Do we add the following to the rules:
The use of generative1 machine learning2 models to generate user facing content3 is banned.
Furthermore, the usage of tools whose primary use is generative machine learning is also banned for user facing content.
All exceptions to this policy are on the following white list:
- (This list is currently empty)
Examples of banned content include but are not limited to
- ChatGPT generated text
- Midjourney/Stable diffusion
- AI voice generation
Examples of allowed content
- Grammarly, DeepL translator
- Fractal generation
- Traditional text to speech (if license compatible)
- AI generated CSS code
- Writing stories about AIs
This will replace the previous rules on AI content (see https://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-15827344/discussion-ai-generated-text-on-the-wiki and https://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-15272525/discussion-minor-change-to-art-page-rules).
Furthermore:
- Should we grandfather in all previous cases of AI generated content (there were some we missed last time)?
- Should we whitelist the use of AI based captioning for automatically generating?
Finally, do we extend purview of teams in the following ways:
- The Tech team can approve generative machine learning tools for technical uses and can ban non generative machine learning tools.
- The Licencing team can ban any machine learning tool on licencing grounds. This will override a Tech team approval.
Voting block:
|| ||~ Yes ||~ No ||
||Approve the new rule || X || X ||
||Grandfather clause || X || X ||
||Whitelist generative AI for automatic alt text generation || X || X ||
||Expansion of purview || X || X ||
This vote will go on for one week