I recently received a complaint about the feedback being given by NicksBigWorld does not match any existing user name, which has been very straightforwardly incorrect:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-8090635/a-picture-to-die-for#post-4027414 (on a camera that killed people whose pictures were taken)
Nice, I think you should continue with the idea! Maybe make it tempting to use. Like some sort of telepathic beckoning.
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-8090299/10000-light-years-away-sentient#post-4027392
I am slightly confused, is the entity that "ate" the star the SCP, or the laser. Also, you need to improve your grammar. And, it's not that… It's hard to explain… Like for example, SCP 173, it describes this statue that kills people. What your describing is a laser beam out of containment, out of control in general, that is giving the foundation 10000 years to stop the laser.
Also, all SCPs are either in containment or dead. So, your SCP, does really work. Hope this helps. Just try to make it so the foundation somehow contained the entity.
P.S This is coming from a not very experienced but still ok writer.
Sent them the usual "please be more conscientious" PM, and responded in the forums.
ETA: got a reply
Sorry! I was just voicing my opinion. Didn't think it would cause trouble. Is there a way I can learn how to "critic" properly?
I sent them links to the critique informational essays, and told them to read more