GusDaner

Summary:

Pity-partying, abuse of reviewers

GusDaner

MalyceGraves 15 May 2021 02:02

User has been around for a few weeks, tossed about some ideas, generally engaged with minimal issue. Then this happened in #thecritters.

+ Logs

[21:32:05] -> Joins: GusDaner (PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht)
[21:35:24] <GusDaner> How's everyone doing?
[21:35:55] <HatterTheMadd> Watching anime
[21:36:19] <COLE13> trying to get crit
[21:36:55] <ThatVultureBot17> Still waiting for someone who is interested in reviewing my idea for a tale.
[21:36:55] <GusDaner> COLE1 Same
[21:36:56] <DrJekill> Back Cole
[21:37:08] <COLE13> i have to turn the draft in on the 21st lmao
[21:37:08] <HatterTheMadd> I would, but I'm in the middle of too much right now. Unless you could wait a while
[21:37:23] <COLE13> DrJekill that was a quick bath lmao
[21:37:45] <DrJekill> Really?
[21:37:53] <DrJekill> I can bath faster
[21:38:00] <COLE13> ha
[21:38:03] <HatterTheMadd> 1h minimum
[21:38:13] <GusDaner> ThatVultureBot17 I can take a look if you want. I can't greenlight, but I'm willing to give you polite critique, which is literally normal critique.
[21:38:28] <COLE13> sometimes i fall asleep because i am bored gah
[21:38:34] <ThatVultureBot17> Alright then Gus, here is the link: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14069666/enrolling-in-site-17-s-hsdp
[21:38:38] <DrJekill> About the crit…
[21:39:08] <COLE13> oh- yeah!
[21:39:29] <DrJekill> XD you forgot!
[21:39:36] <COLE13> Well, I think some examples about what i am about to crit are
[21:40:09] <DrJekill> (suspense)
[21:40:12] <COLE13> when you tell in the beginning that
[21:40:36] <COLE13> the character is the 3rd wandsmen of aza,
[21:40:54] <DrJekill> Is the Sixth not third
[21:41:00] <COLE13> you should put that in the beginning, it feels better paced
[21:41:05] <COLE13> DrJekill shit sorry
[21:41:46] <DrJekill> I put that in the begining: "I'm the Sixth Wandsmen of Aza, I hope you enjoy
[21:42:19] <COLE13> alright, my second window closed out, so can you link the thing again? sorry
[21:42:30] <DrJekill> Ok
[21:42:36] <COLE13> thx
[21:42:42] <DrJekill> http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/dr-jekill
[21:42:53] <quicksilver> I have a 2600 word 6kon draft if anyone feels like critting
[21:43:16] <GusDaner> ThatVultureBot17 From what I can tell, which APPARENTLY I can't, this looks good. At the moment, I can't find anything wrong, well critiquing wise, with it.
[21:43:31] <ThatVultureBot17> Ok.
[21:43:47] <quicksilver> (The draft is about where baby anomalies come from, if that's a selling point)
[21:43:52] <COLE13> DrJekill by the beginning, i mean the very beginning. It just kind interrupts the flow
[21:44:03] <DrJekill> Ah, ok
[21:44:14] <GusDaner> ThatVultureBot17 It does definitely have an interesting concept to it.
[21:44:28] <GusDaner> That's all I gotta say.
[21:44:37] <DrJekill> You have to show me yours updated and finished!
[21:44:48] <ThatVultureBot17> Thanks for your critique, GusDaner.
[21:45:41] <GusDaner> I mean, I didn't give you any, but your welcome nonetheless.
[21:46:41] <GusDaner> I feel like I'm done here, honestly.
[21:47:03] <quicksilver> oh fairydoctor, might I solicit le critique?
[21:47:09] <DrJekill> No Gus! Believe in yourself!
[21:47:20] <GusDaner> Goodbye to anyone who cares, which they probably DON'T!
[21:47:27] <fairydoctor> quicksilver im up for a draft swap. have you seen the mannequin tale yet?
[21:47:33] <TheSpiderQueen> MalyceGraves:
[21:47:43] <quicksilver> fairydoctor, I have, but I'm down to reread
[21:47:50] <fairydoctor> cool
[21:47:54] <quicksilver> is it different from before?
[21:47:58] <DrJekill> Don't say goodbye!!!
[21:48:04] <fairydoctor> did you read the tale or the article? <- quicksilver
[21:48:15] <quicksilver> fairydoctor I thought there was just an article
[21:48:18] <fairydoctor> lol
[21:48:24] <GusDaner> DrJekill Sorry I gotta leave. I feel incredibly insulted.
[21:48:38] <DrJekill> Why?
[21:48:48] <TheSpiderQueen> GusDaner: Knock off the pity partying
[21:48:52] <GusDaner> Besides, I've got better things to do
[21:49:07] <DrJekill> I feel your pain.
[21:49:10] <fairydoctor> im working on an article and a tale in tandem. want to post the tale soon. id be working on the article more too but 6k con. and im better at tales anyway
[21:49:13] <fairydoctor> quicksilver
[21:49:22] <quicksilver> http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/6kon-quickestsilver fairydoctor, working title is "And Who Will Forgive Us When He's Gone"
[21:49:38] <fairydoctor> ok
[21:49:40] <quicksilver> fairydoctor I'll read anything about the mannequin, it's 50 shades of fucked up in the best way
[21:49:45] <quicksilver> link?
[21:50:20] <fairydoctor> quicksilver http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14099856/mannequin:a-tale#post-4978553 please leave crit on the thread, im getting into the final phases of thing
[21:50:38] <quicksilver> can do fairydoctor- dm me or just yell at me here, dealer's choice
[21:51:31] <fairydoctor> ok
[21:51:53] <GusDaner> %TheSpiderQueen Leave me alone. I didn't even do anything mean to you, I don't understand why you've got to lay your own insecurities on me like I deserved that. And don't bother trying to respond to me. Because I'm gone.
[21:51:54] -> Parts: GusDaner (PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht) (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

