Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »
AgentMandela
stormfallenstormfallen 08 Dec 2019 18:13
in discussion SCP Chat / Users » AgentMandela

Started with ignorant transphobia, escalated into asshole transphobia then outright ridiculous transphobia. Weeklong per op consensus.

AgentMandela by stormfallenstormfallen, 08 Dec 2019 18:13
Re: Sheyki
ProcyonLotorProcyonLotor 07 Dec 2019 21:06
in discussion SCP Chat / Users » Sheyki

да, товарищ

Re: Sheyki by ProcyonLotorProcyonLotor, 07 Dec 2019 21:06
Re: Sheyki
LilyFlowerLilyFlower 07 Dec 2019 12:49
in discussion SCP Chat / Users » Sheyki

C-comrade coony? 😍


~🏵~Flower Power~🏵~

Re: Sheyki by LilyFlowerLilyFlower, 07 Dec 2019 12:49

It was brought up in SSSC by UraniumEmpire this bit of interaction between sicklysweetfansicklysweetfan and ShadowsDaughterFanShadowsDaughterFan. Snapshot provided here. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/526584173180485642/652764891287126026/is_this_what_I_think_it_is.png

In case the image doesn't work, please direct your attention to the collapsible below. All comments posted on the current SCP-4755 slot.

Worth noting that these are the first three comments on SCP-4755, made three minutes after the article had been posted. sicklysweetfansicklysweetfan also has a non-disc record that can be found here: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-12845262/non-disc-record-sicklysweetfan

The rapid response from both users, as well as the similarity of the usernames and that both accounts were created within four minutes of each other, is incredibly suspicious.

Noting that user has deleted their account. And nothing of value…

Re: Disciplinary - Sheyki by ProcyonLotorProcyonLotor, 07 Dec 2019 04:36

In the spirit of full disclosure, my initial response was as follows:

The first half is self-explanatory. It was a shameless ripoff of Doki Doki Literature Club and it was not a well-executed one at that. The second half is regarding their repeatedly ignoring well thought-out critique in both threads and at least one direct coldpost to the site.

This was not unsolicited and was in response to a direct PM asking me to explain my vote on their coldpost. So I did. When I am messaged directly about my thoughts on a piece, by someone known for wasting critiquers' time, I am comfortable using a level of candor and bluntness I would not use in a critique thread.

They sent me a fairly entitled follow-up PM, saying directly that "that wasn't very nice".

I indeed responded that I am not obligated to be nice, because I am not. I gave honest critique in the only manner I thought would reach the user based on their previous behavior.

Permaban enacted.

Re: Disciplinary - Sheyki by ZynZyn, 07 Dec 2019 03:27

Given all the above, I'd agree with a ban for trolling/immaturity.

Re: Sheyki
Jacob ConwellJacob Conwell 07 Dec 2019 03:12
in discussion SCP Chat / Users » Sheyki

Yeah. With that response, I'm going to say that should they reapply we say no.

Re: Sheyki by Jacob ConwellJacob Conwell, 07 Dec 2019 03:12
Re: Disciplinary - Sheyki by ProcyonLotorProcyonLotor, 07 Dec 2019 03:06
Re: Sheyki
ProcyonLotorProcyonLotor 07 Dec 2019 03:05
in discussion SCP Chat / Users » Sheyki

Sent me the following PM.

The sheer butthurt is absolutely adorable.

Re: Sheyki by ProcyonLotorProcyonLotor, 07 Dec 2019 03:05

New site member ShadowsDaughterFanShadowsDaughterFan (account age 8 days, site membership 1 day) recently coldposted an article to the mainsite, which is currently at -28: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-4755

Item #: SCP-4755

Object Class: Keter

Special Containment Procedures: If SCP-4755 escapes containment, immediately flee the area and send a help signal to ███████ if █████ then ██████████ █████ ███████████████ ██ .

Description: SCP-4755, also known as "Shadows Spawn", is a creature created by SCP-4754.
SCP-4755 is generally a Safe class SCP, however, when commanded by SCP-4754, it can become very deadly making it a Keter class.

SCP-4755 does not require:
-Food
-Water
-Heat

Addendum: Unfortunately, Special Agent ███████████ was killed on its discovery. Dr. ███████ recommends it's disposal as soon as it spawns.

-Image of Agent ███████████ will be classified until approval of ██████████████-

When addressed by staff regarding site quality expectations, they responded: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12845754/scp-4755#post-4439639

Okay sorry it was really just a practice for the main thing, can you keep it up on the site so someone doesn't take my page. Thank you. :)

I'd be surprised if they're older than 12. Keep an eye on.

Re: Sheyki
ZynZyn 07 Dec 2019 01:48
in discussion SCP Chat / Users » Sheyki

Agreed, and revoked. Disc thread up: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-12846391/disciplinary-sheyki

Re: Sheyki by ZynZyn, 07 Dec 2019 01:48

New site member SheykiSheyki (account age 3 days) recently posted a thread in General asking to be unbanned from chat.

Their chat record is here: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-12844474/sheyki

After the staff response was noted and the ban lifting request thread was locked, they posted a spam thread: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12846382/savage

Their membership has been revoked. Given their behavior, do we want to call for a ban for trolling, or immaturity?

Disciplinary - Sheyki by ZynZyn, 07 Dec 2019 01:48
Re: Sheyki
A Random DayA Random Day 07 Dec 2019 01:37
in discussion SCP Chat / Users » Sheyki

He doesn't know when to quit: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12846382/savage

> Easy answer.

> No.

> Thread Locked.

Savage.

I think it's time we made that call for him. I'm calling for a membership revocation.

Re: Sheyki by A Random DayA Random Day, 07 Dec 2019 01:37

I received the following today:

At this point I have not responded to the PM.

Re: Non-Disc Record - Doctor Rodes by ZynZyn, 07 Dec 2019 00:50
Re: Sheyki
ZynZyn 07 Dec 2019 00:48
in discussion SCP Chat / Users » Sheyki

Note, they recently posted the following to the General forum: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12846053/any-way-i-could-get-unbanned-from-irc

Thread has been locked and archived.

Re: Sheyki by ZynZyn, 07 Dec 2019 00:48

No comment on whether the old account should be banned or not, but I do know that the metadata page has been updated accordingly as per a conversation in #site17 about it a week or so ago.

page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License