Non-Disc Record - errorlypse

Summary:

unauthorized edit, cluelessness, unhelpful feedback

errorlypse

Crayne 01 Apr 2015 18:54

User errorlypse does not match any existing user name took it upon themselves to edit SCP-2375, and did a bad job of it too. Sent the standard "don't do that, do this!" PM. They also appear to be fairly clueless about how drafting and posting works, as evidenced on the discussion thread for SCP-2127.

One to watch.

Re: errorlypse

Zyn 01 Apr 2015 19:26

Noting that the user's current activity doesn't really convince me that they know what's going on.

From the discussion page of a coldpost that wasn't even their article to begin with:

I need help getting an article approved so I don't write something like this.

In someone else's year-old draft thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-774895/draft-of-scp-2337#post-2262221

How do you post your drafts like this to get judged for submition
I have a sandbox already.

On Bright's list: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-115448/the-things-dr-bright-is-not-allowed-to-do-at-the-foundation#post-2262264

There is no SCP ∞ and it neither would be his privets.

Also, noting that they made a sandbox titled "Aaaaaaaaaa": http://scpsandbox2.wikidot.com/aaaaaaaaaa
The text is simply "Aààaßaaaaàààaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"

Moving for membership revocation. Edit: Btw already flagged as abusive.

Last edited on 01 Apr 2015 19:28 by Zyn Show more

Re: errorlypse

Sophia Light 02 Apr 2015 03:00

Revocation seems in order here.

Re: errorlypse

Zyn 02 Apr 2015 00:40

And more:

Reply to self, plus apparently worried about people stealing his draft: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1162015/how-can-i-edit-my-scp-errorlypse#post-2262378

Unhelpful critique: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1161399/my-very-first-scp#post-2262376

Good. I think it fits within the scp universe.

Re: errorlypse

Crayne 02 Apr 2015 05:38

After the first round of flailing, I was hesitant about jumping to revocation, but yeah, it's time.

Re: errorlypse

TroyL 02 Apr 2015 06:23

Revoked. Someone please send a message explaining the situation to them.

---

"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato

Re: errorlypse

Crayne 02 Apr 2015 07:12

PM sent.

+ show block

Your membership of the SCP Wiki has been revoked as a result of your behavior on the fora and the wiki. Please familiarize yourself with our community's rules and standards for behavior as documented in your required reading. You may reapply after 24 hours. Please make sure you don't repeat this pattern of behavior in the future, or other disciplinary actions may follow.

For the record, you can find your disciplinary thread here.

Got a very civil response:

+ show block

We don't generally delete posts unless rules have been broken. You haven't broken any rules, just shown a lack of understanding of said rules and the behavior we expect from members. Your sandbox will never be deleted, so there's no need to worry about that. Simply do the required reading again and perhaps get a bit more of a feel for how we do things around the wiki before you dive in again. There's no shame in getting your bearings before you participate. :)

Last edited on 02 Apr 2015 11:24 by Crayne Show more

Re: errorlypse

Wogglebug 02 Apr 2015 17:50

I'm confused, are you sure that's the response they sent? Or is it your response to their response?

Last edited on 02 Apr 2015 17:51 by Wogglebug Show more

Re: errorlypse

Crayne 02 Apr 2015 19:29

Oh seriously. I am such an idiot. Yeah, that's my reply. Wait a minute.

Or, you know, don't. Apparently I already deleted their response. :|

Anyway, it was them saying revocation was fair enough and a request to delete their threads on the forum, but not to delete their sandbox.

Last edited on 02 Apr 2015 19:32 by Crayne Show more