Non-Disc Record here: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-15662899/non-disc-record-murph3y
Noting that Murph3y does not match any existing user name has a history of responding poorly to negative feedback, including accusing reviewers of not reading their material closely enough and therefore choosing to effectively disregard it:
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-15643917/scp-xxx-danger-noodles-do-not-eat#post-5977575
[…] though,
I believe you are not giving this enough consideration for me to really consider your critique. I thought the whole principle of this foundation is to have narratives about containing anomalous entities.
not to mention your response was more subjective than actual helpful objective advice. Im just going to wait and hope the next reviewer takes more time to appreciate what im trying to create.
thanks
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-15643917/scp-xxx-danger-noodles-do-not-eat#post-5978478
please critique my concept instead of my critique of your critique.
In their most recent thread, they posted a 3400+ word response to reviewer questions, and when the excessive length of the post was mentioned, posted:
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-15648396/your-horrifying-best-friend#post-5985358
[…] Ps: Zoobs is way off. This is 660 words at 3962 characters ;P
And in reply to the subsequent reviewer response: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-15648396/your-horrifying-best-friend#post-5985463
Alright. After this critics response i will no longer be summoning them for their feedback. Instead, for everyone else who has read through their carefully constructed critique, to which i am wholly thankful for, i will now go into great detail on how completely wrong this critic was about my scp.
[…] So at this point, im not even sure if this critic has read my post entirely. Ive fully detailed out a conclusion. While not in its final form, i have plenty of ways i can think of to try to make the ending i have planned cannon with foundation lore.
[…] This is just uncalled for. This is the conceptual phases of an scp that is a work in progress. skimming the surface of the potential for this scp is exactly what these phases are for. Writers look towards critics to provide insight on successful scp articles so they can model their writing better. I have absolutely no good reason, from a writers perspective, to even address a critique like this.
[…] I think if if this critic spent more time considering this scp, and reading what i have been working on, they would understand how i fulfill everything they've listed out thus far!
Thank you again zoobeeny for all of your extensive critiques. I appreciate all the time you have spent on them, despite how wrong i think you are. :)
Given that staff have addressed the same behavior before, and the multiple complaints staff have received regarding this user, their membership has been revoked.