Non-Disc Record - brovo

Re: brovo

Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:10:31 +0000

I would ask him to explain the situation with these assistant writers. Who knows maybe he's literally got someone typing for him for whatever reason where he himself cannot. However this makes him look bad and he should have his chance to explain himself before I suggest summary Deletion or further discipline.

Re: brovo

Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:15:14 +0000

(for posterity's sake)

(posted by Zyn in reply to the above)

even though i had several assistant writers i take full credit for the insensitive content

apologize for my assistant writers cruelty,

…if it's not your writing that you're posting here, then you're effectively plagiarizing the work of your assistant writers.

Furthermore, we don't allow shared accounts here. If you want to take responsibility for this, either have your assistant writer(s) get their own account(s) or start writing your own stuff.

Re: brovo

Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:29:56 +0000

Frankly, the guy's in trouble no matter what he says.

- if the "assistant writers" actually do exist and he's blaming them for the tastelessness but still taking credit for it, he's plagiarizing
- the assistants do exist and they collab'd on the article, then they're sharing accounts, which is against the rules
- if they don't exist at all, he's lying to staff

He says he's taking responsibility… let's see if he does.

Re: brovo

Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:09:09 +0000

He replied to me with

i am taking responsibility which is kind of why im here taking time to look over everything and make sure its good and even though i had several assistant writers i take full credit for the insensitive content which I've taken out for your information and I am still in the process of editing the SCP.

brovo

Mon, 14 Apr 2014 22:58:05 +0000

Posted an OP deathmonster thing responsible for multiple real-life tragedies such as the Holocaust, 9/11, and the Boston Marathon bombing. Removed the rating module after Aelanna added it. Was called out on both those things in the discussion thread.

Excerpts from the discussion thread, in the order they show up on the page:

(posted by Bryx)
Removing the rating module doesn't prevent anyone from downvoting.

(posted by brovo)
i know it was a accident

(posted by brovo)
I'm here to thank you, and apologize for my assistant writers cruelty, yes I know those incidents are unacceptable and I am working on editing the SCP to take those out, thank you for the constructive criticism we are using all this information to make this SCP better

(posted by me in reply to the above, after Procyon's post)
First, you can reply to a specific post by hitting the "reply" link below it on the right.

Second, take responsibility for your own actions like the mature 15-years-old-or-older person your membership on this site claims you to be. Claiming that you did not deliberately remove the rating module (and just the writing module) and blaming insensitive content on an "assistant writer" makes you seem both dishonest and immature. Even if your "assistant writer" is not completely fictitious, it's still your responsibility to look over what they added and make sure it was acceptable.

(posted by ProcyonLotor)
Brovo, do not remove the rating module again. It must be on any article submitted to the site, and removing it is a breach of site rules.

(posted by brovo)
it was a miss understanding and I apologize