Disciplinary - PrDielson

Summary:

Troll/unfinished articles, vandalism

PrDielson

(account deleted) 20 Nov 2014 13:42

http://www.wikidot.com/user:info/prdielson
Posted two troll/unfinished articles which were basically contentless in the space of 15 mins (Procyon will be along with screens shortly)
Also added "if you not, you die" to the bit on the Joke SCPs page about what to keep in mind.

Recommending a revocation at minimum.

Re: PrDielson

ProcyonLotor 20 Nov 2014 14:07

Screens here.
I see no point in not banning the guy- this wasn't an accident.

Re: PrDielson

Drewbear 20 Nov 2014 14:07

I want to see the screencaps, but good lord.

Yeah, I'm behind a 24-hour revocation. Unless the 'caps show something egregious, I wouldn't go so far as a ban.

---

Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.

Re: PrDielson

Crayne 20 Nov 2014 14:13

Could be utter cluelessness. Between those two shitfest pages, they also added the words ", if you not, you die" to the top paragraph of the Joke SCP listing.

I'm not really inclined to go for anything other than a banslap though. At this level of dumbfuckery, revocation's not going to do any good.

For the record, pages have been deleted and recorded here, and both Procyon and I flagged the user as abusive.

Last edited on 20 Nov 2014 14:57 by Crayne Show more

Re: PrDielson

thedeadlymoose 21 Nov 2014 00:24

We revoke for being excessively clue-free and rampaging through the wiki, basically. We don't revoke as a step before a ban, or as a "ban-lite". Far as I understand, anyway.

Posting a page of "nhknnnknknj guyvbuihhhvijvivj" isn't something you can do with good intentions.

It's basic trolling. Not in a particularly interesting or abusive way, just mundane trolling. Supporting a 24 hour ban.

(Drewbear, please check the screens, else your vote counts against a ban.)

Re: PrDielson

Drewbear 21 Nov 2014 13:34

24 hour ban works for me.

---

Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.

Re: PrDielson

TroyL 21 Nov 2014 16:32

Thirding. Also, given this:

User blanked both SCP Series I and II. Reverted.

Recommending perma instead. Blatant trolling. I'm carrying out the ban presently.

---

"WELL FOUNDATION. YOU MADE IT SO EASY. SO VERY VERY EASY." - dimensionpotato

Re: PrDielson

Crayne 21 Nov 2014 17:09

Two thumbs up for perma. Holla.

Re: PrDielson

(account deleted) 21 Nov 2014 18:00

3rding, if only after the fact.

Re: PrDielson

Photosynthetic 21 Nov 2014 18:40

Thanks, Troy. After the blanking of the series, I'd have carried it out myself if you didn't beat me to it.

Re: PrDielson

Drewbear 21 Nov 2014 18:44

Wow. Yeah, perma.

---

Giving bearhugs to the unsuspecting since 1872.

Re: PrDielson

(account deleted) 21 Nov 2014 00:27

24 hours is likely 23.99 hours more than necessary for them to lose interest, but for what it's worth, I support.

Re: PrDielson

ProcyonLotor 21 Nov 2014 16:31

User blanked both SCP Series I and II. Reverted.

Re: PrDielson

djkaktus 21 Nov 2014 18:56

Brotha is straight anti-traditionalist.