AnomalousMuffin2

Phoenixskies01

The application has been declined and the new account has been PMed.

PianoYarn8765

20 Mar 2026, 09:33 https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17638152/scp-9082#post-7652847

the page is now at -11 rating, it would be deleted soon

20 Mar 2026, 14:08 https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17638152/scp-9082#post-7653068 reply to closed staff post, "Please don't leave spammy comments like this."

When the staff deleted my page, it was at -11 rating

20 Mar 2026, 15:13 https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17638152/scp-9082#post-7653098 reply to author post

could you delete the page and paste it on another page that hasn't been created yet, my daft is mainly focused on SCP-9082?

edited to:

could you delete the page and paste it on another page that hasn't been created yet, like SCP-9108, as my daft is mainly focused on SCP-9082?

Of note, the user also posted two of the same thread:

• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17632082/dangerous-scps-housed-at-site-19-that-arent-from-series-one
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17632987/dangerous-scps-housed-at-site-19-that-aren-t-from-series-one

I moved the post that was in the wrong forum and locked it. User then sent this PM:

subject line "Could You Unlock My Thread?"

The thread you locked was before the other thread I posted, it was two hours before the second thread

I replied asking if there was a pressing reason to unlock one thread over the other as neither had a reader response yet, and if one was unlocked then the other would be locked, as repeat threads/spam are not permitted on the site.

Researcher Gublenal

Disclaimer

This page will (eventually) (probably) be the main page for a tale/SCP 001 proposal, but I'm not confident enough in my writing to actually put that in the mainstream. Therefore, I'm putting it off to the side, where it hopefully won't be noticed by people who really care about page quality, because

I'm trying my best, ok?

Here are the main SCP's, although SCP FE-002 is actually the one to start with

SCP FE-001 Twelve Roman Standards
SCP FE-002 On A Frictionless Plane
[…]

When addressed by readers about the site rules, the user responded:

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17613898/operation-five-eagles#post-7610043 reply to comment "I don't think you're permitted to reserve pages."

Fine whatever, but what i meant is "Please don't add to this seireis when I actually already have a plan.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17613898/operation-five-eagles#post-7610050 reply to comment "I know what it means to reserve a page. I'm saying you can't do it."

Fine. I removed it, but i still plan to write those things. It's my story.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17613898/operation-five-eagles#post-7610055 reply to comment "You can plan to do whatever you like, write whatever you want, but this is patently not the place to make pages like this. Use the sandbox, that's what it's for, and you won't have to leave passive aggressive footnotes to voters."

The problem there is I can't like link the pages together, and they tend to kinda sorta disappear, making it hard to make progress.

It's also just like, I'd rather not spend more time on the refrence page than the actual 13 or so SCP's and stories.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17613898/operation-five-eagles#post-7610065 reply to comment "The mainsite is for finished works, not theoretical works-in-progress. If you want to draft something, you should do it on the SCP Sandbox. Edited to reply: Again, you're not allowed to reserve pages by linking them in advance. Pay attention to the advice you're being given, instead of getting defensive."

This part of the work is finished, in that it's a functional mainpage that collects a bunch of other pages I am in the process of writing. Yes, I know graphic design is not my calling. What other wisdom do you have?

NyxOneiros

Nyx_Oneiros

The old account has been issued a ban. The user, as of now, has rejoined with the new account.

TheEssophysicKitt

KittInTheDesert

The old account has been issued a ban. The user may now join with the current account.

• NuggetKing1000, account created 3 Mar 2026, 23:54
• NuggetKing1000-2, account created 4 Mar 2026, 03:23

Both accounts have had their applications denied. PM sent informing them that a user may only join with one account.

Dr Murd

DogeFan889

well ok this is a head's up then, new account is DogeFan889, Old was Dr Murd, I haven't posted any articles other than some minor contribs editing so nothing needs to be preserved. Thanks for your diligence

Prior account was removed and issued a ban; user may now apply to join the site with the new account.

Anasguard-site127

Message:
Dear SCP Wiki Team,

I am formally requesting the inclusion of Site-127 in the Foundation Facilities page on SCP Wiki. The site is fully prepared and aligned with the SCP universe standards, and adding it to the facilities list will allow the community to explore and reference it appropriately.

