Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Summary:

Repeatedly misleading feedback

Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Zyn 19 Jul 2019 07:25

Aphrodia does not match any existing user name (account age and site membership 1 day) has been posting a lot of misleading or otherwise problematic feedback in the forums, necessitating staff intervention:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12238356/new-scp-idea-ryukyuan-lady#post-4309571

She's likely waifu material and this is an excellent concept. I can clearly see a funny interaction from the Foundation securing team like it first killed the male troops, then the females. Then a normal nonhuman costume approach failed. Maybe a semi human SCP finally brought her in. Possibly Dr Bright was an exception and he convinces people that she is a Japanese female who likes cats and Wolverine and wants to say hello.

If I was a SCP Wiki team member, I would greenlight this.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12238970/face-stealing-mud#post-4309655

Doctor Who did something similar. But I feel like this has been done, but I'm not sure. This may need clarification, like containment, backstory, and what if scenarios. It might turn out good.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12229349/alien-tail-syndrome#post-4309577

A symbiote. I had an idea of body parts like [REDACTED], [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] of females and parts of males like the [REDACTED PLEASE STOP TYPING THESE]. But a tail? Awesome!

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12238166/small-humanoid-creature-that-can-teleport-places-and-speak#post-4309467

Teleport to or teleport places elsewhere? A dwarf knome would look nice.

They also have some questionable concept posts, such as: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12239108/demidragon-symbiote-parts as well as a 7-concept shotgunning thread they made as their first forum thread on the site.

Given all the cleanup necessary, I've revoked their membership. PM has been sent.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Naepic 19 Jul 2019 15:24

Written with permission of taylor_itkin does not match any existing user name.

Listing other times user has posted questionable feedback:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12237610/soda-emporium

Any new soda types that gets to the market will appear to just come from the back room. Has even got discontinued brands and versions. It would be fun if it never runs out of stock and has a fair stock supply regardless of rarity or if binge bought.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12235819/dr-wondertainments-amatuer-paleontology-kit#post-4309576

A sandbox manifestation would be cool. Maybe that could be a naturally used occurance in Wondertainment kits?

Note that user also gave a greenlight when they were not qualified to in the same thread.

Maybe it's a function of the hat?

I greenlight this.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12238422/anthrax-dandruff-but-not-really-dandruff#post-4309510

Boiling water could dissolve the skin traveled through the droplets. A water heating malfunction would first make toxic white soup, then more dandruff creates white bubbles in the soup that pop like regular bubbles, but explodes with dandruff like a cloud of flour. If anyone asks, the soup tastes like clam chowder, which is almost white.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12238078/a-contagious-smile#post-4309470

A non lethall Joker gas? A bit of happy happy joy joy mixed with an idea based on a natural brain response. But the concept is similar to happy hypnotism yet original for the process and result. Maybe like the speech Groot has? Nice though.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Zyn 22 Jul 2019 05:52

Re-applied, accepted. Keep an eye on.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Zyn 02 Aug 2019 07:25

And they're back with problematic feedback, and sort of backseat modding?

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12268567/a-deadly-equation-first-only-scp#post-4320112

I'm not an experienced reviewer, but I'll talk.
I'm not sure, but is a draft a… Draft? There is a draft forum, as it's stated that a full draft is not allowed in this forum. You could try to put this in the other forum, but I don't recommended it since you already posted it here and will get critiqued on this. This forum is to develop ideas to then be made into a draft, as I made this mistake too in my first three SCP ideas.

I also request this to be in a sandbox (If the moderators don't mind), as this is a lot of reading (which may be reviewer deterrent). […]

I believe there may be some language barrier context in play, given that they seem to be misinterpreting a lot of general forum guidelines. They misunderstood "Try to reply by editing your post so reviewers will tend to critique to 0-1 replied posts.." as "don't reply to anyone at all to keep the post count as low as possible", hence their recent thread here: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12268112/a-mail-order-slime-mate

Anyway, I dropped a cease-and-desist. Ban on next infraction?