User has been banned from the chat for 1 year, but has been permanently banned from #thecritters.

The may appeal both decisions separately.

Re: GusDaner

stormfallen 15 May 2021 02:50

Posting logs from slightly earlier in #thecritters which are relevant:

+ Open

[20:32:32] <GusDaner> %DrFullham Hello! If you want to check out my concept/idea, you can. I just finished updating it so it might explain more about the creature. http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-14066197/scp-xxxx-demo#post-4958348
[20:32:50] <DrFullham> DrJekill: Read a few articles, but other than that, no
[20:33:54] <DrJekill> You could take a look at my sandbox? (it's already greenlighted)
[20:34:07] <DrFullham> Not doing draft crit right now, sorry
[20:34:22] <GusDaner> %DrFullham That's fine.
[20:34:28] <DrJekill> Ok…
[20:34:39] <DrFullham> I was talking to Jekill, I'm checking your thread right now Gus
[20:35:02] <GusDaner> Oh, sorry. I thought you were talking to me.
[20:36:09] <DrJekill> Do you know anyone that is willing to make a draft crit about them?
[20:36:26] <DrFullham> I do not monitor the crit states of other users.
[20:36:43] <DrJekill> I was not saying that.
[20:36:55] <DrJekill> Don't be mad
[20:37:03] <Mooagain> DrFullham you should try it out, it's fun and definitely not creepy
[20:37:30] <DrJekill> Monitor the crit states?
[20:37:37] <DrFullham> I'm not mad, just saying I don't know whether or not anyone else would be available for that right now.
[20:37:59] <DrJekill> That's fine, thanks anyway :)
[20:42:39] <TheSpiderQueen> GusDaner: Your concept is 331 words over the 400 word limit
[20:43:54] <GusDaner> Most reviewers said that the word limit didn't matter.
[20:45:15] <TheSpiderQueen> GusDaner: As someone on the forum critique staff team, you need to fix that
[20:45:41] <GusDaner> Oh, that's going to be VERY difficult.
[20:45:53] <GusDaner> But I suppose I'll try.
[20:48:12] <GusDaner> But I'm serious when I say that there's not much I can do to get the extra 331 words off.
[20:50:06] <GusDaner> %DrFullham Have you finished reading mine yet? And I'm aware it's over the amount of words I can use.
[20:50:28] <DrFullham> I'm typing a response right now
[20:50:57] <GusDaner> Okay, I appreciate it either way.
[20:51:46] <GusDaner> %DrFullham Thank you!
[20:53:19] <TheSpiderQueen> GusDaner: Look, I'm going to be honest. This idea is so all over the place it is very hard to follow. There are way too many moving parts and a lot of bloat that make it very spread thin. Furthermore, your hook isn't a hook, it's a whole continuation of your previous paragraph.
[20:59:47] <GusDaner> %TheSpiderQueenb I mean, it would be much easier if I could move to the draft phase so I can actually congregate my idea properly without being constrained to only 400 words.
[21:00:06] <DrJekill> Do you know anything about the Wandsmen Gol? COLE13
[21:00:11] <GusDaner> *%TheSpiderQueen
[21:00:15] <TheSpiderQueen> No, I suggest just dropping this idea all together
[21:01:01] <GusDaner> %TheSpiderQueen I feel like I'm too far into it to quit now.
[21:01:35] <TheSpiderQueen> GusDaner: Sunk Cost Fallacy?
[21:02:34] <TheSpiderQueen> I get it, but this doesn't work with the amount it's trying to do and the basis it was built on.
[21:03:59] <GusDaner> %TheSpiderQueen Absolutely not! And this is my first writing something like this, so I'm OBVIOUSLY not going to master it immediately.
[21:04:25] <TheSpiderQueen> GusDaner: I'm done here, don't ask me to critique anything else of yours
[21:06:04] *** Quits: GusDaner (PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht) (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

