Xer0ver

• https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17506989/we-interrupt-this-video-to-bring-you-the-future Draft Critique thread without greenlights
• https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17506989/we-interrupt-this-video-to-bring-you-the-future#post-7489504 double-post comment
• https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17695817/we-interrupt-this-video-to-bring-you-the-future Idea Critique thread that does not follow template
• https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18193445/we-interrupt-this-video-to-bring-you-the-future another Draft Critique thread without greenlights
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18193445/we-interrupt-this-video-to-bring-you-the-future#post-8692079 another double-post comment
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-10629348/new-draft-forum-policies#post-8885130 request for feedback in a thread for discussing forum policy

Most recently, they posted a new thread requesting assistance, clearly demonstrating that they hadn't read any of the instructions they were provided in the previous threads:

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18280868/how-does-the-greenlighting-process-work#post-8914382 thread description "I posted one of my drafts on the draft idea forum, but the mods told me to put it in a different forum that nobody also replied to." (of note, all of their threads have replies)

Help, how do I get my ideas reviewed?

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18280868/how-does-the-greenlighting-process-work#post-8932746

So, what's the template and where do I get greenlights?

Arsona

• 3 Aug 2026, 16:07 http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18271064/scp-9232-critques-750-words-long full draft in forum, no greenlights
• 4 Aug 2026, 14:14 http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18273984/scp-article-seeking-green-light https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18273984/scp-article-seeking-green-light full draft in concept critique forum
• 4 Aug 2026, 16:41 http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18274311/scp-xxxx-seeking-green-light full draft in forum, no greenlights
• 4 Aug 2026, 17:34 http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18274311/scp-xxxx-seeking-green-light#post-8897351 full draft in same thread as above, no greenlights

Their only other forum post is on a coldposted page currently rated at -18: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9232/comments/show#post-8887068 post title "I would very much appreciate any advice and noticings any of you have."

This is the first SCP that I have published so I’m completely fine with whateve criticisms and advice you have for me.

A warning was given to the user on their most recent spampost; they were told further infractions would result in their membership being revoked.

Evolexian

SCP-9947 is a rusty colored skin tone sentient humanoid slim figure approximately 2.1 meters in height with an arm span of roughly 1.5 meters with curved and saltatorial legs which helps SCP-9947 to leap over 3-6 meters in the air.

Upon receiving downvotes, they started spamming comments in the discussion thread:

• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9947/comments/show#post-8775144 I think I'm getting it. made a few revisions for 9947 there was bit more than i thought
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9947/comments/show#post-8775441 I think I fixed it there is something missing but i just cant put my finger on it
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9947/comments/show#post-8776554 Fixed the emails for O5 and Dr.[Redacted] made minor adjustments. there is just something im missing but i cant figure out what. i would like some help a little.
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9947/comments/show#post-8777100 AINT NO WAY LEFT OVER NUMBERS 8129 WAS IN THE CONTAINMENT PROCEEDURES LMAOOOO
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9947/comments/show#post-8778083 so many typos. didnt even catch. wish someone can tell me sooner and not just -1 and leave without a why. cut me some slack i just got here
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9947/comments/show#post-8778254 Thank you. Mostly everyone who voted just -1 and doesn't tell me why. Like cmon i just got here lolz
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9947/comments/show#post-8778268 As of now it is -11 I wish I did better. I hope that they actually read it or just saw a single typo and -1 most of them didn't even tell me why. One of them -1 my rough page and here as well. :/
• http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9947/comments/show#post-8778271 Tomorrow is a new day…

• MiyamuraTakeda, 24 Jul 2026, 11:43 (12 hours ago)
  • "password: I will follow the rules"
• torokamitakahashi, 24 Jul 2026, 11:16 (12 hours ago)
  • "Hello"

Both accounts have had their applications denied. PM sent informing them that a user may only join with one account.

Floofs

no crit i suck at it [green lightbulb emoji]

no crit love comedy [green lightbulb emoji]

I dont got good crit myself but this sounds yummy and fun so if its not at 2 yet [green lightbulb emoji]

They submitted the following appeal:

Ah, Sorry so it was cuase i was being too uncrity, I have been busy helping another writier with their anomly on my own, and just wanted to greenlight some storys i saw on the disc without having time for doing crit on them, i didnt mean for it to come off as i was explicitly going out of my way not to crit. I'd like to appeal, it wont happen again.

I feel as if it isn't explained enough that being to liberal with gl useage without crit can result in it being revoked. And this was a one time thing due to my lack of knowledge on this rule. I was to busy criting some elses long work to have time to crit other works as i am a little inexperienced and didn't understand that. I apologize. That is all.