They've also got some more ideas threads posted recently that didn't do well, which is not an improvement from their previous idea spamming.

Of note, they've also been sending me a lot of PM requests lately and it's been getting kind of pester-y. All these were sent in the last 24 hours or so:

+ show block

As a member about as long as my SCP had appeared in my hands, I want you to review my idea… actually it's since I see you as the best SCP Foundation admin. Also I really don't know what to do with my Infinite Cookie Jar idea since my critique just says it was shaky idea with goosebumps/creepypasta fluff. Also the chatroom doesn't function for my PlayStation 4 in any form.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12256801/a-water-gun-with-a-marketing-flaw the idea I wanted reviewed and my 16:20 response comment deleted since I forgot to just edit my post.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12239575 infinite cookie jar. It's optional to look at.

I hope I'm not bothering you like this.

You have technically gave me a review but I'm stuck in a loop since I have to get two greenlights before a draft can be made, I cannot get a link to the sandbox without a user's request. But I did get an actual redlight from a person who said my idea should be scrapped. I read that there is no redlight and she was an active user with a harsh critique.

But I'm opened to suggestions, even an overhaul.

I have made a backup already for those two in a sandbox. I'm not adding the third one (dragonewt symbiote, I think) after my heart got a bit hurt.

This was redlighted. http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12239108

I'm asking for a critique from a heavily active member who has seen and honestly dealt with everything. So yes, I am asking. Also I abandoned that post without seeing your edits until today, my bad. Also who wrote that there is no such thing as you cannot get redlighted in a forum post? It's in the wiki here somewhere.

I have something that you might like. I want to get this idea fully developed. I was looking at the butterfly roster that will benefit me the most. http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12268112/a-mail-order-slime-mate

At least read my reply to ihp and help me make it less creepy. Plus there are few who like mythology.

It isn't a fully developed idea like my first three, and suggestions are accepted. Plus I never seen slimes used that often.

If you look at it and it needs an overhaul, at least I want to do a slime idea in some way.

I can provide my own responses for further context if necessary. But I do feel like this user really needs to calm down and lurk moar.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Jacob Conwell 02 Aug 2019 13:51

I'd agree with a ban on the next infraction if only to force them to take the time to cool off if they don't take such time by themselves.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

AdminBright 02 Aug 2019 23:14

agreed

---

Admin, SCP Wiki

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Zyn 03 Aug 2019 04:56

And today, they posted two more ideas threads, as well as what looks like a full draft in the draft forum (no greenlights) in a post that they edited 18 times.

Given the sheer cluelessness and lack of improvement after repeatedly being addressed by staff, I've implemented a weeklong ban per consensus above. PM will be sent by another staff member as this user has a habit of pestering and mentioning me specifically (which they did out of the blue in a forum post today which they edited over in the same minute: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-10629348/new-draft-forum-policies#post-4320833)

ETA: literally minutes after the ban was implemented, they started spamming PMs at me

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12270055/a-slime-that-decides-with-dice is locked without any indication why. It is already a finished draft as you locked it. Any thoughts on it first?

I got banned by wikidot.

I have no words

Putrefax misinterpretated my message.

You said to put a draft in the draft area, then delete my post, then banned me, then tell me to put the draft in the sandbox and in a different forum, then removed viewing the site, then please don't do what I think what you'll do next.

The severe misunderstanding and accusations are not making a good case for them. Also, I never locked the thread they mentioned above, simply put the usual "use the sandbox" copypasta and the "you need two greenlights" staff message.

Though it is pretty telling that their first response to the indication that they broke guidelines is to ask for feedback. We don't want forum-goers to think that by causing messes for staff to clean up that they can get extra critique attention.

Butterfly Squad… we may need to blacklist this one.

Last edited on 03 Aug 2019 05:13 by Zyn Show more

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

ProcyonLotor 03 Aug 2019 05:33

I sent the ban PM and recieved two PMs myself:

I can't find any information leading to this so i'll take your word.
If any of my ideas do get greenlights, message me the day I am unbanned.