Re: GusDaner

weizhong 15 May 2021 03:06

User appealed. Their chat ban was commuted to one month, but we did not consider them as having appealed for #thecritters. Told them to take some time to evaluate their behavior and learn to take critique in a more positive way. They can appeal for #thecritters at a later date.

Loggity

• GusDaner (PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<Kufat> GusDaner, are you here to appeal your ban?
<MalyceGraves> GusDaner: You have been banned from the chat for 1 year and permanently from #thecritters. You may appeal either ban together or separately.
<MalyceGraves> http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-14100553/gusdaner You may read about your ban here
<MalyceGraves> Banned users are not to hang about in #site17, so if you are not here to appeal, I must ask you to leave

• DrFreeham is now known as DrFullham

<GusDaner> I'm here to appeal then
<MalyceGraves> One moment.

• Guest28441 (PI.42.851.049.bvd-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.42.851.049.bvd-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined
• Calibri_Bold (noitcudortni.on.sdeen.tseug.txen.ym|643693diu#noitcudortni.on.sdeen.tseug.txen.ym|643693diu) has joined

<Guest28441> Hey, how are you able to get you're draft criticized.

• Chortles has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)
• Chortles (PI.86.402.6l1.eev-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.86.402.6l1.eev-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<weizhong> GusDaner: Hello
<GusDaner> Hello
<weizhong> I'm here to take your appeal. Which one would you like to appeal?
<weizhong> You can start whenever you like. Let me know when you're finished!
<behindthePines> Hi guys, the sandbox join button is currently missing so I followed the instructions here. Could I be added to the invite list when there's an opportunity? Wikidot username is behindthePines. Thanks alot!
<stormfallen> behindthePines: we'll also need your age to add you

• theycallmetim (PI.57.89.d1v.078-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.57.89.d1v.078-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined
• Guest28441 has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)
• DrJekill has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

<GusDaner> %weizhong The most recent one, about pity-partying and abuse of reviewers.
<weizhong> Sure. To clarify, you can appeal the one year chat ban, which will let you back into #site19.
<weizhong> But you will need a separate appeal from #thecritters for the permanent ban.
<weizhong> /you can do that right now too.

• JamesBonie36 (moc.murtceps.ser.i647rp-PCS|egnuoleht#moc.murtceps.ser.i647rp-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<GusDaner> I was never banned from #19. I only got banned on #thecritters.
<MalyceGraves> To be clear, you have been banned from both
<MalyceGraves> I implemented the ban.