Thank you very much for your attention and consideration. I look forward to your positive response.

Best regards,
Anasguard-Site127

I sent back:

Of note, staff does have a declined application from this user on file, from 05/04/25:

I want to help the community and suggest a new site (Site-127).

User is a member of the sandbox site, but has no edit history.

Chollerman

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17573189/the-eternal-contradiction#post-7524336

Okay, definitely okay, this is a really idea, but it really need work, can you please create a sandbox and link it to your forum, this idea is kind of meh and okay but can you review it, not talking bad of your idea but, this is AI-generated text? just need review

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17565338/seeking-greenlights-crystals-to-anywhere#post-7524304

This is really interesting for you seek the greenlight to this idea…

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572261/tempural-anomalies-department-seeking-greenlight#post-7524303

Okay, i know im not a reviewer, but with this description, i can say that this can be really a joke entry/joke goi, but with a reviewing, greenlights can accept your idea, not saying if they will accept or reject

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572774/seeking-greenlight-concrete-circle#post-7524301

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572774/seeking-greenlight-concrete-circle#post-7524301

Of note, all of the rest of their forum posts also have some form of broken guideline/questionable content:

• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572102/scp-9855-the-ball-who-magnetize-ecology draft thread without greenlights, "I think i need for someone rating +5, i passed 3 hours editing this page, feedbacks! 🕵️‍♂️👨‍💻"
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3199/comments/show#post-7522831 uncollapsed image, "the thing on the middle of its legs are a pennis?"
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17573544/seeking-greenlight-scp-9855-the-ball-who-magnetize-ecology concept critique thread with sandbox link

Given that staff have needed to address every post this user has submitted, recommending revoke on next infraction.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572768/scp-9121#post-7522983 (response to comment, "D-8693 continues to suffer in agony, “Please kill me!” D-8693 says as they plea for suicide. For me, this single sentence ruined everything else this article had going for it. -1.")

You are softer than a wet sponge if you found this disturbing.

If this type of content (which, mind you, was included in the content warning), makes you feel disturbed, then first of all, the article did its job in making you feel something. Second, the SCP Foundation is a dark and mysterious place, containing horrid creatures and events. Therefore, the passage which you have included is to be expected.

Your reasoning makes no sense and you are an idiot.

The user also posted a comment on another author's page: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572710/scp-9139#post-7522987 post title "Absurd"

So this SCP succeeds, but SCP-9121 does not?

What an awful, subhuman community. It has degenerated into nothingness.

User deleted their account before staff enacted any disciplinary measures.

Lemarco111

Post title "Look at the drafts please!"

You should look if the SCP you used is a work in progress, I have started one took a break over the weekend and come back to see a full entry (no hate tho) just next time try to look at the draft maybe someone is already working on an SCP, I need to create a new one but still it’s alr next time LOOK AT THE DRAFT

User's comment was replaced with a staff notice; Kufat admin posted. Of note, user is not a sandbox site member.

Blorckits

This was the worst Scp article I've read in 4 years. All that fluff for nothing at all. Nothing happens, nothing the story sets up is answered, none of the dialogue is good and is so obviously just the author screaming their own beliefs in your face, Agent red is extremely obnoxious while meant to be likable and the self insert for the author, extremely long with no substance at all. Thanks for wasting my time with this bullshit.

edited to:

This was the worst Scp article I've read in 4 years. All that fluff for nothing at all. Nothing happens, nothing the story sets up is answered, none of the dialogue is good and is so obviously just the author screaming their own beliefs in your face, Agent red is extremely obnoxious while meant to be likable and the self insert for the author, and on top of all of that the story is unnecessarily long with ZERO substance at all. Thanks for wasting my time with this bullshit.

edited again to:

This was the worst Scp article I've read in 4 years. All that fluff for nothing at all. Nothing happens, nothing the story sets up is answered, none of the dialogue is good and is so obviously just the author screaming their own beliefs in your face, Agent red is extremely obnoxious while meant to be likable and the self insert for the author, and on top of all of that the story is unnecessarily long with ZERO substance at all.