Followed shortly by:

I edited my post too much, did I?

I responded to the first with a link to this thread and a professionally worded "lol no", didn't respond to the second at all!

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Zyn 03 Aug 2019 05:51

They're still PMing me:

+ show block

Yes, you can blacklist me. My user is detained. I can't see anything anymore.
[link to a twitter post, which read]:

http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-12240169/disciplinary-aphrodia …

If I had seen this sooner… I would have stopped. I accept blacklist as I, well, now know what I done… My user is now detained and at gunpoint. Go ahead and shoot her… She deserved it… #SCPWiki
If you are reading this, let it happen.

Sent back:

The ban is noted as one week, so when that time has passed, the ban will be lifted and you can re-apply for site membership. Furthermore, if you log out of your wikidot account, you can still browse the SCP wiki as a guest. A blacklist pertains solely to critique being given, not being part of the site as a whole. The overdramatic twitter post is entirely unnecessary and reflects poorly on you as a prospective community member.

Please use this week away from the site to slow down, and take your time to read through guidelines and understand how the forums work.

---

I saw my entire crime in 05Command. I… Saw more than I should. I… Hurted people and never knew.

Note: after this post, I'll stop talking. Please restrict me as soon as the week is over. Please. I beg you.

Bye, I'll see you and your team next week. I won't talk to you or anyone in the wiki until then, and reject my Kaktus membership acceptance too.

Sent back:

Please restrict me as soon as the week is over. Please. I beg you.

Please be more specific regarding what you mean by "restrict".

Bye, I'll see you and your team next week.

Do not pester me or my team for reviews when you return. You have already submitted an excessive number of requests to me in the past two days.

Last edited on 03 Aug 2019 06:15 by Zyn Show more

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Zyn 20 Aug 2019 06:08

Re-applied, accepted. Keep an eye on.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Zyn 23 Aug 2019 06:02

…and today they posted the following review: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12392924/waffle-house#post-4338007

I'm not a Butterfly squad member, but I'll try to critique this with my opinion. I had been doing problematic feedback in the past, but I'm trying to do better.

I would like to see what you incorporated, as if the IRC chatroom likes it, I might like it. But I'll go by what you gave us. I like reviewing extra information if it exists.

It feeds off of mental illness, could being a moron count too? I'd suggest feeding off of negative emotions, like depression, anxiety, stress, anger… Well, depression is a mental illness in some cases.

What type of negative mental energy is released? Like depressing thoughts, or a sense of dread? A sense of dread sounds interesting to me.

I been to Waffle House numerous times. Quality service, happy people, and good food, well, I haven't tried their lunch menu yet… Where was I? Oh, right. Why Waffle House in particular? McDonald's, Subway, or other restraunts could work, as people who need cheap food who don't get much money go to McDonald's. I don't see any mental illness often from Waffle House, nor angry people.

I suggest a butterfly squad member should take a closer look at what this needs. Last time I explained how to do something, it backfired as I misinterpreted it. There is something off and missing about this, as someone experienced will take the time to point it out. I also am incapable of doing a good critique from what I read here.

I'm particularly unsure about the "It feeds off of mental illness, could being a moron count too? I'd suggest feeding off of negative emotions, like depression, anxiety, stress, anger… Well, depression is a mental illness in some cases." bit. If they're going to attempt to give feedback on a topic like mental illness that needs to be handled tactfully, they really shouldn't be handling it so flippantly.

I believe it's time for a C&D. Honestly surprised one hasn't been dropped yet.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

RockTeethMothEyes 23 Aug 2019 06:23

Responded to the post, followed up with a PM, contents of which can be found under the collapsible.

+ show block

Hello.

I have responded to a recent critique that you have offered a user, as it was found to be problematic. You can find it here.

To reiterate: you are now required to have at least one successful mainsite article before providing reviews to other users' threads. This is a staff order. Failure to abide by this will result in further action from staff.

Thank you, and have a nice day.

