Disciplinary - Jim2132

Re: Disciplinary - Jim2132

Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:01:17 +0000

I don't see any reason not to take an appeal for this case.

Re: Disciplinary - Jim2132

Sun, 07 Feb 2021 21:48:34 +0000

They sent me a Wikidot PM with the following;

My membership was removed for no reason i got no warning.I did not brake any of the rules.If you could help me with finding out why it was i would appreciate that.Thank you for your time.

I'm sending a reply explaining and linking the thread. I presume an appeal remains open?

Re: Disciplinary - Jim2132

Sun, 07 Feb 2021 20:33:07 +0000

Bumping this up to disciplinary and noting that per chat records, this is the same individual as Aiden6477 (account now deleted) who was given an age ban for repeatedly submitting applications with different ages, and behavior in PMs indicative of them not meeting the age limit to join the site (behavior which is consistent with the Jim account).

Permabanned for sockpuppeting and ban evasion.

ETA: logs

+ show block

Disciplinary - Jim2132

Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:47:11 +0000

User Jim2132 (W: 1d | S: 1d) has so far:

Posted an ideas thread summarising the idea in a single sentence without the format: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-13993912/idea
Posted a partial SCP draft in the ideas forum: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-13994544/my-scp-idea-draft
Provided poor quality critique on multiple occasions: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-13993564/the-children-of-the-frozen-queen:the-ones-who-will-end-the-w#post-4890165 and http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-13994547/fortune-worm#post-4890826

Whilst not rule breaking to post a bad article to the site, they also posted the following as a tale:

[+]full text of the work, titled 'are we right?'

It is my opinion that the pattern of behaviour expressed throughout these actions is highly indicative of the user being too young to use the site; and would call for disciplinary action to be taken as a result despite the relatively few infractions present so far.