The appeal was declined. nico, awb, Naepic, Revan, AstralNavigator, Mew, TacticalNecromancy, Aster, and myself voted to decline.

From catmaster7015:

I will be using this account.

Sent back:

from Catmasterfan7015, an hour and a half later:

this account not being band and im not the same person as that catmaster7015 tho

Sent back:

HELLLOOOOIMBERITY

Of note, the user replied to a critique comment in the discussion thread with: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18160889/scp-8756#post-8598970

I just finished fixing it

Original text:

—-

User edit:

Special Containment Procedures: SCP-8756 cannot currently be contained by standard Foundation assets due to its intangible nature. Containment efforts are focused on monitoring local civilian tracking networks for manifestations.

Description: Scp-8756 is a humanoid anomoly that can manifest and de-manifest, it is unknown where it goes when it de-manifest but the reserch staff thinks it goes to a diffrent demension. SCP-8756 manifests as a visually and physically identical replica of the target subject. SCP-8756 acts as a severe, localized cognitohazard. Prolonged exposure to the anomaly induces extreme psychological distress in the targeted subject, ultimately resulting in self-termination, the earliest recorded manifestation was in 1992 [REDACTED] Texas. Testing indicates that SCP-8756 possesses no physical mass, rendering it immune to conventional physical trauma and ballistic weaponry…Due to SCP-8756's rapid variable manifestation properties (the entity uniformly replicates the exact physical likeness of local civilian targets), visual photographic documentation is not possible. Following initial contact, SCP-8756 maintains constant surveillance on the targeted subject for three to seven days. Upon the conclusion of this period, the anomaly resorts to overwhelming physical force to execute the subject.

Page reverted, staff posted.

• Catmasterfan7015, account created 17 Jul 2026, 15:11 "I would like to join. I do not know what to put here."
• catmaster7015, account created 17 Jul 2026, 15:05 "I would like to join. I don't know what to put here."

Both accounts have had their applications denied. PM sent informing them that a user may only join with one account.

Doctor Steam

Upon the page receiving downvotes, they edited the text to:

Class Euclid

I GIVE UP, I tried reading the guild and it didn't help I tried writing my first page differently I tried asking for feedback I tried to make it something you all would like, y'all should be ashamed for judging someone's first page so hard, how would you all like it it people only have negative reviews of your work and never give feedback huh HOW WOULD YOU FLIPPING LIKE IT

When addressed about following guides for formatting, they replied: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18136016/scp-9136#post-8530838

I read it again. It was unhelpful. Can you help me format it? I don't wanted it to get review bombed again, that's what happened to my original attempt

They also messaged a staff member requesting the deletion timer be stopped because the page "got review bombed".

i will use that acount

about 11 hours later:

noting

Sent back:

ETA: confirming that ban was enacted per above.

• RADZIKDR, account created 4 Jul 2026, 05:21
• DOCTORRADZIK, account created 30 Jun 2026, 03:23

Both accounts have had their applications denied. PM sent informing them that a user may only join with one account.

Blue Son

Facility 667 was a formerly Classified Facility where the Council stored Highly Dangerous SCPs who were pending Classification and were still being studied. However when the breach occurred the 05 Council had no choice but to declassify everything it had on the facility to the people it was sending in to clean things up. Unfortunately Facility 667 had many world ending threats and if it wasn’t for the Arrival and the Foundation’s first encounter with SCP-???? all life on the planet would have been wiped out. Afterwards all recorded of the SCPs that were in the facility were shredded because SCP-???? Has the ability to erase even cosmic entities from existence. Please note that for one reason or another the 05 Council made it official policy to not keep a file on SCP-????. Any other records of the Containment Breach at Facility 667 have been destroyed, been deemed to contradictory to officially document or just be flat out unreliable.

Upon the page being downvoted, they posted the comment: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18068033/containment-breach-of-facility-667-purged#post-8358756 (subject line "Down Votes")

Who are down voting these? Is this just a popularity contest? If so then I might as well just use Fanfic.net

When a reviewer posted "Your article is just a single badly-worded and formatted paragraph, what were you expecting to happen? The wiki has plenty of resources for new authors, including a sandbox to draft articles properly.", the user responded: https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-18068033/containment-breach-of-facility-667-purged#post-8358806

Then why is everything so vague? Like I read over the rules multiple times and it took the. 5th reading to find the code I was supposed to drop in. Plus if these articles are open for public edit then you leave the assumption that people are going to add to the post.

