<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>AI Record - Ghostphyre</title>
		<link>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17478887/ai-record-ghostphyre</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;AI Record - Ghostphyre&quot; - Posted obvious AI page, AI-typical formatting, nonsensical containment procedures, triplet list pattern, extraneous subheadings, unnecessary object class explanation. Submitted AI-generated appeal</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17478887#post-7467784</guid>
				<title>Re: AI Record - Ghostphyre</title>
				<link>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17478887/ai-record-ghostphyre#post-7467784</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 08:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Zyn</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1404533</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Staff discussed the appeal; the consensus was to decline. Kufat, Esperion, and myself voted to decline.</p> <p>User was informed of the decline in the official Discord; of note, the user also admitted to violating site rules regarding account sharing not being permitted. Excerpts of text for comparison:</p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">+&nbsp;show&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">–&nbsp;hide&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>Conversation begins: <a href="https://discord.com/channels/877710488673329162/877753263271858187/1448580789695676500">https://discord.com/channels/877710488673329162/877753263271858187/1448580789695676500</a></p> <blockquote> <p>Yeah so can I get some help please</p> <p>Myself and some friends got together to make a post on the wiki for a new scp and it got flagged as ai and now I’m banned and genuinely I don’t understand I personally don’t mind ai but I genuinely understand why people myself included do not want ai generated scp content on the wiki but as my content has nothing to do with ai and was not used in any way I would like to understand what I did wrong</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>My friends don’t have usernames I’m the only one who posted it we collaborated outside of the wiki in real life and kinda just talked about it and I wrote it down as went went then Organized it all when I felt like it had enough sustenance</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>I’ve used apostrophes and question marks so by that logic you don’t have enough of an understanding of basic writing to be able to make that kind of judgement<br /> So are you gunna give me a real answer or just continue to bullshit me ?</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>So you’re going to accuse me of AI because I wrote it in the same way I write everything and because I tried to make it look like other articles I’ve read and format it the same way ?!?</p> <p>Sure I added shit that sounded right maybe I don’t have a full understanding of how it all works but to accuse me of using ai is ignorant and a big reach</p> <p>Especially to accuse my appeal to be ai generated because what ?? I space my paragraphs???</p> </blockquote> <p>After being informed of the decline:</p> <blockquote> <p>I feel bad for you dude I couldn’t imagine being so ignorant that i though anything that’s written properly or in a certain way is ai generated</p> <p>Its almost as if there is multiple forms of writing some being formal some being relaxed</p> <p>Come up with some real proof to back your claims because until then you are a certified bitch</p> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div> <p>Ban remains in place.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17478887#post-7467764</guid>
				<title>Re: AI Record - Ghostphyre</title>
				<link>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17478887/ai-record-ghostphyre#post-7467764</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 07:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Zyn</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1404533</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>User submitted appeal:</p> <blockquote> <p>I’ll be honest, I’m frustrated and confused. I read the site rules carefully, including the AI policy, and I did my best to stay within them. The SCP draft I posted was based on my own idea and discussions with friends, and I spent a lot of time writing and revising it so it would fit the tone and structure of a standard SCP article.</p> <p>Because of that, I don’t really understand what specifically made it look like AI-generated content to staff. From my perspective, it was just me trying very hard to write something that fit the site’s style: formal, technical, and consistent.