I was very intrigued by the concept and really tried to like this one, but it just had nothing going for it. It felt like this was written while high as shit. Thanks for wasting my time with this terrible article.

I've staffposted the comment. Recommending revoke on next infraction, or potentially ban if the repeated behavior is egregious.

Sparce Crow

Description : SCP-9108 takes on the form of a lamp, originally found inside of the attic of ████████ in ██████, Oregon. After a burning smell was reported by nearby residents, the fire department responded. After the investigation was reported to the public, the SCP foundation was notified by Sergeant █████, a high ranking member of the Mobile Task Force branch, Epsilon-11. As of current, the lamp has been narrowed down to originate from the Middle East or Africa, and constructed in the late 19th century.

User then posted the comments:

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17491269/scp-9108-the-lamp#post-7471616

After posting this, I’m realizing that this could use a few more days in the oven. I’m planning on having the finalized draft by Dec 31st, and then I’m moving on. If anyone wants to point out some errors they think are important or holding the article back, please let me know so I can finish.

When asked to seek critique before posting: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17491269/scp-9108-the-lamp#post-7473607

Yes, I am posted in the Idea Critique in the Discord. The idea is for the final draft to be ready and published by new years. My plan is to post a new article every month on the 15th, and edit it for the rest of that month

Author did not respond to reviewer reply, which included the question "Why not instead just upload articles you're confident in when they're ready, rather than to an arbitrary timeline?".

User has no sandbox page and no forum comments beyond the coldpost page.

Epirus

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17491417/is-this-good-enough#post-7471335

I'm not a critic, nor am I staff, but I'd recommend you follow format.
Aside from that, it seems solid to me. But, as I said, I'm not a critic. I'd wait until two proper critics come over and double-green you, then you can work on the draft, and after that, you can push.

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17493767/seeking-for-greenlight-mycobacterium-coli#post-7473547

Not to burst your bubble- but you should probably follow format + shorten that description a bit. I don't think the mods will be all too happy.

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17493919/seeking-greenlights:scp-9203-lamplight-shadower#post-7473576

The, uh, the description might be a tad long for the mods to tolerate, might wanna cut that down.

I've staffposted on all of the above.

CLP Franco Wikidot.com User since: 8 Dec 2025, 21:32 (1 day ago)

LCLP Franco Wikidot.com User since: 8 Dec 2025, 10:53 (1 day ago)

Both applications were declined, as neither met criteria:

This authorization is limited to the removal of infringing content via section 512 of the DMCA, regional equivalents, or legal action. This authorization is via Informal Contract agreement, and is an

text

PMs have been sent noting that only one account may join the mainsite and the other will be issued a ban.

JustMave Wikidot.com User since: 7 Dec 2025, 06:02 (17 hours ago)

Mavelos Wikidot.com User since: 7 Dec 2025, 07:07 (16 hours ago)

Of note, the second account has a sandbox that matches the username of the first account: http://scpsandboxit.wikidot.com/justmave title "JUSTMAVE_SCP-xxx-It – Florimortus Acediae (Fiore della Morte dell’Acedia)" (which incidentally also looks to be AI-generated) as well as a forum post that introduces themselves with the other account's name: http://fondazionescp.wikidot.com/forum/t-17482921/ciao-mi-presento-justmave#post-7459708

Ciao, sono JustMave.
È da un po’ che volevo entrare nella community degli SCP e finalmente sono qui.
Da circa due settimane sto lavorando alla storia per un mio SCP ispirato a un fiore.
Mi ha richiesto parecchio tempo, soprattutto perché ci tenevo a renderlo credibile: ho fatto ricerche, letto materiale e approfondito un po’ di botanica per costruire una base scientifica solida.
È stato impegnativo, ma anche super interessante da sviluppare.

As such, both accounts have had their applications declined. PMs have been sent noting that only one account may join the mainsite and the other will be issued a ban.

Doctor Infraviolet

Five edits in all, including edit comments "Fixed the format, added some liveliness to the characters, fixed some grammatical errors. -I.V." and "Added SCP-9022 hyperlink." Of note, none of the edits included adding a rating module.