Hi, I meant to delete the PenguinKing12 account and would like this one the PenguinKing122 account to be the one accepted
Thanks
PenguinKing122

P.S. Nice PFP

As of my reading the message, the prior account was not yet deleted. As such, it has been issued a permanent ban. Sent back:

• PenguinKing12, account created 10 Jun 2026, 04:27
  • application text "Good morning. I love the ‘SCP’ universe and would love to be able to make some SCPs. I would love to share my ideas. I will absolutely be kind and considerate. Please consider this request. Thanks Bye"
• PenguinKing122, account created 10 Jun 2026, 09:48

Both accounts have had their applications denied. PM sent informing them that a user may only join with one account.

WASDA10

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9825

**Item #:** SCP-9825 **Object Class:**Uncontained **Special Containment Procedures:** As of this moment, no successful method of containing SCP-9825 has yet been developed, and efforts are underway by the Foundation's Paracybernetic Containment Division's 5th bureau to develop a containment procedure. Until such a procedure is established, select foundation staff should follow protocols for early detection and mitigation of SCP-9825's effects. **Special Detection Protocols:** Site directors and Assistant site directors are assigned to perform weekly validations of the SCP database, and are to verify that the SCP objects under their supervision are not affected by SCP-9825. At all times, a team of six independent members assigned to SCP-9825 is to observe the latest manifestation of its effects, and warn the PCD 5th bureau upon demanifestation. Additionally, any security incidents involving Foundation personnel attempting to gain access to SCP objects that are not assigned to them should immediately be reported to the PCD 5th bureau for further investigation. Supervisors of Keter-class objects are required to draw up contingency plans to counter the effects of SCP-9825, which are to be reviewed annually. **Description:** SCP-9825 is believed to be a cyber-memetic virus inside of the SCP database. Its effects manifest through the hijacking of random SCP reports (from here on referred to as the "Target"), and the generation of "inverted" reports in their stead. These are based on the SCP reports classified under the number corresponding to the Target's mirrored report number (//e.g.// If the target is SCP-ABCD, the inverted report will be based on SCP-DCBA, from here on referred to as the "Substitute"). The generated report will contain all information found in the Substitute's report, though altered by SCP-9825. Any text will be mirrored, and written in a backwards fashion, with the SCP classification at the bottom and final remarks at the top. Image and audio data is likewise affected, with images appearing as their negatives, and audio playing backwards. Video data has both its colors inverted, and is played backwards. Cognitohazards are rendered ineffective under the inversion effects, potentially causing critical security leaks. SCP-9825 not only affects the original report, but likewise produces inverted copies of all supplementary material associated with the Substitute. The Target changes periodically, typically within a time period between one week and three months. As of this moment, the SCP object affected by SCP-9825 is [[[SCP-9821 | 9821-PCS]]]. SCP-9825 was first discovered on March 31st, 1985, during a security incident involving When SCP-9825 targets a new SCP object, all data related to the object in question is lost. There are no known methods of safeguarding the Target's. Physical copies of the Target's report will appear as the Substitute report under SCP-9825's effects. Visual footage will likewise display the Substitute report. Audio recordings of readings of the Target's report are changed into a backwards reading of the Substitute report. Memorization is also ineffective due to SCP-9825's effect on Foundation personnel. The substitution effect is assumed to be global, and irrespective of ownership. In one instance, a Foundation asset imbedded in a hostile group of interest was able to confirm that a stolen report of an SCP object affected by SCP-9825 had also been altered. Any attempts to edit or alter the Substitute report in any way is ineffective, as all changes are immediately reverted by SCP-9825. When a new SCP object is targeted, all data of the original Target is restored. It is unknown whether the restored report is identical to the original, or whether SCP-9825 makes any alterations. The nature of SCP-9825 makes it impossible to verify the Target data's integrity after demanifestation. Under SCP-9825's effects, Foundation staff assigned to the Target will lose all knowledge of the Target, and instead gain in-depth, though erroneous, knowledge of the Substitute. In most cases, they will believe themselves to be assigned to the Substitute SCP object, and attempt to gain access to the Substitute in order to perform the duties of the assigned personnel. Typically, they will attempt to do the opposite of what the Substitute's protocols prescribe, and will become alarmed if they see anyone performing the correct protocols. This can either result in a false containment breach alarm being sounded, or in more extreme cases, physical altercations by affected staff and a forceful application of wrong procedures, risking a containment breach themselves. Early detection of SCP-9825 manifestations is therefore key to avoiding security incidents. Personnel under the effects of SCP-9825 are to be amnesticized, and temporarily reassigned to a different site. In the case that affected staff are armed and considered dangerous (//e.g.// in the case that MTF operatives are affected by SCP-9825), and de-escalation efforts fail, neutralization of the threat is permitted. When a new Target is chosen by SCP-9825, all staff assigned to the previous Target regain all knowledge regarding the object, and can be reassigned to their original position. Although all documentation of the Target is lost during SCP-9825's manifestation, the SCP objects themselves remain unaffected. In order to avoid containment breaches, new staff needs to be assigned to these objects immediately upon detection of a new Target. In order to re-enact security protocols, the "Containment Reconstruction Database" was created, in which SCP objects can be algorithmically cross-referenced with reports obtained from Foundations located in alternate dimensions, as these do not seem to be affected by SCP-9825. Although the validity of these reports in our own dimension are not 100% certain, adjustments of the database over the years has ensured an accuracy of 96%.

