Disciplinary - Euan Mcgregor/thatfedoradude

Re: Euan Mcgregor/thatfedoradude

Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:25:38 +0000

yup that is exactly what I got from this

Re: Euan Mcgregor/thatfedoradude

Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:57:04 +0000

That really screams "I'm mature enough to be here and it would be reasonable to maybe possibly consider giving me another chance in a year." Don't you think so?

Re: Euan Mcgregor/thatfedoradude

Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:17:26 +0000

Classy.

Re: Euan Mcgregor/thatfedoradude

Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:14:15 +0000

Got a reply:

Euan McGregor
To: thedeadlymoose
Re: SCP Foundation Ban
9 Nov 2014, 12:50

I'd like to perma on grounds of your mom

Re: Euan Mcgregor/thatfedoradude

Fri, 07 Nov 2014 01:20:52 +0000

Enough votes for a permaban, and no votes against. He has a current application, too: "I want to re-join so I can let other people know about my ideas"

I'll deny the app and take care of the ban.

EDIT: Done, and message sent.

Re: Euan Mcgregor/thatfedoradude

Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:09:41 +0000

Mainly chat, but this also touches on wiki matters, so it's time for a CROSSPOST.

Re: Euan Mcgregor/thatfedoradude

Wed, 05 Nov 2014 18:56:06 +0000

This guy should be gone. As a Mod I'd like a perma.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Wed, 05 Nov 2014 01:17:35 +0000

Let's Perma.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:51:39 +0000

Just in case you folks aren't aware, this guy was already banned from the subreddit for being generally shitty and posting an entire message that consisted largely of "FCK U" over and over again. We've removed some of his posts, so let me, bluesoul, or Kens know if you'd like to see some of the evidence on the reddit.

He's "thatfedoradude" on the reddit.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:22:19 +0000

Nope, perma.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:15:57 +0000

This is extremely funny. Also, voting for perma on grounds of trolling. (Obviously, with chat, it's a done deal.)

EDIT: I'm aware most of the offenses happened on chat or offsite, and am voting for perma on the wiki anyway due to immense amount of trolling. However, I totally understand if other admins (and disciplinary team members) vote against perma on the wiki, since the grounds are admittedly ambiguous.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:14:15 +0000

If you're volunteering, hell yes! I don't have time at the moment to make on from scratch, but I would sure as hell contribute.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:03:28 +0000

With the chat stuff and the Reddit context added, I have to say I'd be happy with a perma.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:44:11 +0000

You'd think that a person with an IQ of FRICKING ONE-HUNDRED AND FOURTY would know how to properly delete a page.

Anyway, adding my support to revocation and a 24 independent of anything on chat.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:34:18 +0000

Xposting for chat stuff:
Here!
Confirmed for thatfedoraguy on sandbox.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:35:42 +0000

Want me to write a basic guide and shop it around for tidbits like this?

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:26:56 +0000

We really need a Staff Guide for all this minutiae… ._.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:08:51 +0000

First time advocating revocation, will remember in the future.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 07:19:23 +0000

Revoked. As a side note, though, I noticed Crayne had not flagged them as abusive. Guys, when you want someone revoked or banned, always flag them. The flag will not work if it's not via a post or action taken on the SCP wiki itself.

(I flagged them from their edit to Series 3, which is fortunate; if they hadn't edited that list I'd have had to wade through hundreds and hundreds of names to find them.)

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 07:03:22 +0000

Feed thyself, moose.

I say revoke. That should get the message through, since it seems like they're not noticing PMs or forum comments.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Tue, 04 Nov 2014 00:54:46 +0000

Same. Since it's not an emergency, gonna wait for another admin/disciplinary moderator vote (also because I badly need to go eat)

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:17:16 +0000

I can get behind revocation.

Re: Euan Mcgregor

Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:44:33 +0000

Sure, revoke.

Euan Mcgregor

Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:21:13 +0000

NOTICE:

This log details acts by a repeat offender under multiple accounts. Do not add future transgressions to this log. The consolidated version of this individual's disciplinary log can be found here. If you suspect this individual of any future action on the chat or wiki, please document it on that thread. Thank you for your cooperation.

User (account deleted) coldposted SCP-2406 (under another page name, but I renamed). Then, after a few downvotes, blanked that page and reposted ad verbatim in the SCP-2986 slot. I deleted the latter and reverted the former. Also sent a PM informing them that this is against site rules and asked them not to repeat the behavior.

Edit: user now deleted SCP-2406 and re-reposted in SCP-2986 slot. Advocating deletion of article and revocation for absolute and total cluelessness. Also, the underage is strong with this one.

Edit 2: And now SCP-2986's been self-deleted again. Still recommending revocation.