
This is a finished draft. i just would like some input on dialouge and maybe if i should add another log otherwise this is a completely finished work.
The linked draft has multiple common hallmarks of AI-generation:
Of note, the author's sandbox edits consist entirely of formatting changes, renaming the page, adding small portions to the test log bit by bit (with simple errors like using "personnel" as singular and not correctly capitalizing "Foundation", and correcting their own added errors. In revision 20, they add "penis" to a footnote.
The author's other forum posts also don't match the writing style of the draft (note the abundance of simple errors):
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16865809/scp-draft-a-literal-dreamcatcher#post-6545314
I got critique in the official discord server, i believe one was in dms and I dont know about the the other. But i'll post it here to be safe
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16865964/sg-a-literal-dreamcatcher#post-6545331 (Ideas Critique thread without template)
Hello, to anyone reading this. This will be short since the titles pretty much tell-all, but its exactly what it sounds like, and says in the summary, a literal dreamcatcher that can catch and hold the dreams of anyone who uses it. pretty simple concept
I've posted in the draft thread asking if they used AI.