Comparisons:

Addendum 9179-A — Testing Notes

•2009 Ford Transit Before: Bullet damage, empty tank After: Fully restored, paint retouched
•Foundation ATV Before: Broken axle, mud-logged engine After: Restored + optional nitrous kit generated without request
•Bicycle Before: Rusted, bent spokes After: Fully replaced with new frame + fresh chain
•██-Series Tactical Truck Before: Engine destroyed in SCP-███ incident After: Fully rebuilt, new engine block installed within 5 seconds

Addendum 9179-A: Testing Notes

Item	Before	After
2009 Ford Transit	Bullet damage, empty tank	Fully restored, paint retouched
Foundation ATV	Broken axle, mud-logged engine	Restored + optional nitrous kit generated without request
Bicycle	Rusted, bent spokes	Fully replaced with new frame + fresh chain
██-Series Tactical Truck	Engine destroyed in SCP-███ incident	Fully rebuilt, new engine block installed within 5 seconds

Agent Colburn: …Is that a wide body kit?

Dr. Harlan: AND A TURBOCHARGER.
Look at this beauty. Clean paint, polished chrome… my god. It even fixed the cup holder.

Agent Colburn: You didn’t request any upgrades, did you?

Dr. Harlan: I might have been thinking about it. Internally. Quietly. Maybe.

Agent Colburn: …Is that a wide body kit?

Dr. Harlan: And a turbocharger. Look at this beauty. Clean paint, polished chrome… My god. It even fixed the cup holder.

Agent Colburn: You didn’t request any upgrades, did you?

Dr. Harlan: I might have been thinking about it. Internally… quietly… maybe.

The chase ended after Harlan collided with a pallet of containment-grade steel bars, resulting in minimal injury but significant bruising to his dignity. FLK-3 was driven back into SCP-9179 and restored to original factory condition — including removal of neon underglow against Harlan’s protests.

Disciplinary Action: Dr. Harlan is no longer authorized to be in SCP 9179's containment chamber. He has also been demoted, Dr. Harlan is now only authorized to Class 2 and lower.

The chase ended after Harlan collided with a pallet of containment-grade steel bars, resulting in minimal injury, but significant bruising to his dignity. FLK-3 was driven back into SCP-9179 and restored to original factory condition, including removal of neon underglow against Harlan’s protests.

Disciplinary Action: Dr. Harlan is no longer authorized to be in SCP-9179's containment chamber, as he has been demoted to Level 2 clearance.

Edits were reverted, staff post added to discussion thread.

Anonymous0417

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/doctorryo/comments/show#post-7436705 post title "Good"

Nice story! I’d say it needs more sex scenes.

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9103/comments/show#post-7436703 post title "What."

Ah yes, removing a statue that is wearing a haz-mat suit. Seems right.

as well as some general spam:

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-6833/comments/show#post-7434922 post title "+1"

pee pee man

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-16956195/7416-aldi#post-7434378

More

DrIbarazaki

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17443421/seeking-greenlight-scp-9709-the-war-stained-grenade#post-7421152

Author, as per the greenlighting policy first-time authors seeking draft critique in the forums must first at least two greenlights from the Ideas Critique forum here, the IRC chatrooms, and/or the official Discord server.

Please first go to the Ideas forum or the chat, give a quick summary (for the Ideas forum, please follow the instructions in the required reading thread) of the concept you want to write up (don't link the draft unless someone requests it).

During the conceptualization stage, reviewers can let you know if something similar already exists on the site, and/or tell you if there is anything that would prevent them from wanting to read a full draft. These issues are more effectively addressed earlier on in the writing process.

If you have already received two greenlights, please note from whom and where you received them. If you would like to skip the greenlighting process, you can use the IRC chatrooms for draft reviews.

(Thank you to Zyn for the base of this message.)

This is not the first time they have been addressed for backseat modding, as staff records of sporadic cases include:

• 24 January 2025: was using copy-pasta to backseat mod Licensing team directions for images/license box
• 7 February 2025: told a user "Series 9 is closed too Series 6, 7, and 8 are the ones that have actual open slots. Mostly 7 and 8 though" when series 9 was the current open series, series 6 had no open slots, and series 7 had one open slot
• 26 February 2025: staff member noted, [They're currently extremely overzealous and openly posted in help desk the other day that they got a sense of joy out of identifying AI articles and reporting them, which to me is a bit of a red flag]
• 23 March 2025: added a staff-only tag to someone's page
• 31 March 2025: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17085315/seeking-greenlight-the-suspected-origin-of-the-a-s-c-f#post-6905735 "Quill says no AI usage was detected, so"

I've admin posted on the forum post and sent them a PM asking them to refrain from further such posts.

