Non-Disc Record - prgamer

Re: prgamer

Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:36:41 +0000

Ban on next shitpost.

Re: prgamer

Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:26:13 +0000

They are apparently aware of the staff warning, since they edited out the following post:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1063457/the-darkshroud-device#post-2178134

I suggest not "darkening" anything in the containment procedures at all, and if you fix that, it is good to go in my opinion, but I suggest waiting for more better writers to come and look

They changed it to "deleted". The original post was made about two minutes after the one Kalinin called him out on.

Supporting 24 hour ban for next infraction.

Re: prgamer

Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:20:08 +0000

Also of note is that apparently they're a high-functioning autistic individual. This isn't an excuse, of course, but it does possibly explain some of the not-quite-getting-it-ness.

In any case, I support a 24-hour next time.

Edit: derpbear has spoken

Re: prgamer

Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:51:39 +0000

I agree, they're clearly not getting the message.

Re: prgamer

Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:57:34 +0000

Supporting 24.

Re: prgamer

Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:35:04 +0000

Issued an official warning in this thread after prgamer once again jumped in and said "you're good to go" on a draft that is nowhere close to mainlist ready.

It's also worth noting that Esko had to warn this dude about repeatedly bumping his threads earlier this morning.

I would ordinarily call for revocation at this point, however this is beyond "flailing in ignorance" and is now into "ignoring repeated instructions by staff." Given the amount of attention this user is requiring, moving for a 24 hour ban for the inevitable next offense.

Re: prgamer

Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:01:43 +0000

Also repeatedly posted new threads for updated drafts. Locked one before (and pointed out they don't need to do that), user posted this thread just now. I once again locked and pointed to the existing thread, plus a warning to not do that again.

prgamer

Fri, 12 Dec 2014 02:56:38 +0000

User prgamer recently posted the following feedback on a draft (that needed a lot of work):

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1063165/an-invisible-snake#post-2177610

You're good to go.

Kalinin staffposted and wrote a line-by-line, bless him. I took the staffpost further and told prgamer to stop giving feedback until he had a successful piece on the site, given that he's been called out by staff before.

Another instance is here: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-783406/the-jigsaw-man#post-1980760

Good, but you need to work with spelling errors and formatting in the end. Good, but still needs work with spelling and formatting. You can find formatting help in the how to write a SPC guide in this website.

Given that they haven't figured out how to use the forum "reply" button and they've demonstrated not understanding other aspects of the site, I'm assuming they're just not familiar with the general community and etiquette. (Also, I feel that it merits mentioning that they made a thread asking if anyone on the site had autism, since they were diagnosed with high-functioning autism.)

Keep an eye on them. Official warning if they keep giving bad feedback.