New site member Dr Suzy Esber does not match any existing user name (account age 1 day, site membership 23 hours) has been posting a lot on new articles. A few of their posts are relatively problem-free, but there are many that are more questionable:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-4975/comments/show#post-4071644 (on a page currently at -21 that didn't have proper paragraph spacing)
1) we dont say class disposable, we say class d. we have abreviations.
2) people dont enter "rage modes". they get progresively more agitated. they get angry.
3) its nice of you to compliment your scp, but essentially, how would the foundation know that he did all these great things? you need to remember that its not the scp writing the report himself.to be fair, your format is on point. from first glance i was confused as to why it had so many downvotes because your format was on point, but i figured it mustve been the content. xmen are hard to pull off unless you are an experienced writer. try to do something you'll have a good grasp of and remember to use the sandbox and ask for critiques.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-4977/comments/show#post-4071631 (post title "Its incomplete.", and the article in question technically had all sections present, just left off with a "further stuff…" ending)
Incomplete. -1
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-4509/comments/show#post-4071627
Didn't even read it because it was so long. -1.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-4980/comments/show#post-4071611
Its a bit bland to me, because, aside from the test logs, its just another thing that makes you go crazy and kills you. It was executed well, its just that the concept is a bit bland to me. No votes from me for now.
This has potential if you add more abnormality to it. Make it more interesting, because right now this doesn't have much of a hook.
I'm guessing they might be underage or ESL, giving their typing style. Keep an eye on.