Declined RustySCP for name, and application that did not meet criteria:
Hello, My name is Rusty (Luca for real) and i would like to join the site as i am experienced in SCPs. I love them and I like writing them. I am hoping to make an SCP.
Recent Forum Posts
Noting that my conversation with the user was fairly quick—they PMed me while I was speaking with a co-author and also juggling other tasks.
Gist of the conversation:
Sorry for not having full logs, I closed out of the PMs. I will note that when I offered to refer them to Soulless they were fairly polite (as little or as much as that counts for given the context here).
in discussion SCP Wiki / Disciplinary » Disciplinary - brandonfave / bauerbach / bauerbach1 / bradleya123 / DrAuerbach / Dr Auerbach
I wonder what the next one will be!
in discussion SCP Wiki / Disciplinary » Disciplinary - brandonfave / bauerbach / bauerbach1 / bradleya123 / DrAuerbach / Dr Auerbach
Noting that the user has deleted their account… again.
It has been put as a request that it is known this user has attempted to reach out to multiple staff members regarding this thread. Please check in with chat staff or relevant chat administrators for updates if one is contacted by the user. Thank you.
The following is my conversation with her, with an email removed. I am willing to email her with further communication if other chat operators and chat administrators believe this is the useful position we should take.
Living the dream, or dreaming the life?
In support.
PMed me to ask about having her chat record removed. It was not.
Supporting now, can't remember if I said so in the moment.
In support.
Supporting.
I was present for the incident but RL events kept my from voicing my opinion.
Mr. bluesoul, I am for the big (perma).
Disc record here. Came into 17 today exhibiting the exact same behavior as what's led to what is almost certainly a renewed permanent ban from the site.
Ban was removed about 90 minutes later, came back about 5 hours later.
We are going straight to perma here by consensus of three chat admins, a former admin, and several half-operators, with no chat staff opposed.
in discussion SCP Wiki / Disciplinary » Disciplinary - brandonfave / bauerbach / bauerbach1 / bradleya123 / DrAuerbach / Dr Auerbach
Perma, and forever.
Admin, SCP Wiki
in discussion SCP Wiki / Disciplinary » Disciplinary - brandonfave / bauerbach / bauerbach1 / bradleya123 / DrAuerbach / Dr Auerbach
Given the user's apparent problems, I think it would be a mercy for them to find something else to do.
Backing perma, or at least a year. They need to stop and seem to be unable to manage that themself, given how they've been in 17.
in discussion SCP Wiki / Disciplinary » Disciplinary - brandonfave / bauerbach / bauerbach1 / bradleya123 / DrAuerbach / Dr Auerbach
Perma. This is so stupid and I think we're all sick of it.
in discussion SCP Wiki / Non-Disciplinary Record-Keeping » Non-Disc Record - Christinewho
New site member Christinewho (account age and site membership 4 days) has only two posts on the forum, both of which are vague critique addressed by staff:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12972937/scp-idea-need-a-review#post-4478165
I'm not sure if I read something like that myself since I am pretty new too and there's so many…But, it seems pretty good…But, you should wait for more.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12969737/my-first-scp-ideas#post-4477651
I think for a Keter the base is good, but most Keter have a more restricted containment procedure (but it depends on them). The 4 guards it's a good idea. Also, maybe but it 4 clearance only…. Also, how would people not be able to make eye contact with it Sorry, I'm not that good with English. By the way, I can't give you're a greenlight and it doesn't merit one yet… In my opinion…
I've sent them the usual "please be more conscientious with your reviews" PM. If this continues, drop a C&D.
in discussion SCP Wiki / Disciplinary » Disciplinary - brandonfave / bauerbach / bauerbach1 / bradleya123 / DrAuerbach / Dr Auerbach
Perma
Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!
in discussion SCP Wiki / Disciplinary » Disciplinary - brandonfave / bauerbach / bauerbach1 / bradleya123 / DrAuerbach / Dr Auerbach
I would, you don't just walk away from history.
in discussion SCP Wiki / Disciplinary » Disciplinary - brandonfave / bauerbach / bauerbach1 / bradleya123 / DrAuerbach / Dr Auerbach
Noting that they made yet another account to effectively clear the history associated with their current one. The new account is Dr Auerbach (with a space) and they sent me this PM:
As I said in my profile description, I am going to put all past non-disc. and disciplinary infractions behind me (including deleting my account) and strive to be a more valuable member of the community. I will re-join the SCP wiki on 1/23/2021, and you won't get any PMs from me until then (for real this time).
I sincerely apologize for and deeply regret everything bad I have ever done on the wiki, ever since May 17, 2017 (yep, this included the non-disc. stuff)! I was originally going to be away for five years, but the posting of my first successful SCP-914 test log entry made me reconsider. I might continue interacting with the community in other ways on r/SCP, including posting concept are and development progress updates for a fan game I am making. I may also start my own SCP YouTube channel with animations based on articles on the wiki, similarly to what SCP ILLUSTRATED does.
Sincerely,
brandonfave/bauerbach/bauerbach1/bradleya123/DrAuerbach/Dr Auerbach.
Followed 5 minutes later with:
I forgot to mention in my last PM that I do not have any other Wikidot accounts. This is my actual last PM. See you in a year!
Given that they've repeatedly broken their word (how many "this is the last PM messages has it been now?), they continue pestering staff with messages to add to O5, they're trying to "put the rulebreaking stuff behind them" by creating yet another new account to effectively ignore what they've already done, they continue to apologize without actually improving, and they've already been permabanned before… do we want to institute another ban?
Declined SCP Remote Miao for name, and application that did not meet criteria (was the required material, but in Chinese).