• Kiiki (ten.tsacmoc.xt.5f6v0b-PCS|egnuoleht#ten.tsacmoc.xt.5f6v0b-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<GusDaner> Ok then.
<weizhong> Yes, what Mal said.
<weizhong> Also, you are welcome to take a day or two to appeal your ban, if you'd like time to think about it.
<GusDaner> Sorry, I'm just very overwhelmed right now.
<weizhong> I understand. Take your time. As I said, if you'd like to wait until tomorrow or the day after to make your appeal, you are welcome to do so.
<GusDaner> Quick question. Is pity-partying something you're not allowed to do? I checked the rules and it didn't say anything about that.
<GusDaner> I would assume it is, as I got banned for it, so nvm.
<weizhong> We don't explicitly list pity-partying in the rules, but it falls under the category of being disruptive.

• behindthePines has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

<GusDaner> Okay, but I feel like someone wasn't treating me properly.
<GusDaner> I checked the rules and it said don't be a dick and someone was definitely doing just that.
<GusDaner> To me.
<weizhong> I understand that you felt that way, but lashing out at said user directly is inappropriate. If you have a problem with another user, you are welcome to bring it to the attention of the operators.
<GusDaner> Am I allowed to say specific names? Like usernames no matter how high up they are?

• taylor_itkin (klaw.tceps.er|637242diu#klaw.tceps.er|637242diu) has joined
• ChanServ gives channel operator status to taylor_itkin
• Kiiki5 (ten.tsacmoc.xt.5f6v0b-PCS|egnuoleht#ten.tsacmoc.xt.5f6v0b-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined
• BoogeyMobile23 (yegoob.eht.no.ti.emalb|728152diu#yegoob.eht.no.ti.emalb|728152diu) has joined

<weizhong> You are allowed to mention names.

• theycallmetim has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

<GusDaner> Okay good.

• theycallmetim (PI.57.89.d1v.078-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.57.89.d1v.078-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<JamesBonie36> Hey, how long does it usually take to get the registration in you Email ?
<Kufat> JamesBonie36, for Wikidot or for IRC?
<JamesBonie36> IRC
<Kufat> JamesBonie36, within a minute. Check promotions, spam, other folders, etc.
<JamesBonie36> Sorry, don't see it still. Did I do something wrong

• gee0765 has quit (Connection closed for inactivity)

<weizhong> GusDaner: Still there?
<GusDaner> This is my side of the story. I was talking about my idea, which is why I originally wanted to come here, to ask how I could lock my thread so I can rewrite it. I was receiving critique about it when TheSpiderQueen said that it was 331 words over the limit. That was going to be hard, because I had a lot of mixed comments on how I could improve it.
<GusDaner> I tell them that it is going to be hard, but I will try. They then say something like my idea wasn't the fleshed out or it was too flat. Then I said that I was trying my best, and it was my first time doing this. Then they make a somewhat rude comment along the lines of and I quote "sunk cost fallacy?". I then reply saying that again this was my
<GusDaner> first time doing this, but, literally out the blue, they say something along the lines of "
<Kufat> Jazstar, I've sent an email to the address you lsited at registration

• JamesBonie36 has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)
• DrJekill (PI.251.602.bv8.f4m-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.251.602.bv8.f4m-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<GusDaner> I'm done here. I don't want to ever look at your concepts again." Which left me pretty hurt, because I thought that this was one of the few places where people won't yell at each other back and forth.

• Kiiki has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)
• Kiiki5 has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

<Kufat> .tell JamesBonie36 The email address you used at registration was not valid. I've dropped your nick so you can try again.
<Secretary_Helen> Kufat: *Jots that down on her clipboard* Got it, I'll let them know…
<weizhong> GusDaner: Are you finished? No worries either way, I'd just like to know when you've concluded your appeal.
<GusDaner> Not yet.

• DrJekill has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)
• JamesBonie36 (moc.murtceps.ser.i647rp-PCS|egnuoleht#moc.murtceps.ser.i647rp-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<weizhong> Sure. Let me know when you've finished.

