Ban remains in place; PM sent.

Well, Central Narrative was confusing to me as well. I'm not a native English speaker, i had never seen or heard about a term as "Central Narrative". It was the part that took me the most time. I tried reading other applications, but they confused me further, so i wrote whatever made the most sense at the time. I tried looking for definitions, but those didn't make sense (even those definitions used words i wasn't familiar with), so i tried to cook up an application with words, that, i admit, i didn't know the meaning of myself. Perhaps that could've been my mistake? That is also the reason for my countless drafts. No idea what something means, doesn't sound right from an emotional standpoint, so the final version was a bit of everything. A mess, honestly.

Of note, the user has no denied applications on record.

Sent back:

User replied:

Yes. This is it.

Sent back:

Easily. For now, since I'm not at home and unable to return for the next week, i won't be able to provide drafts. As soon as i can, i will. But my explanation for this, is that firstly, i got overexcited. I started using complicated language in the pitch itself, because internally, i was excited about my idea, and was ten steps ahead in mind, even though the process was in a different state. Because of this over excitement, i spent countless hours trying to develop a a completely clinical pitch. I see my fault in that 😅. Not to mention, I'm used to writing text that's long, structured, and to most people - sounds like AI generated. For this very reason, i was in quite a debate with myself before publishing my submission, should i revise again, or actually post, knowing it may create suspicion. But putting a disclaimer that this isn't AI would've attracted more suspicion than it did, so i decided against it. Again, as soon as i get home and have access to my files, i will send the drafts to my submission, to show its orginality.

Sent back:

I wish to make a heartfelt appeal to lift the ban, because it is completely uncalled for. The content i submitted took me hours of research and thought, just so i could submit a pitch that instantly gives certain feelings to the reader/reviewer from the very start. If needed, i can provide files, research attempts, of the research of my wording, concepts and everything else considering the posted content. But everything i can prove is means to show it's completely original thought.

Sent back:

Project_Orchid

Seeking Greenlights: Yes

Page type: SCP Article

Elevator Pitch: The subject is a Euclid-class humanoid entity that produces an anomalous red hallucinogenic gas via an ornamental fan, inducing personalized fear-based hallucinations. The entity remains docile only under a simulated starry nocturnal environment and exhibits extreme psychological distress when separated from the fan. Containment depends on maintaining subject's emotional stability, not restraining by brute force.

Central Narrative: The narrative centers on the Foundation's attempt to contain an anomaly whose primary danger lies not in physical aggression, but in its psychological influence. As personnel exposure leads to lingering hallucinations and nightmares, containment shifts from standard isolation procedures to a fragile system of environmental and emotional regulation. The story explores the consequences of treating a sentient anomaly as a tool, rather than a being capable of distress.

When addressed about AI usage, the user replied: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17571987/seeking-greenlight:the-scarlet-widow#post-7522057

Yes, i simply sought out a very clinical, cold, emotionless text, so i tried including as many "sciency" if i could say wording. I've been very particular about how my work sounds, and other wording options sounded overly emotional, destroying the clinical vibe i was attempting to create

Note the inconsistency in punctuation usage and sentence structure. User has no sandbox edits (they are a sandbox member) and no other forum posts.

Permanently banned, PM sent. Rounder, Queerious, Kufat supported ban.