http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1412509/scp-2186#post-2393203

As serious as it is (or was meant to be), this was clearly coldposted. "[user name]" clearly just has no consideration for feelings…or rules, I guess.

I closed-staff-posted telling them to let staff handle rulebreakers. At this point, 24 hour ban. I'm going to get that taken care of right now since it's effectively three days late.

I actually dislike 24 hour bans. I'll accept it if that's the consensus, but I'd personally prefer a week-long.

Voting for a ban either way.

New user UnknownASA does not match any existing user name recently made a lot of substantial edits to a coldpost: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2912

including edit comments "Massive revision of the SCP.", "Fixed the interview (slightly).", and "More changes. You're welcome. It looked like a total wreck before I came here. Many grammatical, punctuation and format errors. The information does not form a report and resembles fantasy at most."

They also commented the following in the discussion page:

I have done some extreme revisions to the article. Hope you like it.

(in response to someone's critique of the page)

After looking at this thing, I just had to fix some errors. Some of the listed, however, are not yet done. Maybe I'll get back to this page I'll fix whatever mistakes the author made.

Modposted twice noting Site Rules, keep an eye on.

This thing is bare. Truly, if you gave me this article as an actual report on actual anomalous objects, I would slap you and turn you into a D-Class severely reprimand you and suggest you get demoted.

Procyon close staff-posted here:

UnknownASA, you've been told to stop making this kind of shitpost before. So stop making this kind of shitpost.

More questionable posts:

Keep an eye on. They're possibly on the farther younger end of the spectrum, given that they've got two threads in General Advice asking about Data expunged/redacted and also what a transcript is.

(I accidentally posted this in the wrong place and I couldn't delete it. So I improvised this.)

Please, just don't make everything Echomax in your next SCP. I don't want to see something like this:

+ Level 20 Million Plus Clearance Required

- Access Granted: SCP- Echomax

Item #: SCP-Echomax

Object Class: Echomax Max

Special Containment Procedures: Put the thing in the Echomax Box.

Description: SCP-Echomax is a Echomax made of an Echomax alloy, composed of echomanium and echoluminum.

Addendum: It was found in the Echomax Apartment of Mr. Jerry Echomax Echomax, student of the Echomax University.

Interview Echomax-AD-495
> Interviewed: Echomax
>
> Interviewer: Dr. Echomax
>
> Foreword: Dr. Echomax attempts to inverview Echomax regarding Incident Echomax-D-193
>
> <Begin Log, Date E/CH/OMAX>
>
> Dr. Echomax: Echomax, Echomax Echomax Echomax Echomax Echomax?
>
> Echomax: Echomax. Echomax Echomax Echomax Echomax Echomax.
>
> Dr. Echomax: Echomaxxxxx.
>
> <End Log, Date E/CH/OMAX>
>
> Closing Statement: Echomax ultimately complied with the inverview and revealed "Echomax Echomax Echomax Echomax Echomax". Echomax was eventually escorted to it's cell by team ECHOMAX-ROMEO-294

Footnotes

1.Echomax is to be Echomaxed immediately

Obviously it's extremely over-exaggerated and the footnotes aren't that good, but hey, I did that in 10 minutes. Don't blame me. I had to improvise for the footnotes due to the codes not working the way I thought it should have. Anyways, not an aggressive jab at the author. It would just make me cry to see the above collapsible happen.

Closed staff post warning for shitposting, sent a PM with the same content.