</p> <p>If there are particular lines, sections, or patterns that triggered the AI suspicion, I’d really appreciate it if you could point them out. I want to understand what I did wrong so I can avoid repeating the same mistakes in the future and improve my writing to better match what the site expects from human authors.</p> <p>I respect the SCP Wiki’s rules and the need to protect the site from low-effort or AI-generated work. My intention was never to cause extra work for staff or to undermine those standards. If you’re willing to reconsider the ban, I’m happy to revise or completely rewrite the article from scratch under guidance.</p> <p>Thank you for taking the time to read this and for considering my appeal.</p> </blockquote> <p>Sent back:</p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">+&nbsp;show&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">–&nbsp;hide&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <hr /> <p>I will forward your appeal to staff for discussion. You will receive an update in 1-3 days.</p> <blockquote> <p>I spent a lot of time writing and revising it so it would fit the tone and structure of a standard SCP article.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>From my perspective, it was just me trying very hard to write something that fit the site’s style: formal, technical, and consistent.</p> <p>If there are particular lines, sections, or patterns that triggered the AI suspicion, I’d really appreciate it if you could point them out.</p> </blockquote> <p>The most obvious indicator was that the formatting of your submitted page follows patterns common to AI-generated pages, and not found in any of the templates available in the mainsite guides. Can you provide links to any official pages that you referenced when setting up your article the way it was presented?</p> <p>There are also a lot of specific phrases and wording quirks that are consistently present in AI-generated pages, compared to rarely, if ever, being seen in human-written works. Since SCP wiki staff have records of hundreds of cases of AI-generated pages, forum comments, and appeals, it is a simple matter of comparison for experienced readers to identify the common tells.</p> <hr /></div> </div> </div> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17478887#post-7455173</guid>
				<title>AI Record - Ghostphyre</title>
				<link>http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-17478887/ai-record-ghostphyre#post-7455173</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 07:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Zyn</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1404533</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Noting that new site member <span class="printuser avatarhover"><a href="http://www.wikidot.com/user:info/ghostphyre" ><img class="small" src="https://www.wikidot.com/avatar.php?userid=10161060&amp;amp;size=small&amp;amp;timestamp=1764920663" alt="Ghostphyre" style="background-image:url(https://www.wikidot.com/userkarma.php?u=10161060)" /></a><a href="http://www.wikidot.com/user:info/ghostphyre" >Ghostphyre</a></span> (account age 2 days, site membership 1 day) recently coldposted the following page, which has multiple obvious indicators of AI-generation: <a href="https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9207">https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9207</a></p> <p>Full page in creation, no edits.</p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">+&nbsp;show&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">–&nbsp;hide&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <div class="code"> <pre><code>Item #: SCP-9207 Object Class: Safe ⸻ Special Containment Procedures: SCP-9207 is currently considered a low-threat, self-regulating anomaly and is permitted to remain at large, provided its behavior continues to be limited to the distribution of beverages and short, non-violent interactions with live streamers. Foundation efforts are focused on monitoring and documentation rather than physical containment: 1. Foundation web-crawlers (Subroutine I/STREAM-04 “MODQUEUE”) are to monitor major live-broadcasting platforms (Twitch, Kick, YouTube Live, and regional equivalents) for appearances of SCP-9207 or behavior consistent with a Refreshment Event (see Description). Flagged streams are to be mirrored to Foundation servers for archival and analysis. 2. Mobile Task Force Eta-7 “Backseat Gamers” is tasked with light-field observation and liaison duties only. Direct capture operations have been suspended indefinitely. Personnel may engage SCP-9207 in a non-hostile manner if encountered but are not to impede its normal pattern of behavior unless there is clear evidence of deviation from previously observed activity. 