AI Record - reds3232

Summary:

Posted AI article with "GPT" in text

Disciplinary - reds3232

Zoobeeny 02 May 2024 19:45

It was brought to staff attention that reds3232 (account age 1297 days, site membership 4 days) posted the article: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-8096, which contained multiple indicators of AI-generation.

+ show block

This addendum details the establishment and success of the Interspecies Health and Safety Initiative as a model for collaborative health management between the SCP Foundation and anomalous entities, showcasing a proactive and mutually beneficial approach to public health in containment settings.

Handling of SCP-8091 is strictly prohibited unless personnel are wearing protective gloves. Direct physical contact with SCP-8091 without these gloves is forbidden to prevent accidental interaction with the internal environment.

Conclusion:
Integrating SCP-914 into the technological development process of SCP-8091 has opened new avenues for advancing and refining technology within anomalous environments. This approach not only enhances the operational capabilities of SCP-8091 but also deepens our understanding of the interaction between different SCPs. Future initiatives will focus on further refining the integration process and expanding the scope of technology enhancement to include more complex systems, always adhering to rigorous safety and ethical standards to ensure that advancements are both sustainable and beneficial.

Page source is saved and is available to staff.

Disc Team, please weigh in.

Last edited on 03 May 2024 06:55 by Zyn Show more

Re: Disciplinary - reds3232

Zyn 03 May 2024 07:04

Noting that the user self-deleted the article in question, and they have a sandbox: https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/collab:drlavalava-and-reds3232 which, per report, "revision 0 of this has the word "GPT" appropos of nothing sitting in the middle of the page".

Furthermore, it was noticed:

• "looking at reds sandbox history, their entire article was basically written immediately and has minimal edit history"
• "Just one instance of the weird conclusion with arbitrary adjectives and adverbs is typically a smoking gun. This one article has no less than 25 instances of those. Not to mention the sandbox history plainly stating that the entire article was written in one sitting and the other sandbox just having "GPT" just slapped right in the middle of it."
• "Drlavalava saying [in the discussion thread]: "I have witnessed his writing process with my of eyes and saw him perform revisions according to my feedback." is incredibly suspicious simply because of the fact the entire article did not change from Revision 0."
• "Just to be extra, super duper sure, I also plugged the posted article and the final sandbox revision into a text compare. The only differences between posted and final sandbox is that the sandbox uses SCP-8091 while the posted used SCP-8096."
• "The only differences between Final Sandbox and Initial Sandbox is a reformatting of the collapsible titles. Which means that the only difference between the Posted Article and the Initial Sandbox is the SCP designation and the titles of the collapsibles, which means that Drlavalava can only be lying."

The reds3232 account has been revoked, pending a ban. PM sent and thread moved to Disc.

Disc team, please weigh in with regards to ban. Personally I am recommending a month for both users involved.