Non-Disc Record - Schrodingers_Kitty

Summary:

Unhelpful forum feedback, overreacting, spam/self-blaming

Schrodingers_Kitty

Zyn 04 May 2015 02:05

New member Schrodingers_Kitty recently posted, among other slightly-questionable comments, the following feedback: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1183947/first-scp#post-2285033

[trimmed]

nine black, talon-like appendages will eject from SCP-2XXX. Two from each wrist, two from each of the soles of the feet and one from the neck.

Nope. Not going near that.

moving at high speeds clocking at up to 48 kph

Oh hell no.

[trimmed]

Staffposted, gave them the usual "please hold off on critique until successful mainsite page" spiel. Also, given the following:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1182535/deletions-28:not-only-can-water-float-a-boat#post-2282524
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1184305/on-scp-2144#post-2282525
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-160460/log-of-anomalous-items#post-2284336 (and other similarly spammy posts)
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1185516/draft-up#post-2284376 (randomly posting on someone elses draft thread to announce their own SCP idea)

Keep an eye on them.

Last edited on 04 May 2015 17:11 by Zyn Show more

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

RJB_R 05 May 2015 20:18

Staffposted here:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1185032/something#post-2286423

---

Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

Zyn 06 May 2015 01:06

TroyL also staffposted here: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1186664/been-in-my-sandbox-a-while-did-a-little-work#post-2286431

They retracted their statement when they noticed (they didn't see Roget's staffpost). Personally, I'd really like to see them spending less words on belittling themselves. Pretty much all their critiques involved some mention of their own failed drafts, plus there was this random spampost on someone's thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1187988/scp-2989-sandbox#post-2286414

So yeah, official warning next infraction, not a bit deal atm.

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

ProcyonLotor 05 May 2015 22:53

Recommending official warning should they give any more crit in violation of the orders.

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

ProcyonLotor 06 May 2015 19:34

I got a PM from a chat user today about someone who had reacted poorly to neutral critique, and, surprise surprise surprise, it was Schrodingers_Kitty. We got both a flip out and yet another of their seriously endless pity parties. I staffposted, but I'd recommend escalation to an official warning on the "I suck feel sorry for me" posts, as this is not the first (or second) time I have received complaints about this user.
e: At no point in that rambling, incoherent post was I even close to anything that could be considered a link… I award myself no points and may god have mercy on my soul.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1188073/the-ice-blade#post-2286999
e: Official warning given by Clef.

Last edited on 06 May 2015 20:20 by ProcyonLotor Show more

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

ProcyonLotor 06 May 2015 20:44

Followed shortly by this little gem, which does pretty much all of the stuff they'd just been told not to do.

Display post in question

You know what, no. No. I'm done. I don't care whether it should be Kelvins or not. I don't care about an Inuit pun. I'm done. I don't want to be told I'm making a pity party because I won't need to. I'm officially shutting down. You can abandon this thread if you like, I don't need it anymore. This review is over, this thread is gone. I'm not dealing with this anymore. I know I can't take any kind of review at this point, good or bad. Don't PM me, don't talk to me, don't review my stuff. Unless it's staff that needs to PM or talk to me, I don't want to be interacted with.

Last edited on 06 May 2015 21:26 by Zyn Show more

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

Riemann 06 May 2015 20:48

Locked the thread.

Edit: I locked the linked thread, not this one on 05.

Last edited on 06 May 2015 20:48 by Riemann Show more

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

Zyn 06 May 2015 21:33

…followed by another thread, apologizing and announcing them taking time off from the site… they're still missing the point. Staffposted, locked that thread, and if they keep this up, I'm down with a 24 hour ban.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1189166/i-think-i-m-going-to-go-for-a-while

+ show block

I know I've been a horrible annoyance around the site lately, and I think I just need to take some time to relax and calm down and avoid this site for a while. I don't know when I'll be back, but I want to genuinely apologize to everyone. I apologize to the members, I apologize to the staff, I apologize to anyone else on the site. I know this is probably going to make everything worse with my current reputation. And that's fine. I have made very dumb choices. I don't want to always be known as the person who makes dumb and useless SCPs and can't take even the lightest criticism. That's not who I really am, and it's not someone I ever want to be. I hope that, when I return, you can forgive me for my actions. Goodbye.

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

(account deleted) 06 May 2015 23:59

Jesus, yeah. 24 sounds good.

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

Eskobar 07 May 2015 10:44

I like the sound of a 24-hour primarily because I think we need something longer later on down the line, and there's no reason to ignore this, let them go on their own little sojourn, and then have them come back with the same behavior later. A 24-hour ban is useless on its own merits (if they're going to be self-removing themselves anyway) but useful in the long run.

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

djkaktus 07 May 2015 17:04

I also second this. I can see this kind of thing getting out of hand quickly.

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

RJB_R 07 May 2015 17:28

24 hour ban sounds like a plan.

---

Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

Dexanote 07 May 2015 22:46

24 hour ban.

Re: Schrodingers_Kitty

Crayne 08 May 2015 07:13

Supporting a 24h ban. Fully expect them to either disappear or get perma'd at some point if this pattern of behavior continues.