New site member AJNotAMonster (account age 87 days, site membership 1 day) has been posting some vague, misleading, or otherwise problematic feedback in the draft forums:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-9903780/anomawalrus-2:2nd-draft-for-my-first-scp#post-4115165
I kinda liked it. I think the teleport thing should be put into more jargon, such as "SCP can demanifest and manifest again at another location" etc.
I also think that the special containment procedures should be a little longer and looser, again with more jargon. You could also include guidelines for who guards it and why, maybe saying that black males are the only ones that turn into SCP-XXXX-A.
I hope this helps and I hope you can help me in return by searching my name into the sandbox and checking out my draft.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-9904310/scp-4234-the-grice#post-4115183
Fairly good, except I think its unrealistic that someone would make such a mistake as drop an SCP
also, what kind of name is Grice? is it supposed to be G-rice?
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-9905266/mind-telling-me-what-yall-think-of-my-scp#post-4115341
There was a small problem and the only way I can read the draft is by editing it. I didn't change anything, but I couldn't open the breach report.
Overall, the idea could be good but it is cut off and vague.
I think the reason it didn't work was because you didn't put a rating bar or item number at the beginning. Maybe fix it and try again?
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-9903618/can-you-guys-give-me-some-critique#post-4115288 (long post)
Sent them the usual "be more conscientious" PM. Might need a C&D soon though, given that they were already addressed by a staff member, they said they would improve, and then failed to do so.