Excerpt of note:

Special Detection Protocols: Site directors and Assistant site directors are assigned to perform weekly validations of the SCP database, and are to verify that the SCP objects under their supervision are not affected by SCP-9825. At all times, a team of six independent members assigned to SCP-9825 is to observe the latest manifestation of its effects, and warn the PCD 5th bureau upon demanifestation. Additionally, any security incidents involving Foundation personnel attempting to gain access to SCP objects that are not assigned to them should immediately be reported to the PCD 5th bureau for further investigation. Supervisors of Keter-class objects are required to draw up contingency plans to counter the effects of SCP-9825, which are to be reviewed annually.

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9821

.sedivorp yllausu ti taht erom swonk nioc siht fi rednow ot decrof m'I ;desserpxe sah lobo eht tluser suougibma ylurt ylno dna tsrif eht si sihT .sedis htob morf dedrocer saw gnitirw lacitnedi dna ,egde no fi sa gnicaf saw lobo eht derrucco tneve ezeerf lausu eht nehw revewoh ,lausu sa gnisuoh sti ni nups nioc ehT .tneve ralugnis a saw flesti pilf eht ,setunim erem nihtiw pilf eht fo tcejbus eht fo demrofni erew ew hguohtlA .dessentiw evah ew lobo eht fo noitavitca tsegnarts eht si sihT
:setoN noitavitcA

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9871 (later blanked)

.desimorpmoc erew 000,7 tsael ta ,stnediser 000,98 sti fO .noitcele 3102 sti gnirud aniloraC htroN ,ellivehsA ni derrucco 9213-PCS fo noitcefni 3 egatS A

HSA-1-9213 weivretnI :1.9213 mudneddA

.cilbup ni ti deretnuocne reve slaiciffo evah ron 1-9213-PCS fo noitacifitnedi lausiv evitisop a ekam ot elbanu neeb evah slaiciffo noitadnuoF .stsixe yllautca 1-9213-PCS ton ro rehtehw raelc yltneserp ton si tI

junoyen

Note, the feedback was, "Indestructible rigid-body insect swarm is a fun concept, but the description runs wayyy too long for what should be a relatively simple anomaly. There's effectively no payoff for their secondary anomalies, particularly the swarm's ability to communicate with images and words (which almost overshadows the whole thing for me with how important it should be and how little it ends up mattering). This needs an aggressive edit and a better sense of what information is relevant, versus what's just wasting the reader's time."

https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-17746562/scp-9168#post-8168121

heaven forbid im trying to actually worldbuild 😭🙏
ykw whatever thanks regardless

edited about 20 minutes later to:

heaven forbid im trying to set a vibe
ykw whatever its not my fault that some person wants everything spoon-fed to them instead of something actually decent

They also posted this on another page in the negatives: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-9176/comments/show#post-8161713

yo i fw this but lwk the title kinda fucked up it should be "SCP-XXXX" and not "Scp XXXX"
ill upvote anyway

Would you be able to ban my old account, as I've lost access to it?

I sent back:

The old account has been banned; an invitation was issued to the current account.

the bottom link is the one locked, the top one was in general before being moved. (could you delete the comment reply posted by me on the top thread as it was a test to see if it was the locked one)

I sent back:

the bottom link is the one locked, the top one was in general before being moved.

Again, is there a pressing reason the thread posted first should be the one unlocked?

(could you delete the comment reply posted by me on the top thread as it was a test to see if it was the locked one)

No, staff only delete posts that contain severe rulebreaking content. If you would like a comment of yours to be disregarded, edit it over with "post removed, ignore" or the like.

AnomalousMuffin2

Phoenixskies01

The application has been declined and the new account has been PMed.