I'm guessing this is just naiveté with regards to not being familiar with the full extent of what the community and staff had to deal with (and are effectively still dealing with, since we do get the occasional troll/spammer from time to time). That said, given their previous behavior and the fact that they don't have many other recent posts… might merit keeping an eye on.

I don't see this post as anything but you trying to get the last word in and attaining moral highground.
You could've left by only saying "I have nothing left to say"

Your criticism shows you are not very experienced. I was only pointing that out.
I'm sure a more experienced writer would have a much different opinion than your's which is overly cynical. This is an ideas forum, nothing says I need perfect grammar here, despite you saying it constantly. And even if a more experienced writer has the same opinion here, I'm sure they would be able to explain things better to me than you can.

But uh, thank you for writing anyways.
Am I being overly defensive?

We may need to move into another official warning or potentially a ban. They've already been revoked and warned last year about their behavior.

Quotes include:

The stuff you were suggesting in the first post was overly nitpicky.

Lazer sounds cooler, and should probably be the way to spell it, freakin dictionary and their boring spellings… regardless. I do have spellcheck, but this is not my "work" it is an idea on an idea forum (do i need to reiterate this) that does not need to be "professional."

It's an anomalous object, they do these things.

I don't really see how it's overcomplicated, see the brief explanation in the beginning. Its like 3 sentences long, it's not complicated.

Butterfly Squad, be advised. If they react this way to one of you, feel free to decline any requests from them moving forward.

I'm guessing they're just young and don't know better, but this is starting to edge into creep territory for me.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-7634213/biofluency-gel#post-4002463

At it's current state, the scp is just a thing that does a thing. Or wierd science. Its not interesting or seemingly innovative at all. I feel like as a site, we have moved away from things that do things and more into narrative exploration.

But Currently, it's not very interesting.
Did you run this idea through ideas and br~
oh this IS ideas and brainstorming.
I'm gonna leave this to the mods but I dont quite think this belongs here.

Good luck.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-7635454/the-creator#post-4002388

The story is a good moral lesson on how to not be stupid and I sorta like it, its akin to sylvester and the magic pebble. But the dude's power is like, way too strong. Like

regardless of how big, small, destructive, it would happen

Why not just destroy everything around him and escape??

In my opinion, the storytelling concept unique but lacks a good anomaly to truly execute it.
We already have a ton of reality benders, I mean you could make it work but with how cliched reality benders are, you are going to have to work hard to make it work.

Keep an eye on. It's been almost a year since their last problematic behavior, but if this becomes a habit we move immediately to C&D.

TechDoomsday

• http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-3929318/scp-xxxx-doll-goblins#post-3609254
• http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-3864806/scp-data-expunged-j:the-data-expunged-switch#post-3606362
• http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-3951185/containment-breach-unforeseen-circumstances-a-soma-mod#post-3611117 (revoked for this)
• http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-3964550/an-idea-thats-been-stuck-in-my-head#post-3613451
• Today: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-2276582/scp-3061#post-3639954

[…]This criticism is not helpful and potentially harmful. I, as a user, urge you to read the scp guides before performing any more criticism. Had the creator taken your criticism, the article may have been further deteriorated.

[under a collapsible] The above can be seen as backseat modding, but backseat modding is defined as telling other users how to act on the site, I am only telling them how to improve their criticism.
This is not intentionally backseat modding in my perspective

Given the history of this behavior and the fact that they've gotten a revoke, dropped an official warning and sent them a PM. We move to bans on further infractions.

ETA: received reply. Am refraining from providing judgment on content.

Yeah, I know, you didn't need to remind me of previous staff intervention though.
Sorry about that, again. I won't try to do this stuff anymore. Unless I am staff of course which I know I probably wont be in at least a couple years span of time.

Thanks for notifying me. -3-
(ps: This doesn't lose me any zyn-brownie points does it?)