User MultiPerson3141 edited ProcyonLotor's sandbox. The edit was at the bottom of the last tab, and went as follows:
You don't mess with me, understand? SCP-1772 is MINE. Don't take my credit, raccoon.
Incidentally, SCP-1772 is "Egg" Allergy, by Drewbear. There's context as the two had interacted earlier today in site19, though I'm not sure if logs were relevant.
1772 was never mentioned, no. I'm just as baffled to the actual content as you are.
I (along with most people active in 19) gave him negative crit to his draft, and cut off because he was refusing to listen. When he continued to push me to give crit to him, I explained why I did not continue, and then he ragequit. And then this.
Anyway, this is intentional (if hilariously petty) vandalism, so we should probably ban from the sandbox.
Vandalism is a shitty thing to do, and it's even worse when it's over petty shit like this.
I vote for an additional seven day wiki ban just to indicate that we take a hard line with this kind of thing.
Ban from the sandbox and I'm willing to back Waxxs proposal, though I know there is no rule in place to do so.
I think I do too, if for no reason other than the fact that I'm tired of hearing about users shitting all over our sites.
It's overstepping protocol, but based on this user's activity in chat and now this, I also support a weeklong.
Wasn't PixelGames banned from the main site for sandbox vandalism as well? In this case, Pixel targeted two sandboxes to start, though MultiPerson targeted the sandbox of an OP who he had contact with today, so I dunno. Just leaving this here for someone to correct me if I'm wrong, since it looks like there's been previous precedence.
Just to clarify, none of my interaction with him today was in an operative capacity.
Sandbox ban implemented. Someone please send a PM, I need to deal with a spider problem at my house.
Also of note, they seem to be triggering some various potential-issue-user wires, with some of their recent posts:
On Mann's entry for the short SCPs contest: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2158/comments/show#post-2374165
Wha- is there something I'm missing?
This SCP has, like, one paragraph, and yet still remains. How long has this SCP been on this site?
I get 8 hours, and mine is already on the verge of immediate deletion. Not that I'm surprised, but still…
Really?
On a coldpost currently rated -26: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1359651/scp-694#post-2374247
Why does this have such a low rating? It looks good to me.
On SCP-732/fan-fic plague: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-95067/scp-732#post-2374248
Um… I'm not sure what the concept is, but I like it!
On SCP-1004/Factory Porn: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-411240/scp-1004#post-2374358
Wooooow.
This is just…
I like this.
Not sure why, but I do.
PM'd. Message is as follows.
MultiPerson3141,
This message is to inform you that you have been banned from the SCP Foundation Wiki Sandbox II site. The reason for this ban is: Vandalism of another user's page. This ban is to be considered indefinite.
For more information pertaining to your ban, please see the following link: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-1362086/multiperson3141
If you have any other questions, please feel free to PM either myself or another member of the staff Disciplinary Committee.
Best regards,
djkaktus
Moderator, SCP Foundation Wiki
Disciplinary Committee Captain
User responded to my PM. Guess what he had to say?
Okay, I just looked at the page, but I don't remember doing any of this.
If I'm correct, there was an edit under my username? On who's page?
I responded as such.
The history is available for viewing at the bottom of the page.
And then, remembering that he won't be able to view the history because he's banned,
As it is possible that you cannot view the page's history due to your ban, I am including the relevant screenshots in this message.
In the future, it is inadvisable that you lie to a member of the Disciplinary Committee.
Best Regards,
djkaktus
Moderator, SCP Foundation Wiki
Disciplinary Committee Captain
GUESS WHO.
I'm going to be straight up with you, I have a few things to say.
One, I honestly don't care about getting rid of the ban if it's temporary. I am worried about what is going on.
Two, I never "ragequit" when I was in chat, I disconnected from the internet for some reason. Everything else he said is true, though…
Three, I honestly have no idea how that comment got there. I never typed it, and all the images, screenshots, and files say otherwise. All I know is that I disconnected from the internet while I was in chat, and by the time I was online again, I got a message saying I was banned. For something that- I honestly don't care if you disbelieve me- I didn't type.
I don't care about the ban, can you just please help me figure out what is going on?
So I responded:
You are responsible for the behaviour of your account. The vandalism on the sandbox site was perpetrated by your account. Your sandbox ban should be considered permanent.
Your continued unwillingness to be honest is not going to help you here. Sandbox edits don't just "appear". We will consider this an escalation of your previous behaviour.
Best Regards,
djkaktus
Moderator, SCP Foundation Wiki
Disciplinary Committee Captain
Perma? He hasn't been honest once since this thing started. Kind of get the feeling he's just dicking around now.
I've had a couple of messages back and forth with him since then, nothing of real consequence. Can provide logs if need be. Basically, he maintains he has no idea how that comment was left there and is flabbergasted that we'd call him a liar.
And so on and so on.
