Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page »
Re: Ace_james
ProcyonLotorProcyonLotor 12 Apr 2021 21:40
in discussion SCP Chat / Chat Users » Ace_james

Another breakpost:

While it is best that they are handled as swiftly as possible, the chat team does not need to take appeals immediately upon them coming up. Reasonable allowances can be made in the future for things like log collation.

While I support allowing the decision to remain out of user fairness, in the future I ask that, in edge cases such as these, the hearing or judgement of an appeal wait until the person hearing it has access to sufficient information.

Re: Ace_james by ProcyonLotorProcyonLotor, 12 Apr 2021 21:40

PM sent:

I am writing to inform you that your membership to the SCP Wiki has been revoked and you have been issued a 1 year ban as a result of the behavior documented in your Disciplinary thread:

You are welcome to appeal this ban by either responding to this message, sending a wikidot to any other member of the Disciplinary Committee, or by logging into our chat and asking to speak to someone about appealing a site ban.

If not, you will be welcome to re-apply in one year.

SCP Wiki Disciplinary Committee

Emergency revoked. Agreeing with ban.

Can someone send the PM please?

Re: Disciplinary - speedykillercat by ZynZyn, 12 Apr 2021 17:19

This is a tremendous amount of flailing even if allowed to be viewed in the best possible light. It's clear this person would benefit from additional time to understand the community and reconsider their approach.

I support a 1y for indistinguishable

We're doing OK, the best we can. Take care of yourself, Radd', and don't pressure yourself too hard, we'll be waiting for you!

Speedykillercat Speedykillercat (W: 5d|S: 1d) Recently posted an article to the SCP-5247 slot. The article was first incomplete, then was revised to add more content, suggesting that the user utilized the main site to post a WIP draft.

When it started to accumulate downvotes, the user posted repeatedly in the discussion lamenting the downvotes.

User also posted several issues in the Wikidot feedback/bugs forum:

Finally, in their profile, they list their real name as "N*". While it is possible that this is a redacted version of their real name, there are also the same amount of characters "under" asterisks as the well-known slur.

All of this leads me to believe that this user is not of age to be a member of the wiki, thus I am recommending a year-long ban for being indistinguishable from underage.

Pausing until early June, when my bleach-soaked COVID nightmare of a job will be over ;-; Hope you all are doing okay

Re: Ace_james
ChaoSeraChaoSera 12 Apr 2021 14:50
in discussion SCP Chat / Chat Users » Ace_james

To clarify this, while the appeal was going on I asked several times for logs that show the immaturity and was only provided with one minor incident. While I fully believed fellow operators when I was told it was a repeated pattern of behaviour I can't in good conscience deny an appeal just on those grounds. To be clear, this is not intended as a slight against other ops or anything like that, just as a clarification on my decision to accept the appeal. The full logs above I received about an hour or so later from cybersqyd and it took about that long for ver to assemble them (the effort is massively appreciated as well). With the full context of those logs I would have denied the appeal but I'm not a fan of reverting my decisions after the fact (unless we're talking more malicious offences than immaturity). Should they not improve their behaviour the logs can be taken into account that time.

Re: Ace_james by ChaoSeraChaoSera, 12 Apr 2021 14:50
Re: Ace_james
cybersqydcybersqyd 12 Apr 2021 14:39
in discussion SCP Chat / Chat Users » Ace_james

Per the consensus of four critstaff members, Ace_James has been given a C&D from offering to provide critique within #thecritters due to a consistent pattern of poor quality critique (attached log being the most recent example).

An appeal remains open to them in #site17.

Re: Ace_james by cybersqydcybersqyd, 12 Apr 2021 14:39
MalyceGravesMalyceGraves 12 Apr 2021 14:37
in discussion SCP Chat / Chat Users » Ace_james

Ace_jamesAce_james has generally been rather immature and questionable in chat. This behavior is extensive and fairly difficult to document, though the following is an attempt to do so.

After receiving multiple complaints from various people, I decided to go ahead and issue a 1 year ban for general immaturity. User immediately appealed:

At the time of the appeal, it became apparent that assembling the logs of the user's behavior was not a quick task, so Chao decided to accept the appeal and give them an opportunity to correct their behavior.

Ace_james by MalyceGravesMalyceGraves, 12 Apr 2021 14:37

Backing Procy on this, for the reasons he and others have set out.

Re: Disciplinary - Hunter12396 by ZynZyn, 12 Apr 2021 05:47

I'm on break due to illness but it would be negligent of me not to respond in a timely manner as I'm one of the three network ops who actively engage with the rank:

Expansion of #skipirc to non-SCP channels is not something that's been ruled out. Indeed, should conditions on SynIRC continue to deteriorate, I've loose plans to invite some Syn communities to join us (certainly not across the board- a small subset of quality, non-problematic channels). And I've not sworn off the network growing in other ways (although there are currently no plans to pursue this actively), should there be an appetite for it (unlikely but not out of the question).

I am fine with #help being de-emphasized or even put on ice, but not merged with 17.

While I mostly agree with this proposal (most every request in #help is really one for #site17), I wonder about requests that are specific to the SkipIRC network. For instance, issues with channel modes or dropping a bad registration or whatever. Could such inquiries be directed at #skipirc? Or is the official recommendation that they all go through #site17, even though not all staff members there (with modes) are actually network ops?

User The black mamba263The black mamba263 joined 17, asked to be invited to the sandbox and revealed they were underage. Banned for three years.

Re: Generic 17 Ban Thread by stormfallenstormfallen, 11 Apr 2021 15:41

Ban mirrored on mainsite.

Re: Generic 17 Ban Thread by ZynZyn, 11 Apr 2021 04:27

Ban mirrored on mainsite.

Re: Generic 17 Ban Thread by ZynZyn, 11 Apr 2021 04:27
page »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License