— RockTeethMothEyes, Operational Staff - Forum Criticism Team

EDIT: Received a reply:

At least review his as my apology to him. I had also responded yesterday to posts with no butterfly squad members, found all the way to page 23+. Even one with no comments except his. Put those on my record as well, please.

I apologize on my behalf. I will post once every two days, as I already have one post unresponded.
I will not reply to you after this.

I'm assuming by "page 23+", they mean pages 2 and 3 and onward, but I might be mistaken. In any case, may need to do some clean-up. I've been corrected in that this means they were, in fact, responding to threads from page 20 onward, mostly author doubleposts and the like.

Last edited on 23 Aug 2019 07:06 by RockTeethMothEyes Show more

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

OccultistMave 23 Aug 2019 15:51

Post made with permission from ProcyonLotor

---

Noting that they made this thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12395868/reference-to-my-other-two-critiques
Two things worth noting: They think RTME gave permission to make this thread, and they might be unaware of the staff site. Thread locked by Procy.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

ProcyonLotor 23 Aug 2019 16:40

Somewhere in this heap of borderline delusional lunacy is a confession that they didn't explicitly believe they had permission:

She did this out of her own free will without RockTeethMothEyes permission.

No, I don't know why it's in third person either.

I think it's time this user was removed from our site in one fashion or another.

It might also be worth noting this user's strange obsession with kaktus. More than a little bizarre.

Last edited on 23 Aug 2019 16:44 by ProcyonLotor Show more

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

OccultistMave 23 Aug 2019 16:57

Noting that they have left the site and will never join again.
http://repair-scp.wikidot.com/forum/t-12396357#post-4338477

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

ProcyonLotor 23 Aug 2019 16:58

I've heard that one before.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Leveritas 23 Aug 2019 17:03

We can only hope.

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

ProcyonLotor 23 Aug 2019 20:44

This would usually be outside our remit, but I am noting this just in case the user tries to use this to drum up sympathy upon their inevitable request to be readmitted. Here is them faking a troll on their own sadass little wiki:

Warning: Big yikes ahead

You can see towards the bottom where Aphrodia forgets to leave guest mode while switching from the troll account.

Last edited on 23 Aug 2019 20:45 by ProcyonLotor Show more

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

Shanor 23 Aug 2019 20:49

Welp, that's my sympathy quota for the year wasted…

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

OccultistMave 08 Sep 2019 02:57

Post made with permission from ProcyonLotor

---

They made a new post (http://repair-scp.wikidot.com/forum/t-12503680#post-4355091) and dropped by 17 today.
Logs

+ show block

NotHannahJudy> im banned from the repair site. can you help me? i cant reply to there but you gave her ip address for me, so thanks you
9:44 PM ⇐ BoogeyMobile23 quit (moc.duolccri.nevahenots.3D9C5318-CRInys|728152diu#moc.duolccri.nevahenots.3D9C5318-CRInys|728152diu) Quit: Connection closed for inactivity
9:45 PM <•edna> Ops
9:45 PM → Laneous and •Dora (halfopped) joined
9:46 PM •CorvusCaurinus banned *!*@synIRC-9F0C5F5E.lightspeed.gnbonc.sbcglobal.net (+b)
9:46 PM ⇐ Prior quit (moc.duolccri.nevahenots.D63E3DE3-CRInys|19907diu#moc.duolccri.nevahenots.D63E3DE3-CRInys|19907diu) Quit: Connection closed for inactivity
9:46 PM ← NotHannahJudy (~ten.labolgcbs.cnobng.deepsthgil.E5F5C0F9-CRInys|tibbiM#ten.labolgcbs.cnobng.deepsthgil.E5F5C0F9-CRInys|tibbiM) was kicked by •CorvusCaurinus: we have no responsibility for aphrodia's idiocy! Have a nice day!

Re: Disciplinary - Aphrodia

ProcyonLotor 08 Sep 2019 03:16

User's been permanently banned from 17 and their 19 ban has been updated. This idiocy has been tolerated long enough.