3. Physical cans or bottles dispensed by SCP-9207 (SCP-9207-A) are to be collected for testing when this can be done without unduly disrupting civilian interactions or drawing attention to Foundation activity. Voluntary consumption by on-site Foundation personnel is permitted with prior written approval and follow-up medical/memetic screening. 4. Public awareness of SCP-9207 is to be informally redirected through the narrative of “viral marketing,” “paid actor,” or similar non-anomalous explanations. Mass amnestic treatment is considered unnecessary at this time; standard information control measures are sufficient so long as SCP-9207’s activities remain benign. Should SCP-9207’s behavior escalate beyond its current harmless parameters, reclassification and reinstatement of active containment protocols will be considered. ⸻ Description: SCP-9207 is an adult male humanoid of indeterminate ethnicity, consistently appearing between 1.65–1.75 m in height. Facial features and body proportions vary subtly between sightings; however, neural-pattern comparison of multiple high-resolution captures indicates a &gt;98% probability that all recorded manifestations represent a single ontological entity rather than multiple imitators. SCP-9207 habitually wears casual street clothing appropriate to local fashion, carries a small backpack or satchel, and is invariably in possession of at least one commercially branded can or bottle of Dr Pepper or a close regional analogue. No supply chain capable of sustaining its observed distribution has been identified. SCP-9207’s anomalous behavior is expressed during Refreshment Events, which follow a consistent pattern: 1. A live IRL (in-real-life) broadcast is in progress in a public space, with an average concurrent viewership ≥ 1,000. 2. The streamer verbally mentions any carbonated soft drink, the concepts of “thirst,” “heat,” or “long stream,” or directly references Dr Pepper (including mispronunciations or euphemisms) within microphone range. 3. Within 3–90 seconds, SCP-9207 enters the camera’s field of view from a direction that available footage indicates was previously unoccupied. This can occur even in isolated or geometrically closed environments with no apparent points of ingress. 4. SCP-9207 approaches the streamer silently, produces a chilled Dr Pepper beverage, and offers it with a slight bow or nod. If accepted, SCP-9207 will remain stationary until the streamer takes at least one sip, then depart the frame. If refused, SCP-9207 will instead place the beverage within frame (typically on a nearby flat surface) and depart. 5. After leaving the camera’s field of view, SCP-9207 cannot be located by mundane search, even when multiple viewers, drones, or GPS-tracking measures are employed. Attempts to pursue SCP-9207 beyond approximately 30 m from the point of interaction invariably fail due to momentary camera malfunctions, crowd obstructions, or spontaneous route confusion in the pursuer. Regardless of local weather conditions or prior handling, the beverage offered by SCP-9207 always exhibits a surface temperature between 1–3 °C and standard carbonation levels. Branding and packaging match legitimate, contemporary products in the region, but batch numbers and manufacturing codes are either invalid or correspond to facilities that have never produced that specific item. Ingesting the beverage (hereafter SCP-9207-A) induces a cluster of low-to-moderate anomalous effects in human subjects, collectively designated Event BUZZ: • Within 5–15 seconds: Subject reports a “perfect sip” sensation (subjective rating ≥9/10), regardless of stated pre-existing preferences for flavor or temperature. • Within 30–120 seconds: Subject’s on-stream performance measurably improves. Observed effects include faster reaction times, reduced verbal errors, higher win rates in interactive content, and increased viewer engagement metrics (+12–45% average concurrent viewers, +30–80% chat activity) lasting 45–90 minutes. • Throughout Event BUZZ: Occasional minor reality distortions occur, including spontaneous synchronization between in-game events and lyrics of background music, improbable streaks of good fortune, or chat messages forming coherent, predictive patterns about future stream content. These phenomena do not persist after the broadcast ends. • At event conclusion: Subject experiences mild fatigue, emotional “comedown,” and strong positive brand association with both Dr Pepper and SCP-9207. Long-term follow-up suggests a gradual shift in career trajectory toward full-time content creation and increased risk-taking behavior regarding IRL streaming. Repeated ingestion of SCP-9207-A (≥7 doses over 60 days) correlates with chronic insomnia, parasocial addiction to live metrics (viewer count, chat interaction), and recurring dreams featuring SCP-9207 standing just outside the bedroom door, silently offering a beverage. No direct harm has been recorded, but affected subjects exhibit elevated susceptibility to memetic and