<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>AI Record - alwaysjppo</title>
		<link>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17582425/ai-record-alwaysjppo</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;AI Record - alwaysjppo&quot; - Posted AI page to mainsite, has AI sandbox, lied about AI usage</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 04:49:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17582425#post-7541002</guid>
				<title>Re: AI Record - alwaysjppo</title>
				<link>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17582425/ai-record-alwaysjppo#post-7541002</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 06:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Zyn</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1404533</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>User replied:</p> <blockquote> <p>I don’t understand, no AI was used in the making of my content, I am strongly anti-AI. I would really like to know how you decide a text is made with generative AI, since it is surprising to me.</p> <p>Thank you, I’ll be looking forward to your answer.</p> </blockquote> <p>Sent back:</p> <table class="wiki-content-table"> <tr> <td>Text comparison is the standard approach, as SCP wiki staff have hundreds of cases on file regarding AI-generated material submitted to the mainsite, forums, and sandbox; this includes cases where authors have confirmed that AI was used. Experienced readers can easily spot common AI tells, as they are extremely repetitive due to AI not being able to fundamentally understand how the standard SCP article works.</td> </tr> </table> <p>ETA: as of now, user has yet to respond to the initial ban PM chain. However, they sent this response to the staff deletion message regarding their AI coldpost</p> <blockquote> <p>no AI was used on my page, it is surprising to me that we reached that conclusion. I would very much like to appeal my ban, since it is not only blocking me from being part of the SCP community, but doing so permanently on the only account I currently and will ever have.</p> <p>Thank you, I am looking forward to your answer.</p> </blockquote> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17582425#post-7539304</guid>
				<title>AI Record - alwaysjppo</title>
				<link>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17582425/ai-record-alwaysjppo#post-7539304</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 08:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Zyn</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1404533</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Noting that new site member <span class="printuser avatarhover"><a href="http://www.wikidot.com/user:info/alwaysjppo" ><img class="small" src="https://www.wikidot.com/avatar.php?userid=10230225&amp;amp;size=small&amp;amp;timestamp=1770451419" alt="alwaysjppo" style="background-image:url(https://www.wikidot.com/userkarma.php?u=10230225)" /></a><a href="http://www.wikidot.com/user:info/alwaysjppo" >alwaysjppo</a></span> (account age 9 days, site membership 8 days) recently coldposted the following page, which has multiple indicators of AI-generation: <a href="https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9345">https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9345</a></p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">+&nbsp;show&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">–&nbsp;hide&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <div class="code"> <pre><code>[[&gt;]] [[module Rate]] [[/&gt;]] **Item #:** SCP-9345 **Object Class:** Keter **Special Containment Procedures:** SCP-9345 cannot be physically contained or neutralized. Current containment strategy prioritizes detection and documentation of SCP-XXXX manifestations through continuous monitoring of mass-casualty events, hospital fatality records, and public death announcements. Suspected SCP-9345-1 instances are to be placed under passive observation only. Under no circumstances are SCP-9345-1 subjects to be confronted regarding their anomalous status. Public exposure of SCP-9345 is to be prevented via standard disinformation protocols and retroactive record correction. Containment focus remains on preserving societal continuity rather than attempting direct interaction with SCP-9345. **Description:** SCP-9345 is an anomalous phenomenon that activates following the confirmed death of a human individual during an event involving multiple witnesses and measurable social impact. Within approximately 12 to 72 hours, SCP-9345 manifests a human entity designated SCP-9345-1. SCP-9345-1 assumes the identity of exactly one deceased individual, integrating seamlessly into all social, legal, and digital systems associated with that person. SCP-9345-1 exhibits complete biological and psychological consistency with the original individual, including memories, emotional attachments, and personal