• TSDTom (ten.tsacmoc.aw.degel1-PCS|egnuoleht#ten.tsacmoc.aw.degel1-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined
• JamesBonie36 has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)
• JamesBonie36 (moc.murtceps.ser.i647rp-PCS|egnuoleht#moc.murtceps.ser.i647rp-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<JamesBonie36> Hey, I checked every part of my Email. Yet, nothing.
<Kufat> JamesBonie36, you typed an invalid address
<Kufat> I emailed it manually and it bounced
<Kufat> try again
<JamesBonie36> Okay. Thaks
<Kufat> You're welcome

• TSDTom has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

<GusDaner> Then, I leave, as I was both baffled, and speechless, and quite hurt. I rejoined and leave again a couple times, which might not all be that smart. And that leads me to where I was banned, although I was pity-partying, which I'm greatly sorry about doing. Actually, I'm greatly sorry about all this, and I didn't mean to cause any trouble. I will
<GusDaner> definitely take a break from this so I can insure that this won't happen again, which it won't, because I'm not like that. But again, although I was pity-partying, they did make another rude remark which was true. But at that moment, I felt pretty attacked, and done something that I shouldn't have, and lashed out at them. I just didn't think which
<GusDaner> I should have done, which ultimately leaded to my ban.
<GusDaner> I'm finished by the way, that's honestly all I've got.

• EstrellaYoshte (moc.murtceps.ser.r2cnoq-PCS|egnuoleht#moc.murtceps.ser.r2cnoq-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined
• Guest76216 (PI.07.252.kck.e1t-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.07.252.kck.e1t-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined
• Guest76216 has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)
• Explanation2die (PI.07.252.kck.e1t-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.07.252.kck.e1t-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<JamesBonie36> So where do I put the registration command ?
<Kufat> JamesBonie36, that's covered in the chat guide

• Reecepedia (ten.labolgcbs.cslvng.q4olj5-PCS|egnuoleht#ten.labolgcbs.cslvng.q4olj5-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<weizhong> GusDaner: Okay, here are my thoughts.
<weizhong> I understand that you felt attacked by the critique that you received from the individual in question, but please recall that critters here are volunteers, and are not obligated to give you their time or to sugarcoat their critique so long as it does not personally attack you.
<GusDaner> I know.
<weizhong> Regardless of whether or not it was personal, this does not give you the right to respond in the way that you did, especially given that the pity-partying in question came off as manipulative.

• theycallmetim has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

<GusDaner> I understand.

• JamesBonie36 has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

<weizhong> I am willing to commute your chat ban to a one month ban instead of a year long ban, in light of this being your first offense, but I want to stress that if you have issues in the future, please direct them to an operator in a private message, and do not take it out publicly.
<GusDaner> I will.

• TarotWarden (moc.rr.ser.bqun2r-PCS|egnuoleht#moc.rr.ser.bqun2r-PCS|egnuoleht) has joined

<GusDaner> As in I will contact an operator and not out loud publicly.
<weizhong> As for your critters ban, I do not believe that you have provided sufficient justification for why you should be allowed to seek further critique there, but I also don't think you have fully made your appeal. You are welcome to make a full appeal from #thecritters at a later date, but I want to stress that you should prove why you should be allowed back in before attempting the appeal.
<GusDaner> Ok
<GusDaner> I understand.
<weizhong> So to summarize, your one year ban from regular chat is being commuted to one month, and you are allowed to make a new appeal for #thecritters at a later date, but as is, you are still banned from that channel.
<weizhong> If your appeal fails then you are welcome to appeal a year after that.

• EstrellaYoshte has quit (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

<weizhong> You are, of course, still welcome to use the site and forums for critique.
<weizhong> Any last questions?
<GusDaner> Ok, but I think I'm going to take a break from SCP as a whole. I think I just need some time off for myself, to properly get my barring's straight.
<weizhong> That might be for the best. Good luck with everything.
<weizhong> If there's nothing else, I'll ask you to leave the channel.
<GusDaner> Ok. Well, thank you very much.

