Action: 19 Unlisting, 19 Deletion

Staff AO3 Account: 0 Yes, 38 No

There will be no Staff AO3 account. Due to the tie, administrators will determine what action we will be taking regarding the Project Crossover articles.

I was swayed by ais and Estrella, who reasoned that Unlisting gives the appearance of a functional deletion for all members of the public. This option comfortably occupies the intersection between purging non-CC and preserving metadata.

Unlisting seems to remove the problem without permanently losing the record. If ti ever became apparent at a later date that it must be deleted, then we delete then.

Mostly in favor of unlisting in case an author wants a copy of the page at a later date, realise there are other backups but this seems like the simplest option.

Reasoning: Based on the policies of e.g. Wikipedia, unlisting should be sufficient. It would preserve information that would otherwise be lost.

Reasoning: All downside, no upside. If a non-staffer wants to post this material to AO3 or elsewhere, let it be their problem. (Although it would become our problem if they violate our license, in addition to whatever issues would be caused by the incorporation of other copyrighted works.)

Everyone has universally agreed that the options are Unlisting and Deletion, and no third option has been given.

However, a lot of people have brought up the concept of porting stuff over on a staff AO3 account, enough that I feel not giving it its own vote would be ignoring people's voices.

As such, we will be voting on two things. Given that this will include two votes, I've elected to extend the voting period to two weeks.

In the event of a tie in either vote, SCP Wiki administrators will decide which option to pick.

|| Vote || Unlisting || Deletion || || Action || || || || Vote || Yes || No || || Staff AO3 Account || || ||