history. No observable physiological or cognitive abnormalities have been detected. To SCP-9345-1, no death has occurred. The associated fatal incident is recalled as narrowly avoided, misreported, or exaggerated. No insertion event has ever been observed. Records are retroactively corrected, eyewitness accounts realign, and all documentation reflects uninterrupted survival. SCP-9345 does not activate in cases of isolated death or when the deceased individual’s absence would not result in prolonged social disruption. In all documented instances, SCP-9345 manifestation correlates with a measurable reduction in collective grief response and long-term instability. Current working theory classifies SCP-9345 as a self-correcting continuity mechanism. SCP-9345 does not preserve life. It preserves absence. **Addendum:** [[div class=&quot;blockquote&quot;]] To the O5 Council, I am writing in response to your request for continued investigation into SCP-9345-1 instances involving high-profile civilians. Let me be unambiguous. We are not dealing with an infiltrator. We are observing a corrective process. SCP-9345 does not replace people arbitrarily. It replaces absence. In ██ separate cases, SCP-9345-1 prevented mass grief events, economic destabilization, and prolonged media panic. In one instance, projections indicate that confirmation of death would have resulted in ██ weeks of global unrest. You are asking whether one of the individuals currently living under Foundation observation is a replacement. The answer is ███. You are asking whether we should intervene. The answer is no. If we expose SCP-9345, we introduce discontinuity on a scale we are not equipped to contain. I will not authorize actions that trade philosophical certainty for practical catastrophe. Sometimes the anomaly is not the problem. Sometimes the problem is our refusal to let things continue. Any further inquiry into ██████████ will require my direct approval. — Director Henry Jones [[/div]] [[div class=&quot;blockquote&quot;]] **[REDACTED]** [[/div]] [[div class=&quot;blockquote&quot;]] **[REDACTED]** [[/div]] [[div class=&quot;blockquote&quot;]] **[REDACTED]** [[/div]] [[footnoteblock]] [[div class=&quot;footer-wikiwalk-nav&quot;]] [[=]] &lt;&lt; [[[SCP-9344]]] | SCP-9345 | [[[SCP-9346]]] &gt;&gt; [[/=]] [[/div]]</code></pre></div> </div> </div> </div> <p>Excerpts of note:</p> <blockquote> <p><strong>Special Containment Procedures:</strong><br /> SCP-9345 cannot be physically contained or neutralized.</p> <p>Current containment strategy prioritizes detection and documentation of SCP-XXXX manifestations through continuous monitoring of mass-casualty events, hospital fatality records, and public death announcements.</p> <p>Suspected SCP-9345-1 instances are to be placed under passive observation only. Under no circumstances are SCP-9345-1 subjects to be confronted regarding their anomalous status.</p> <p>Public exposure of SCP-9345 is to be prevented via standard disinformation protocols and retroactive record correction.</p> <p>Containment focus remains on preserving societal continuity rather than attempting direct interaction with SCP-9345.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>If we expose SCP-9345, we introduce discontinuity on a scale we are not equipped to contain.</p> <p>I will not authorize actions that trade philosophical certainty for practical catastrophe.</p> <p>Sometimes the anomaly is not the problem.</p> <p>Sometimes the problem is our refusal to let things continue.</p> <p>Any further inquiry into ██████████ will require my direct approval.</p> <p>— Director Henry Jones</p> </blockquote> <p>Of note, the user also has a sandbox with the same content: <a href="https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/alwaysjppo-scp-1-the-replacement">https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/alwaysjppo-scp-1-the-replacement</a> full draft was present in page creation; later edits are to remove the image code block and add blockquotes.</p> <p>Furthermore, they posted a concept thread that had some AI tells (originally did not follow template, had sentences like &quot;Current Foundation consensus classifies SCP-XXXX as a self-correcting continuity mechanism that does not preserve life, but rather prevents absence.&quot;); when addressed about AI usage, they lied about it: <a href="https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17580200/the-replacement-a-scp-idea#post-7535330">https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17580200/the-replacement-a-scp-idea#post-7535330</a></p> <blockquote> <p>Thank you! I updated my thread! I also want to assure that no AI was used in the redaction of neither the first nor the second version of this thread, I am strongly anti-AI and wouldn’t like people to feel like I used it. Hope I cleared your doubts!</p> </blockquote> <p>Permanently banned, PM sent.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>