Non-Disc Record - Ueskay

Summary:

Spamming, complete ignorance of site procedure

Ueskay

(account deleted) 27 Dec 2014 19:38

User Ueskay has posted three incorrectly formatted, effort-free articles in the space of about ten minutes that demonstrate absolutely no knowledge of the article template, review process, or anything else. One of those is currently in a summary deletion vote for being exactly the same as another article he posted two minutes prior. I issued a warning here that further evidence of not having immediately gone back and read/understood the guides would result in revocation.

EDIT: Has now posted this:

oh, how do i remove this. i want to actually TAKE TIME to make one i spent 2 seconds on this..

The Deletion Guide is required reading. Moving for revocation.

Last edited on 27 Dec 2014 19:49 by (account deleted) Show more

Re: Ueskay

Drewbear 27 Dec 2014 19:55

One the plagiarism one that was summarily deleted, he managed to get in the following comment right before everything went bye-bye:

Yea, i call poopy on this one. i spent almost no time whatsoever, go ahead and delete it i might as well read everything on teh page and then write one. i accedentally kept in the 049, and i didnt even come to think of 173 when i wrote this.. i just thought of poop alot, i guess thats why my SCP's are like that, cuz dere poo…

Calling for revocation due to very, very clearly not getting the whole "don't fling shit at the wall" aspect of the site.

---

Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.

Last edited on 27 Dec 2014 19:55 by Drewbear Show more

Re: Ueskay

(account deleted) 27 Dec 2014 20:02

Yeah, revoke.

Re: Ueskay

Vincent_Redgrave 27 Dec 2014 20:02

Agreeing, especially after the repost. This guy is just going to be a headache for us.

Re: Ueskay

ProcyonLotor 27 Dec 2014 19:49

One of these articles, the soon-to-be-gone 2067, plagiarizes SCP-049 directly, with them both starting with the following line:

Special Containment Procedures: SCP-049 is to be contained in a secure holding cell in Research Sector-██.

Kid didn't even change the number.
Summary is in progress is done.
Nthing revocation.

Last edited on 27 Dec 2014 19:56 by ProcyonLotor Show more

Re: Ueskay

Drewbear 27 Dec 2014 20:01

Reposted 2067 literally less than 2 minutes after it had been deleted, completely unchanged. Summarily deleting.

---

Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.

Re: Ueskay

Drewbear 27 Dec 2014 20:09

Membership revoked w/ 4 Staff, including 1 Admin, for reasons above. I sent the following PM:

I am speaking to you in my capacity as an Admin of the SCP Foundation wiki.

You have recently demonstrated very little understanding of the Site rules and guidelines, including coldposting multiple unfinished works in a short time frame, partially plagiarizing SCP-049, and reposting a deleted article within minutes of its deletion with absolutely no changes made to it.

Your membership has been temporarily revoked. Please take this time to re-read the Newbie Guides and Site Rules. You are free to reapply in 24 hours.

Unban in:

Removed. —Moose

---

Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.

Last edited on 27 Dec 2014 23:38 by thedeadlymoose Show more

Re: Ueskay

thedeadlymoose 27 Dec 2014 23:38

Okay, just a heads up, this is a 24 hour ban, not a revoke, and only one admin has approved this, which is fine for a revoke but not fine for a ban unless there's active trolling happening.

I don't see trolling. I see incoherence and stupidity. IE, I see grounds for a revoke.

I am gonna go ahead and remove that ban.

Apologies for confusion, everyone. Let's just consider this the revocation that it was supposed to be :)

/me high fives Drew for admin confusion~

Last edited on 28 Dec 2014 00:05 by thedeadlymoose Show more