WatcherKatrielle

Sandbox: [link removed]

What to Critique: SPaG, Story Development and Realism.

Wordcount: 1433 Words (7,373 Charcters)

Greenlights: (footnote: Yes, I know this isn't related to this Draft but I want this critiqued while I finish the SCP Draft which I am currently working on.) https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16890081/sg-spaceship-with-medieval-architecture

The point of issue being that they knowingly requested draft critique on (noticeably very error-heavy) material that was not greenlighted, and instead posted a link to an unrelated concept they did have greenlighted.

They asked me for feedback:

Hello Zyn. I am a first-time author on the SCP Wiki. I am asking you to critique this draft due to your strength in emotional articles.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16903891/scp-4999-tale

I didn't read the thread carefully and replied noting that I could provide a surface-level review as I wasn't familiar with the context of the material, and the user responded:

Yes, I am certainly ok with critique with someone who doesn't know the anomaly that well. In my eyes, critique is critique. Here is the forum link for your convenience.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16903891/scp-4999-tale

I have posted a staff notice about the broken guidelines and locked the thread. Forum-goers, heads up.