Would you be able to ban my old account, as I've lost access to it?

I sent back:

The old account has been banned; an invitation was issued to the current account.

the bottom link is the one locked, the top one was in general before being moved. (could you delete the comment reply posted by me on the top thread as it was a test to see if it was the locked one)

I sent back:

the bottom link is the one locked, the top one was in general before being moved.

Again, is there a pressing reason the thread posted first should be the one unlocked?

(could you delete the comment reply posted by me on the top thread as it was a test to see if it was the locked one)

No, staff only delete posts that contain severe rulebreaking content. If you would like a comment of yours to be disregarded, edit it over with "post removed, ignore" or the like.

AnomalousMuffin2

Phoenixskies01

The application has been declined and the new account has been PMed.

PianoYarn8765

20 Mar 2026, 09:33 https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17638152/scp-9082#post-7652847

the page is now at -11 rating, it would be deleted soon

20 Mar 2026, 14:08 https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17638152/scp-9082#post-7653068 reply to closed staff post, "Please don't leave spammy comments like this."

When the staff deleted my page, it was at -11 rating

20 Mar 2026, 15:13 https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17638152/scp-9082#post-7653098 reply to author post

could you delete the page and paste it on another page that hasn't been created yet, my daft is mainly focused on SCP-9082?

edited to:

could you delete the page and paste it on another page that hasn't been created yet, like SCP-9108, as my daft is mainly focused on SCP-9082?

Of note, the user also posted two of the same thread:

• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17632082/dangerous-scps-housed-at-site-19-that-arent-from-series-one
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17632987/dangerous-scps-housed-at-site-19-that-aren-t-from-series-one

I moved the post that was in the wrong forum and locked it. User then sent this PM:

subject line "Could You Unlock My Thread?"

The thread you locked was before the other thread I posted, it was two hours before the second thread

I replied asking if there was a pressing reason to unlock one thread over the other as neither had a reader response yet, and if one was unlocked then the other would be locked, as repeat threads/spam are not permitted on the site.

Researcher Gublenal

Disclaimer

This page will (eventually) (probably) be the main page for a tale/SCP 001 proposal, but I'm not confident enough in my writing to actually put that in the mainstream. Therefore, I'm putting it off to the side, where it hopefully won't be noticed by people who really care about page quality, because

I'm trying my best, ok?

Here are the main SCP's, although SCP FE-002 is actually the one to start with

SCP FE-001 Twelve Roman Standards
SCP FE-002 On A Frictionless Plane
[…]

When addressed by readers about the site rules, the user responded:

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17613898/operation-five-eagles#post-7610043 reply to comment "I don't think you're permitted to reserve pages."

Fine whatever, but what i meant is "Please don't add to this seireis when I actually already have a plan.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17613898/operation-five-eagles#post-7610050 reply to comment "I know what it means to reserve a page. I'm saying you can't do it."

Fine. I removed it, but i still plan to write those things. It's my story.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17613898/operation-five-eagles#post-7610055 reply to comment "You can plan to do whatever you like, write whatever you want, but this is patently not the place to make pages like this. Use the sandbox, that's what it's for, and you won't have to leave passive aggressive footnotes to voters."

The problem there is I can't like link the pages together, and they tend to kinda sorta disappear, making it hard to make progress.

It's also just like, I'd rather not spend more time on the refrence page than the actual 13 or so SCP's and stories.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17613898/operation-five-eagles#post-7610065 reply to comment "The mainsite is for finished works, not theoretical works-in-progress. If you want to draft something, you should do it on the SCP Sandbox. Edited to reply: Again, you're not allowed to reserve pages by linking them in advance. Pay attention to the advice you're being given, instead of getting defensive."

This part of the work is finished, in that it's a functional mainpage that collects a bunch of other pages I am in the process of writing. Yes, I know graphic design is not my calling. What other wisdom do you have?

NyxOneiros

Nyx_Oneiros

The old account has been issued a ban. The user, as of now, has rejoined with the new account.

TheEssophysicKitt

KittInTheDesert

The old account has been issued a ban. The user may now join with the current account.

NuggetKing1000-2

im so sorry, i forgot the password to that email as i had to make a new one because i cant use numbers in it with wiki dot, so yeah i would like to keep this one and delete the other one, sorry for any inconvinences

Sent back:

Banned the noted account; invite to current account has been issued.