Naglesquish

[[module rate]] [[include :scp-wiki:component:anomaly-class-bar-source |item-number=8518 |clearance=6 |container-class=keter |secondary-class=none |disruption-class=amida |risk-class=danger ]] **Special Containment Procedures:** SCP-8518 is to be locked in a 5m x 5m x 5m heat proof chamber lined with glass and heat shields. SCP-8518 is safely contained (for now), however, personnel should maintain 1 meter distance from the containment chamber. **Description:** SCP-8417 is a cosmic entity with no variable size or volume. Its appearance appears to be an eye surrounded by cosmic particles protecting the inner form. SCP-8518 does extensive damage to the minds of subjects and personnel. SCP-8518 has 5 different abilities, all used at different times. A-1: Mind Manipulation A-2: Control of Emotions A-3: Aggressiveness Infliction A-4: Brain Damage A-5: Cosmic Manipulation **Surface Abilities (A-1 to A-5):** * **A-1: "Mind Manipulation”** Manipulates subjects minds to lure sed subject to open containment chamber. Usually causes long-term mind damage with no perceivable cure. * **A-2: "Control of Emotions"** Controls subjects emotions, randomly switching trough harsh and gentle emotions, subject reported to have zero recollection of SCP-8518 after control. * **A-3: "Aggressiveness Infliction "** Gifts subjects enhanced strength, but subjects become aggressive and angry, destroying everything around them. * **A-4: " Brain damage"** Gives subjects extensive neurological damage. Damage is usually permanent and gives subjects various conditions such as ADHD, PTSD, OCD etc. [[footnote]]Following multiple incidents where tests were allowed to continue until subject expiration, the Ethics Committee launched an internal review and issued strict limitations on exposure duration.[[/footnote]] * **A-5: “Cosmic Manipulation"** Not much is known about this power; but it is perceived to alter major things in reality, SCP-8518 usually bends reality to escape. [[footnote]]However, SCP-8518 has never succeeded.[[/footnote]] **Addendum** SCP-8518 is not restricted to mind-based powers. Logs suggest SCP-8518 can also warp space time[[footnote]]This has not been proven yet.[[/footnote]]

Description:
SCP-8417 is a cosmic entity with no variable size or volume. Its appearance appears to be an eye surrounded by cosmic particles protecting the inner form. SCP-8518 does extensive damage to the minds of subjects and personnel. SCP-8518 has 5 different abilities, all used at different times.

A-1: Mind Manipulation
A-2: Control of Emotions
A-3: Aggressiveness Infliction
A-4: Brain Damage
A-5: Cosmic Manipulation

Surface Abilities (A-1 to A-5):

• A-1: "Mind Manipulation”

Manipulates subjects minds to lure sed subject to open containment chamber. Usually causes long-term mind damage with no perceivable cure.

• A-2: "Control of Emotions"

Controls subjects emotions, randomly switching trough harsh and gentle emotions, subject reported to have zero recollection of SCP-8518 after control.

• A-3: "Aggressiveness Infliction "

Gifts subjects enhanced strength, but subjects become aggressive and angry, destroying everything around them.

When addressed about the page, they replied:

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17373503#post-7338888 response to comment "The main site is for Finished works only. Please use the sandbox for drafting. I'd also recommend reading How to write an SCP along with the rest of the Required reading."

This is my first scp so i was not very experienced making this one. I will try to do better next time.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17373503#post-7338907 response to comment "Based on the list-y nature, this feels ai genned."

When I was making the scp, there was already a list in the deleted draft so I just put my idea in the list.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17373503#post-7339481 response to staff post "So you're saying that you used someone else's work without crediting them?"

No, I’m saying that there was a list in the deleted draft, so I decided to do that as well, but I used my own ideas and did not steal work.