New site user Dr Kenyon has recently given some unhelpful feedback. I've sent them a PM with the usual cease-and-desist.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1161546/scp-xxxx-gray-old-god-ain-t-what-he-used-ta-be#post-2261611
I like its weirdness but it is painfully short and not detailed enough. Remember you are a scientist you should treat this like a scientific analysis. You wrote it more like an essay.
Again Great idea poor execution keep working on it buddy.
On a coldpost currently at -20 (note that the subject line was "Buddy listen…") There may have been other questionable posts on now-deleted articles.
Dude there is no meat to this post. Remember you're a scientist and your recording a paranormal creature.
Also this creature with this limited information is kinda uninteresting you should rework this and post a new draft to the drafts and critiques forum to get feedback before trying to become official.
I think you can do it but take your time. I'm working on an SCP too and i spent about 5 hours collectively on it and its still not ready.
And just to note, they've been derping around a bit with ways to terminate 682 (both of these are comment chains):
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1093854/scp-2322#post-2260528
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-76858/scp-682#post-2260504
Keep an eye on them.