So, Dr Korst started out being pretty receptive to crit, as seen here: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14414850/seeking-greenlights-medusa-s-head
I tried pretty patiently to explain that SCPs usually survive on their story, instead of just describing the object. For people that don't feel like skimming the thread, this took a while.
After that, they started shotgunning ideas and immediately abandoning them once they had received the first crit post on it.
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14459224/seeking-greenlights-god-bless-them
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14459629/seeking-greenlights-duck-cakes
Then it kind of started going off-rails with them making a greenlight post on a thread (which was locked, due to the limit on ideas that can be posted in a week): https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14460450/seeking-greenlights-the-centipede-in-the-center
Central Narrative: The entity is a centipede in the earths core. This scp is sleeping. if disturbed will eat up the earths core and cause massive freezing on the earth. It is covered in metal. It is a bad idea. ANYTHING YOU DO DONT LET THIS GO THROUGH. I. REPEAT. DO. NOT. READ THIS FURTHER.
SECRET: IT IS ACTUALLY NOT GONNA DESTROY THE EARTH. IT IS AWAKENED IF TOO MANY PEOPLE KNOW OF IT. FI AWAKE WILL AWAKEN THE THING IN THE HUMAN SUBCONCIOUS SO DONT LET THIS BE SEEN BY TOO MANY PEOPLE
ADDITIONAL STUFF: FINAL WARNING, STOP-READING….NOW
They did nothing rulebreaking to my knowledge, but with the amount of threads they create and them immediately ditching them after someone takes the time to review something is a common source of annoyance for reviewers, hence the thread here. The semi-roleplaying in the greenlight post isn't helping.