Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page »

New site member PlaierwonPlaierwon recently coldposted three articles and spamposted a bunch of question posts, along with making some sort of aggressive comments:

I'm just going to say that this article was shit. Maybe a joke SCP. Never the less, I think this is most likely your first SCP. Try working on making it longer than a 2nd grader's essay, and try making the grammar make sense in every little bit.

I'm currently pressed for time so I can't post a full record, but keep an eye on this one.

Non-Disc Record - Plaierwon by ZynZyn, 19 Jul 2018 06:32

Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these butterflies from the swift clearing of their forums. We got you covered, enjoy your vacation! εїз εїз

Got an appeal from Chattheleaper thing:

I've received a year-long ban from the scp wiki for "participating in brigading"? I didn't consciously participate in any brigading behavior, and would greatly appreciate an explanation for this, as I'd done nothing up until now only to find myself with a year-long ban.



The way you have voted is only on specifically targeted articles, within similar time frames, and do not deviate from that. Therefore, your behavior has been deemed brigading. I understand you may not have been aware of this. If you would like to appeal, you may access #site17 on IRC platform.


Living the dream, or dreaming the life?

Yet another update. Mostly some wording changes here and there, but also Deci's suggested addition and a better explanation of plagiarism from Troy.


I am SoullessSingularity, an administrator of the SCP Foundation wiki. You have been issued a permanent ban for expressing bigoted views in your profile, the continued posting of off-topic opinions, the spamming of misrepresenting and grandstanding posts, and the inability to disagree in a respectful manner. You may appeal this ban in #site17 of the IRC platform, or PM me if you cannot access the IRC platform. You may also ask questions if you are unclear about any of the above through the same channels.


Living the dream, or dreaming the life?

Permanent ban.

He showcases a good amount of incorrect information and is clearly arguing in bad faith. Unwelcome here.

Re: Disciplinary - D Entrol by DexanoteDexanote, 19 Jul 2018 01:53

I'll support perma.

Re: Disciplinary - D Entrol by QuikngruvnQuikngruvn, 19 Jul 2018 01:45

I'll third it. The "club gay" comment, while not on our site, shows pretty clearly that they're not engaging with us in good faith.

A lot of line-toeing, hostility, AND another drama YouTuber making videos about users and posts and articles on our site? Yeah, I'll second perma.

Re: Disciplinary - D Entrol by DecibellesDecibelles, 19 Jul 2018 01:20

Ideally in two places: the Chatop Guide, under the section Site17 in the tab ASSORTED POINTS OF ORDER; and the Chat Guide, under Chat Connection in the tab Connecting.

A user, which chose to be anonymous, reached out to me with concerns about D EntrolD Entrol. They were concerned that the user in question has been posting overly vehement comments that are vitrolic and targeted towards specific users for being LGBTQ+ or posting LGBTQ+ works. By posting repeatedly about the SCP having an agenda, D Entrol may be posting with an agenda themselves.

Please refer below with the complaint:

<Anon> user by the name of D Entrol
<Anon> basically, im almost certain the dude's acting and arguing in bad faith. outside of his arguments, of course.
<Anon> plus just. uuuh other concerns unrelated to that like a really inappropriate comment on 004
<Anon> ( this one )

Post in question:

Continued complaint:

<Anon> 1. his about on the wiki is "We're just kinda sick of trying to fit into their elitist games and propaganda. Fuck the LGBTQI2SABIEFMAEWOMVREAFNERFPKRTNGMRTERBBGHTEYTBTG++ SCP."
<Anon> 2. he's directly invoked nazis in defaming dr. magnus, and staff at large, here and

The posts in question:

Continued complaint:

<Anon> 3. on the dude's offshoot website "the chaos insurgency" in announcing a page directly influenced, if not lifting text wholesale, from djkaktus's first proposal, "The Children", stated "Congrats boys. We worked it through. We made an ultimate fuck you to one of the club gay users."
<Anon> [it should also be noted that the dude's the admin/owner of the site]

I would like to point out that one of the posts, referring to the 'stepping down' of kaktus, and this lifting, may be that this user's posts and behaviors are intentionally targeting kaktus, who is a junior staff on CO. In short, they may be targeting a staff member with their posts and behavior.

Continued complaint:

<Anon> 4. the dude has *repeatedly* hid behind a defense consisting of "inb4 corrupt mods ban me" which REEKS of a martyr complex and also is a tacit admission that he knows he's being a fucked up asshole about things. he literally says "Now to prevent myself from getting suspended or banned…" before one of the examples. again
<Anon> 5. i dont think this dude's offered almost any productive thought on the wiki other than serving to stir shit up, toe the line between critiquing the work and author, or offer vapid commentary with the vaguest hints of meaning

The link here is to another, already quoted post.


<anon> [for 5, as something i'd argue toeing the line]

The post in question:

I would like to warn or remove the user for the following breakings of rules:
1. They do not disagree with staff politely, nor do they post with any reasonableness
2. They continue to post off-topic screeds that are not about the actual article, but using articles as evidence of the validity of their grandstanding behavior
3. Their about page is distinctly against LGBTQ SCP members or articles, which is a bigoted position which we do not support, as we have existing policy that we do not allow rule-breaking content in the profiles of users also
4. They may be targeting a individual members of staff and users explicitly, and thus need to be removed for the safety of those users
5. They have made a video explicitly highlighting specific users and staff, if not outright targeting. I am now moving for a permanent ban.

Living the dream, or dreaming the life?

appreciation of the good rather than fostering the assumption that low is bad

This is my concern.

I'd suggest we give it a title more along the lines of "Underappreciated Pages" or "Undershared Pages" given that most of these will typically have a low number of total votes as well as a low overall rating.

It can’t hurt, and it might help. That’s my kind of plan.

My only question is simply where will this be recorded?

Living the dream, or dreaming the life?

Is this a proposal to codify this or something else? I thought this was already a rule, to be honest…

Seems like something RPC staff should be concerned about dealing with, not us.

Why is this guy so obsessed with kinch

Also, why is he posting this thread to gloat on the RPC website? I thought RPC was supposed to be apolitical and trying to go separate ways, instead of focusing on drama.

Re: Disciplinary - JerryJohn by JorethJoreth, 18 Jul 2018 18:50

This seems like a reasonable idea to me, I don't see any reason why we wouldn't want to cut off peanut gallery comments whenever possible.

Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!

It's a small amount of extra effort, but it is worth it to present further unwanted disruption.

However, chatstaff will have to be extra vigilant to handle newbies joining 17 during the mute.

page »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License