• GusDaner (PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht#PI.42.91.hoc.573-PCS|egnuoleht) has left (The Lounge - By https://thelounge.chat)

Last edited on 15 May 2021 03:06 by weizhong Show more

Re: GusDaner

stormfallen 05 Jun 2021 00:09

Appeal for #thecritters ban, heard and denied by Corvus.

+ Open

2021-06-04 19:15:38 MalyceGraves: GusDaner: I found someone to take your appeal
2021-06-04 19:15:53 MalyceGraves: You may give it here
2021-06-04 19:16:33 GusDaner: Ok. Give me a moment.
2021-06-04 19:17:57 Corvus: Take your time.
2021-06-04 19:18:10 GusDaner: @MalyceGraves Actually, I would appreciate if the said someone and I would chat privately about this, if you don't mind.
2021-06-04 19:18:35 MalyceGraves: Thats not my call now
2021-06-04 19:18:36 Corvus: No. It will be done in here.
2021-06-04 19:18:48 GusDaner: Ok. That's fine.
2021-06-04 19:24:47 Corvus: If you're not ready to do your appeal you may come back at a later date.
2021-06-04 19:25:18 GusDaner: Nono, I'm still working on it.
2021-06-04 19:26:03 Corvus: Then please hurry up or leave and return when you're finished.
2021-06-04 19:26:29 GusDaner: For my appeal, I would like to start out by saying that I had ZERO intentions to do what my ban said I did. As in, I didn't purposely want to cause any problems. Yes, I can't hide that I was impatient and was keen to show people my good ideas.
2021-06-04 19:28:33 Corvus: Which isn't what you were primarily banned for
2021-06-04 19:28:52 Corvus: You were banned for flagrantly being an ass to reviewers.
2021-06-04 19:31:22 GusDaner: I still had more thoughts, but I felt very rushed after you told me to hurry it up.
2021-06-04 19:31:58 Corvus: You can continue but there is no reason it should take you this long
2021-06-04 19:32:18 Corvus: But appealing for stuff you weren't disciplined for necessarily isn't going to help you
2021-06-04 19:32:18 GusDaner: And I would appreciate it very much if I had time to write it all out.
2021-06-04 19:32:54 Corvus: You have ten minutes. I've shit to do and there is no reason it needs to take half that long.
2021-06-04 19:37:12 GusDaner: Thanks. Anyways, I know what I was banned for, and I do recall that I was banned because someone had been rude to me, and, I must admit, I wrongly lashed out at them. I don't recall being rude to anyone else. I might have been inconsiderate, but I never rudely talked back to any other reviewer.
2021-06-04 19:37:41 Corvus: They weren't rude to you.
2021-06-04 19:37:57 Corvus: And if you feel receiving valid criticism is "rudeness" there is no purpose served by allowing you back in.
2021-06-04 19:40:58 GusDaner: No, I didn't say that. They had specifically made comments talking about me being a lost cause. It wasn't critique, they actually made fun of me and my idea. This did happen too. On the same day I was banned, but it took place earlier. And I want to make it very clear. I'm fine with valid criticism.
2021-06-04 19:42:11 Corvus: I've looked at the logs in their entirety.
2021-06-04 19:42:13 GusDaner: They were not giving me valid criticism. They were giving "invalid" criticism.
2021-06-04 19:42:16 Corvus: That didn't happen.
2021-06-04 19:42:45 Corvus: You're clearly not able to respond to critique as we expect users of that channel to and continue to blame it on another user.
2021-06-04 19:42:48 Corvus: Appeal denied.
2021-06-04 19:43:10 GusDaner: You didn't even give me a chance to explain.
2021-06-04 19:43:29 GusDaner: GusDaner was kicked by Corvus for: You will be allowed back in 19 when your ban there is over.

Re: GusDaner

Zyn 05 Jun 2021 04:54

It doesn't sit well with me that the user kept trying to shift blame. Their initial reviewer was patient enough to give feedback even though the user knowingly failed to follow the forum guidelines (their post was almost double the max wordcount).