04 mirror: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16381268/discussion-tale-tagging
For the last few years there has been a project by the Collections subteam to create tale tags. This project has stalled for the last year or so due to widespread burnout. However, they were able to create this list of proposed tags: https://05command.wikidot.com/sandbox:tale-tags
This list is missing some definitions, which I will crowdsource in this thread/related discord discussion.
Tag creation
Now as only a subsection of tales on the site have been read by Collections the list in incomplete and may over estimate the size of certain tags. As these tags cast a very broad net they should require a significant amount of articles to justify their existence. Thus I propose a minimum 25 article requirement for additional theme and genre tags.
In addition, after one year of implementing these tags, any tag with less than 25 uses will be dropped.
Tag implementation
Implementing this will require a frankly enormous amount of work, given the 5000 tales on this site. As such I propose doing this to be partially left up to the community.
Under this proposal the following users will be allowed to tag tales:
Staff
Former staff in good standing
Any user with one successful page on the site
Any user who has had an idea greenlit
Any user who has passed a crit flight
Any user a member of staff (including JS) deems capable of doing so
These permissions are broad to allow for as many users to aid this endeavor while still requiring that the user be integrated enough into the site to understand it.
Any disputes on this should be brought up to the Tagging Team who have final say on what genre tags an article should have.
And one other thing
There are two tags not on this list that I want to bring up specifically as options.
Firstly LGBT: we have a lot of queer fiction on the site, however a tag may invite bigots to target and downvote LGBT fiction
Secondly _genreless, a hidden tag for if an article does not have any genre or theme tags to keep track of what articles have been looked at and what don’t fit into any of our boxes.