Non-Disc Record - Morphogenetic_Field / Reiesu http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705/non-disc-record-morphogenetic-field-reiesu Posts in the discussion thread "Non-Disc Record - Morphogenetic_Field / Reiesu" - Coldposting Fri, 08 May 2026 14:34:37 +0000 http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705#post-2764279 Re: Non-Disc Record - Morphogenetic_Field / Reiesu http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705/non-disc-record-morphogenetic-field-reiesu#post-2764279 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:41:48 +0000 Zyn 1404533 Site Charter, Site Discipline tab: http://05command.wikidot.com/site-charter

Any member of Staff may make a thread in the Minor User Issues or Major User Issues subforums to document possible disciplinary violations. These threads are for discussion of the user's behavior and documentation of pervasive behavioral trends on the user's part.
Any member of Staff may make a suggestion regarding possible disciplinary actions in response to a user's behavior. […]

As such, Disciplinary thread is now here: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2158991/disciplinary-morphogenetic-field

]]> http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705#post-2764225 Re: Non-Disc Record - Morphogenetic_Field / Reiesu http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705/non-disc-record-morphogenetic-field-reiesu#post-2764225 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:24:55 +0000 MayD 1422059 And they seem to be back at it again, using the same slot as before: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2629. This was made two hours ago.

Looking through their profile, still no sandbox use or seeking of feedback. I don't know if I'm allowed to, as I am neither disc staff or operational staff, but I feel something a bit stronger than a revoke would be in order.

]]> http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705#post-2762659 Re: Non-Disc Record - Morphogenetic_Field http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705/non-disc-record-morphogenetic-field-reiesu#post-2762659 Wed, 08 Mar 2017 06:39:43 +0000 Zyn 1404533 Wikidot profile history shows no usage of the sandbox since March 2, which is before the slough of coldposts.

Also, no forum usage for asking for draft help.

Double-checked with staff in chat about it, revoked membership, PM sent.

ETA: going to start doing this, since it helps me remember, and besides, I PM this stuff already.

Relevant policy page: http://www.scp-wiki.net/site-rules

Posting: Do not spam the site with shitty articles. If staff tell you to slow down or stop posting, listen to them.

]]> http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705#post-2762583 Re: Non-Disc Record - Morphogenetic_Field http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705/non-disc-record-morphogenetic-field-reiesu#post-2762583 Wed, 08 Mar 2017 05:32:01 +0000 2788421 They have since posted another coldpost, which is currently at -7.

http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2629

In the comment section, they made titled their author post as "I tried

It's a hearted attempt and I get it if you don't like it. :/

link: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-2156638/scp-2629#post-2762549

]]> http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705#post-2760257 Non-Disc Record - Morphogenetic_Field http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-2151705/non-disc-record-morphogenetic-field-reiesu#post-2760257 Sun, 05 Mar 2017 00:55:19 +0000 Sirens 2802387 New site member Morphogenetic_FieldMorphogenetic_Field (Account age: 36 days, Site Membership: 13 days) has posted four low quality articles without seeking feedback over the course of the last week despite being informed of the feedback process on the discussion page of every article they've posted. On their third post, I advised them to slow down and take time to seek feedback prior to posting, but today they've posted yet another low quality article, a -J currently at -17, http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-91028301-j/comments/show, the contents of which are as follows:

Item #: SCP-91028301

Object Class: Increta Zethin

Special Containment Procedures: Keep it in my drawer and let it explode

Description: Every time you lie,your pants will explode

Addendum: Noooooooooooo. Nope. Nada. Novo. No no nooooooooo.

After conferring with Soulless, I shot them a PM and informed them of the critique process and once again advised them to slow down a little.

+ show PM 

ETA: Got a reply.

+ show reply 

I'm unsure of whether or not posting four low quality articles over the course of a week is considered spamming, but I thought I'd post this just in case. Keep an eye on?

]]>