Furthermore, it was noticed:

• "looking at reds sandbox history, their entire article was basically written immediately and has minimal edit history"
• "Just one instance of the weird conclusion with arbitrary adjectives and adverbs is typically a smoking gun. This one article has no less than 25 instances of those. Not to mention the sandbox history plainly stating that the entire article was written in one sitting and the other sandbox just having "GPT" just slapped right in the middle of it."
• "Drlavalava saying [in the discussion thread]: "I have witnessed his writing process with my of eyes and saw him perform revisions according to my feedback." is incredibly suspicious simply because of the fact the entire article did not change from Revision 0."
• "Just to be extra, super duper sure, I also plugged the posted article and the final sandbox revision into a text compare. The only differences between posted and final sandbox is that the sandbox uses SCP-8091 while the posted used SCP-8096."
• "The only differences between Final Sandbox and Initial Sandbox is a reformatting of the collapsible titles. Which means that the only difference between the Posted Article and the Initial Sandbox is the SCP designation and the titles of the collapsibles, which means that Drlavalava can only be lying."

The reds3232 account has been revoked, pending a ban. PM sent and thread moved to Disc.

Disc team, please weigh in with regards to ban. Personally I am recommending a month for both users involved.

reds3232

Page source is saved and is available to staff.

Disc Team, please weigh in.