infohazardous stimuli delivered via chat overlays. Non-human animals show no anomalous response to SCP-9207-A. ⸻ Addendum 9207-1: Initial Containment Discovery SCP-9207 came to Foundation attention on ██/██/20██ after a compilation video titled “THE DR PEPPER GUY IS EVERYWHERE” reached the trending page on multiple platforms simultaneously. Foundation algorithms flagged the clip due to repeated instances of consistent humanoid appearance across five separate continents within a 72-hour window. Subsequent investigation confirmed at least 42 verifiable Refreshment Events predating the compilation by up to three years, most of them misattributed by the public to viral marketing or coordinated cosplay. The earliest confirmed occurrence (Event 9207-E-01) involves a low-viewership streamer in ███████, Texas, who received a beverage from an unidentified individual matching SCP-9207’s description while broadcasting from a near-empty parking lot at 03:12 local time. Security cameras from surrounding businesses do not show SCP-9207 entering or leaving the area, despite clear line-of-sight coverage. ⸻ Addendum 9207-3: Branding Anomaly On ██/██/20██, Foundation liaison teams contacted the Dr Pepper Snapple Group to investigate possible collaboration or knowledge of SCP-9207. Corporate records show no sanctioned campaign matching SCP-9207’s behavior, and all referenced batch numbers associated with SCP-9207-A either do not exist or correspond to product lines discontinued decades earlier. However, following the classified briefing, worldwide sales of Dr Pepper inexplicably increased by 7% over the next quarter, with the most significant growth segment traced to demographics overlapping heavily with live-stream audiences. Market analysis firms uniformly attribute this to “organic meme spread,” despite Foundation information-control efforts. Internal debate is ongoing as to whether SCP-9207 is: • A spontaneous memetic avatar generated by aggregated viewer attention, • A parasitic infohazard utilizing a pre-existing brand as camouflage, or • An autonomous marketing egregore that has outlived (or outgrown) its original creator. Proposal to reclassify SCP-9207 to Thaumiel for potential use in controlled morale-boosting operations among long-term containment staff remains under review but is currently considered unnecessary.</code></pre></div> </div> </div> </div> <p>Excerpts of note:</p> <blockquote> <p>Item #: SCP-9207<br /> Object Class: Safe</p> <p>⸻</p> <p>Special Containment Procedures:</p> <p>SCP-9207 is currently considered a low-threat, self-regulating anomaly and is permitted to remain at large, provided its behavior continues to be limited to the distribution of beverages and short, non-violent interactions with live streamers.</p> <p>Foundation efforts are focused on monitoring and documentation rather than physical containment:<br /> 1. Foundation web-crawlers (Subroutine I/STREAM-04 “MODQUEUE”) are to monitor major live-broadcasting platforms (Twitch, Kick, YouTube Live, and regional equivalents) for appearances of SCP-9207 or behavior consistent with a Refreshment Event (see Description). Flagged streams are to be mirrored to Foundation servers for archival and analysis.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>SCP-9207’s anomalous behavior is expressed during Refreshment Events, which follow a consistent pattern:<br /> 1. A live IRL (in-real-life) broadcast is in progress in a public space, with an average concurrent viewership ≥ 1,000.<br /> 2. The streamer verbally mentions any carbonated soft drink, the concepts of “thirst,” “heat,” or “long stream,” or directly references Dr Pepper (including mispronunciations or euphemisms) within microphone range.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>⸻</p> <p>Addendum 9207-3: Branding Anomaly</p> <p>On ██/██/20██, Foundation liaison teams contacted the Dr Pepper Snapple Group to investigate possible collaboration or knowledge of SCP-9207. Corporate records show no sanctioned campaign matching SCP-9207’s behavior, and all referenced batch numbers associated with SCP-9207-A either do not exist or correspond to product lines discontinued decades earlier.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>Internal debate is ongoing as to whether SCP-9207 is:<br /> • A spontaneous memetic avatar generated by aggregated viewer attention,<br /> • A parasitic infohazard utilizing a pre-existing brand as camouflage, or<br /> • An autonomous marketing egregore that has outlived (or outgrown) its original creator.</p> <p>Proposal to reclassify SCP-9207 to Thaumiel for potential use in controlled morale-boosting operations among long-term containment staff remains under review but is currently considered unnecessary.</p> </blockquote> <p>Permanently banned, PM sent. Kufat supporting.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>