• NuggetKing1000, account created 3 Mar 2026, 23:54
• NuggetKing1000-2, account created 4 Mar 2026, 03:23

Both accounts have had their applications denied. PM sent informing them that a user may only join with one account.

Dr Murd

DogeFan889

well ok this is a head's up then, new account is DogeFan889, Old was Dr Murd, I haven't posted any articles other than some minor contribs editing so nothing needs to be preserved. Thanks for your diligence

Prior account was removed and issued a ban; user may now apply to join the site with the new account.

Hello,
Thank you for the clarification.

At the moment, Site-127 does not yet have five published articles referencing it, nor a completed secure facility file published on the wiki. I am currently working on preparing a proper Site-127 page that follows SCP Wiki standards.

Once the page is completed and/or the site is referenced in multiple articles, I will submit the required links for review.

Thank you for your time and guidance.

Best regards,
Anasguard-Site127

Of note, user is not a member of the site, and has not submitted an application to join as of now.

ETA: about a day later, they sent the same message again

Hello,
Thank you for the clarification.

At the moment, Site-127 does not yet have five published articles referencing it, nor a completed secure facility file published on the wiki. I am currently working on preparing a proper Site-127 page that follows SCP Wiki standards.

Once the page is completed and/or the site is referenced in multiple articles, I will submit the required links for review.

Thank you for your time and guidance.

Best regards,
Anasguard-Site127

Anasguard-site127

Message:
Dear SCP Wiki Team,

I am formally requesting the inclusion of Site-127 in the Foundation Facilities page on SCP Wiki. The site is fully prepared and aligned with the SCP universe standards, and adding it to the facilities list will allow the community to explore and reference it appropriately.

Thank you very much for your attention and consideration. I look forward to your positive response.

Best regards,
Anasguard-Site127

I sent back:

Of note, staff does have a declined application from this user on file, from 05/04/25:

I want to help the community and suggest a new site (Site-127).

User is a member of the sandbox site, but has no edit history.

Chollerman

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17573189/the-eternal-contradiction#post-7524336

Okay, definitely okay, this is a really idea, but it really need work, can you please create a sandbox and link it to your forum, this idea is kind of meh and okay but can you review it, not talking bad of your idea but, this is AI-generated text? just need review

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17565338/seeking-greenlights-crystals-to-anywhere#post-7524304

This is really interesting for you seek the greenlight to this idea…

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572261/tempural-anomalies-department-seeking-greenlight#post-7524303

Okay, i know im not a reviewer, but with this description, i can say that this can be really a joke entry/joke goi, but with a reviewing, greenlights can accept your idea, not saying if they will accept or reject

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572774/seeking-greenlight-concrete-circle#post-7524301

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572774/seeking-greenlight-concrete-circle#post-7524301

Of note, all of the rest of their forum posts also have some form of broken guideline/questionable content:

• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572102/scp-9855-the-ball-who-magnetize-ecology draft thread without greenlights, "I think i need for someone rating +5, i passed 3 hours editing this page, feedbacks! 🕵️‍♂️👨‍💻"
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-3199/comments/show#post-7522831 uncollapsed image, "the thing on the middle of its legs are a pennis?"
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17573544/seeking-greenlight-scp-9855-the-ball-who-magnetize-ecology concept critique thread with sandbox link

Given that staff have needed to address every post this user has submitted, recommending revoke on next infraction.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572768/scp-9121#post-7522983 (response to comment, "D-8693 continues to suffer in agony, “Please kill me!” D-8693 says as they plea for suicide. For me, this single sentence ruined everything else this article had going for it. -1.")

You are softer than a wet sponge if you found this disturbing.

If this type of content (which, mind you, was included in the content warning), makes you feel disturbed, then first of all, the article did its job in making you feel something. Second, the SCP Foundation is a dark and mysterious place, containing horrid creatures and events. Therefore, the passage which you have included is to be expected.

Your reasoning makes no sense and you are an idiot.

The user also posted a comment on another author's page: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17572710/scp-9139#post-7522987 post title "Absurd"

So this SCP succeeds, but SCP-9121 does not?

What an awful, subhuman community. It has degenerated into nothingness.

User deleted their account before staff enacted any disciplinary measures.